These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2393471)

  • 1. Car driver behavior at flashing light railroad grade crossings.
    Tenkink E; Van der Horst R
    Accid Anal Prev; 1990 Jun; 22(3):229-39. PubMed ID: 2393471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Driver behaviour at rail level crossings: responses to flashing lights, traffic signals and stop signs in simulated rural driving.
    Lenné MG; Rudin-Brown CM; Navarro J; Edquist J; Trotter M; Tomasevic N
    Appl Ergon; 2011 May; 42(4):548-54. PubMed ID: 20926063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Driver's behavioural changes with new intelligent transport system interventions at railway level crossings--A driving simulator study.
    Larue GS; Kim I; Rakotonirainy A; Haworth NL; Ferreira L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Aug; 81():74-85. PubMed ID: 25956609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of driver behavior at railroad grade crossings with two different protection systems.
    Meeker F; Fox D; Weber C
    Accid Anal Prev; 1997 Jan; 29(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 9110035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Driver behavior at flashing-light, rail-highway crossings.
    Aberg L
    Accid Anal Prev; 1988 Feb; 20(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 3337766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Innovative countermeasures for red light running prevention at signalized intersections: A driving simulator study.
    Hussain Q; Alhajyaseen WKM; Brijs K; Pirdavani A; Brijs T
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Jan; 134():105349. PubMed ID: 31707167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influences of motorcycle rider and driver characteristics and road environment on red light running behavior at signalized intersections.
    Jensupakarn A; Kanitpong K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Apr; 113():317-324. PubMed ID: 29471234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Eye movement as a function to explore the effects of improved signs design and audio warning on drivers' behavior at STOP-sign-controlled grade crossings.
    Liu R; Yan X; Ma S; Xue Q
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Jul; 172():106693. PubMed ID: 35552119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Market basket analysis of safety at active highway-railroad grade crossings.
    Saunders WJ; Mousa SR; Codjoe J
    J Safety Res; 2019 Dec; 71():125-137. PubMed ID: 31862023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measuring driver responses at railway level crossings.
    Tey LS; Ferreira L; Wallace A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2011 Nov; 43(6):2134-2141. PubMed ID: 21819844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of audio in-vehicle red light-running warning message on driving behavior based on a driving simulator experiment.
    Yan X; Liu Y; Xu Y
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 24697409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. To stop or not to stop: Contrasting compliant and non-compliant driver behaviour at rural rail level crossings.
    Beanland V; Salmon PM; Filtness AJ; Lenné MG; Stanton NA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Nov; 108():209-219. PubMed ID: 28915502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating the effects of automated monitoring on driver non-compliance at active railway level crossings.
    Larue GS; Naweed A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Dec; 163():106432. PubMed ID: 34710780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Where do novice and experienced drivers direct their attention on approach to urban rail level crossings?
    Young KL; Lenné MG; Beanland V; Salmon PM; Stanton NA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Apr; 77():1-11. PubMed ID: 25661565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of texting on driver behaviour at rail level crossings.
    Young KL; Lenné MG; Salmon PM; Stanton NA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Sep; 118():269-276. PubMed ID: 29793866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effectiveness of traffic light vs. boom barrier controls at road-rail level crossings: a simulator study.
    Rudin-Brown CM; Lenné MG; Edquist J; Navarro J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2012 Mar; 45():187-94. PubMed ID: 22269500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Driver speed compliance following automatic incident detection: Insights from a naturalistic driving study.
    Varotto SF; Jansen R; Bijleveld F; van Nes N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Feb; 150():105939. PubMed ID: 33338911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modelling driver behaviour towards innovative warning devices at railway level crossings.
    Tey LS; Wallis G; Cloete S; Ferreira L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Mar; 51():104-11. PubMed ID: 23207839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An observational study of driver behavior at a protected railroad grade crossing as trains approach.
    Meeker FL; Barr RA
    Accid Anal Prev; 1989 Jun; 21(3):255-62. PubMed ID: 2736022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of proposed countermeasures for dilemma zone at signalized intersections based on cellular automata simulations.
    Wu Y; Abdel-Aty M; Ding Y; Jia B; Shi Q; Yan X
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jul; 116():69-78. PubMed ID: 28911878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.