These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. The soft plastic contact lenses. Dastoor SK Indian J Ophthalmol; 1973 Mar; 21(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 4793003 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of new hydrogen peroxide disinfection systems. Krezanoski JZ; Houlsby RD J Am Optom Assoc; 1988 Mar; 59(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 3162502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Disinfecting solutions for soft contact lenses using different color indicators. García-Monlleó RM; Rivas MJ; Huertas R; Melgosa M Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Mar; 83(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 16534458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Microbiological evaluation of soft contact lens disinfecting solutions. Houlsby RD; Ghajar M; Chavez G J Am Optom Assoc; 1984 Mar; 55(3):205-11. PubMed ID: 6371112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Isolation and identification of biologically active contaminants from soft contact lenses. I. Nicotine deposits on worn lenses. Broich JR; Weiss L; Rapp J Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1980 Nov; 19(11):1328-35. PubMed ID: 7429767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Comparison of tolerance to hydrophilic contact lenses made of Hema (37% H2O) and Hema-Degma (55%, 65% H2O) in the rabbit eye. I. Changes in corneal transparency due to disturbed hydration]. Cejková J; Lojda Z; Brůnová B; Vacík J; Michálek J Cesk Oftalmol; 1989 Nov; 45(6):401-7. PubMed ID: 2575015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pseudomonas aeruginosa contamination of hydrophilic contact lenses and solutions. Milauskas AT Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol; 1972; 76(2):511-6. PubMed ID: 4200565 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Soft bifocal contact lenses for patients with nearpoint asthenopia. Libassi DP; Barron CL; London R J Am Optom Assoc; 1985 Nov; 56(11):866-70. PubMed ID: 4078211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Oxygen transmissibility and hydration of new and used hydrogel contact lenses. Refojo MF; Leong FL; Ueno N; Herman J J Am Optom Assoc; 1982 Mar; 53(3):215-8. PubMed ID: 7077039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Comparison of tolerance to hydrophilic contact lenses made of Hema (37% H2O) and Hema-Degma (55%, 65% H2O) in the rabbit eye. II. Changes in corneal transparency due profound degenerative processes]. Cejková J; Lojda Z; Brůnová B; Vacík J; Michálek J Cesk Oftalmol; 1989 Nov; 45(6):408-11. PubMed ID: 2605655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Hydrophilic toric contact lenses in the correction of astigmatism]. Filip M; Stănescu S Oftalmologia; 1998; 42(1):63-5. PubMed ID: 9713203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Visual correction of keratoconus with soft contact lenses. Koliopoulos J; Tragakis M Ann Ophthalmol; 1981 Jul; 13(7):835-7. PubMed ID: 7294620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of blinking on the level of oxygen beneath hard and soft gas-permeable contact lenses. Efron N; Carney LG J Am Optom Assoc; 1983 Mar; 54(3):229-34. PubMed ID: 6841873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]