These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23934235)
21. Comparison of antibiotic susceptibility and plasmid content, between biofilm producing and non-producing clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Delissalde F; Amábile-Cuevas CF Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2004 Oct; 24(4):405-8. PubMed ID: 15380270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Initial bacterial attachment in slow flowing systems: effects of cell and substrate surface properties. Wang H; Sodagari M; Chen Y; He X; Newby BM; Ju LK Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2011 Oct; 87(2):415-22. PubMed ID: 21715146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Advances in the study of synergistic effect of anti-biofilm agents]. Wang CZ; Cheng HJ Yao Xue Xue Bao; 2012 Mar; 47(3):339-45. PubMed ID: 22645757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effect of antibiotic co-administration on young and mature biofilms of cystic fibrosis clinical isolates: the importance of the biofilm model. Tré-Hardy M; Macé C; El Manssouri N; Vanderbist F; Traore H; Devleeschouwer MJ Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2009 Jan; 33(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 18801647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. In vitro activity of antibiotic combinations against Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm and planktonic cultures. Tré-Hardy M; Vanderbist F; Traore H; Devleeschouwer MJ Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2008 Apr; 31(4):329-36. PubMed ID: 18280117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Molybdenum Disulfide Surfaces to Reduce Amin M; Rowley-Neale S; Shalamanova L; Lynch S; Wilson-Nieuwenhuis JT; El Mohtadi M; Banks CE; Whitehead KA ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2020 May; 12(18):21057-21069. PubMed ID: 32289218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effects of substrates on biofilm formation observed by atomic force microscopy. Oh YJ; Lee NR; Jo W; Jung WK; Lim JS Ultramicroscopy; 2009 Jul; 109(8):874-80. PubMed ID: 19394143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Influence of sub-inhibitory antibiotics and flow condition on Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538 biofilm development and biofilm growth rate: BioTimer assay as a study model. Berlutti F; Frioni A; Natalizi T; Pantanella F; Valenti P J Antibiot (Tokyo); 2014 Nov; 67(11):763-9. PubMed ID: 24865865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. In situ and real time investigation of the evolution of a Pseudomonas fluorescens nascent biofilm in the presence of an antimicrobial peptide. Quilès F; Saadi S; Francius G; Bacharouche J; Humbert F Biochim Biophys Acta; 2016 Jan; 1858(1):75-84. PubMed ID: 26525662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The ionic liquid 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium demonstrates comparable antimicrobial and antibiofilm behavior to a cationic surfactant. Venkata Nancharaiah Y; Reddy GK; Lalithamanasa P; Venugopalan VP Biofouling; 2012; 28(10):1141-9. PubMed ID: 23092364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effect of chlorhexidine and benzalkonium chloride on bacterial biofilm formation. Houari A; Di Martino P Lett Appl Microbiol; 2007 Dec; 45(6):652-6. PubMed ID: 17944843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Hierarchical Rose Petal Surfaces Delay the Early-Stage Bacterial Biofilm Growth. Cao Y; Jana S; Bowen L; Tan X; Liu H; Rostami N; Brown J; Jakubovics NS; Chen J Langmuir; 2019 Nov; 35(45):14670-14680. PubMed ID: 31630525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of biofilm production by Pseudomonas aeruginosa from canine ears and the impact of biofilm on antimicrobial susceptibility in vitro. Pye CC; Yu AA; Weese JS Vet Dermatol; 2013 Aug; 24(4):446-9, e98-9. PubMed ID: 23738965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Influence of Chlorhexidine and Prontosan on Dual Species and Monospecies Biofilms Formed by Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa]. Kuznetsova MV; Encheva YA; Samartsev VA Antibiot Khimioter; 2015; 60(11-12):15-22. PubMed ID: 27141642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effect of a solution containing citrate/Methylene Blue/parabens on Staphylococcus aureus bacteria and biofilm, and comparison with various heparin solutions. Sauer K; Steczko J; Ash SR J Antimicrob Chemother; 2009 May; 63(5):937-45. PubMed ID: 19282330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Antibacterial effect of gallium and silver on Pseudomonas aeruginosa treated with gallium-silver-phosphate-based glasses. Valappil SP; Higham SM Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(3):1589-94. PubMed ID: 24840197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Control of bacterial biofilms with marine alkaloid derivatives. Huigens RW; Ma L; Gambino C; Moeller PD; Basso A; Cavanagh J; Wozniak DJ; Melander C Mol Biosyst; 2008 Jun; 4(6):614-21. PubMed ID: 18493660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Tympanostomy tube in vitro biofilm potential of common otopathogens. Ojano-Dirain C; Antonelli PJ Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 May; 146(5):816-22. PubMed ID: 22371343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Nanoscale investigation on Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formed on porous silicon using atomic force microscopy. Kannan A; Karumanchi SL; Krishna V; Thiruvengadam K; Ramalingam S; Gautam P Scanning; 2014; 36(5):551-3. PubMed ID: 25042006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]