These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23934772)

  • 1. Exhaustive comparison and classification of ligand-binding surfaces in proteins.
    Murakami Y; Kinoshita K; Kinjo AR; Nakamura H
    Protein Sci; 2013 Oct; 22(10):1379-91. PubMed ID: 23934772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. PLIC: protein-ligand interaction clusters.
    Anand P; Nagarajan D; Mukherjee S; Chandra N
    Database (Oxford); 2014; 2014(0):bau029. PubMed ID: 24763918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detecting local ligand-binding site similarity in nonhomologous proteins by surface patch comparison.
    Sael L; Kihara D
    Proteins; 2012 Apr; 80(4):1177-95. PubMed ID: 22275074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Protein functional surfaces: global shape matching and local spatial alignments of ligand binding sites.
    Binkowski TA; Joachimiak A
    BMC Struct Biol; 2008 Oct; 8():45. PubMed ID: 18954462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Geometric similarities of protein-protein interfaces at atomic resolution are only observed within homologous families: an exhaustive structural classification study.
    Kinjo AR; Nakamura H
    J Mol Biol; 2010 Jun; 399(3):526-40. PubMed ID: 20417638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predicting Ligand Binding Sites on Protein Surfaces by 3-Dimensional Probability Density Distributions of Interacting Atoms.
    Jian JW; Elumalai P; Pitti T; Wu CY; Tsai KC; Chang JY; Peng HP; Yang AS
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0160315. PubMed ID: 27513851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. PL-PatchSurfer: a novel molecular local surface-based method for exploring protein-ligand interactions.
    Hu B; Zhu X; Monroe L; Bures MG; Kihara D
    Int J Mol Sci; 2014 Aug; 15(9):15122-45. PubMed ID: 25167137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comprehensive structural classification of ligand-binding motifs in proteins.
    Kinjo AR; Nakamura H
    Structure; 2009 Feb; 17(2):234-46. PubMed ID: 19217394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrostatic Energy in Protein-Ligand Complexes.
    Bitencourt-Ferreira G; Veit-Acosta M; de Azevedo WF
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 2053():67-77. PubMed ID: 31452099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Structural and functional studies of S-adenosyl-L-methionine binding proteins: a ligand-centric approach.
    Gana R; Rao S; Huang H; Wu C; Vasudevan S
    BMC Struct Biol; 2013 Apr; 13():6. PubMed ID: 23617634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A library of protein surface patches discriminates between native structures and decoys generated by structure prediction servers.
    Gamliel R; Kedem K; Kolodny R; Keasar C
    BMC Struct Biol; 2011 May; 11(1):20. PubMed ID: 21542935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computational method to identify druggable binding sites that target protein-protein interactions.
    Li H; Kasam V; Tautermann CS; Seeliger D; Vaidehi N
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 May; 54(5):1391-400. PubMed ID: 24762202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Structural motifs recurring in different folds recognize the same ligand fragments.
    Ausiello G; Gherardini PF; Gatti E; Incani O; Helmer-Citterich M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Jun; 10():182. PubMed ID: 19527512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patch Finder Plus (PFplus): a web server for extracting and displaying positive electrostatic patches on protein surfaces.
    Shazman S; Celniker G; Haber O; Glaser F; Mandel-Gutfreund Y
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2007 Jul; 35(Web Server issue):W526-30. PubMed ID: 17537808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A new protein binding pocket similarity measure based on comparison of clouds of atoms in 3D: application to ligand prediction.
    Hoffmann B; Zaslavskiy M; Vert JP; Stoven V
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Feb; 11():99. PubMed ID: 20175916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A new method to detect related function among proteins independent of sequence and fold homology.
    Schmitt S; Kuhn D; Klebe G
    J Mol Biol; 2002 Oct; 323(2):387-406. PubMed ID: 12381328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mapping of ligand-binding cavities in proteins.
    Andersson CD; Chen BY; Linusson A
    Proteins; 2010 May; 78(6):1408-22. PubMed ID: 20034113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Knowledge-guided docking: accurate prospective prediction of bound configurations of novel ligands using Surflex-Dock.
    Cleves AE; Jain AN
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2015 Jun; 29(6):485-509. PubMed ID: 25940276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predicting nucleic acid binding interfaces from structural models of proteins.
    Dror I; Shazman S; Mukherjee S; Zhang Y; Glaser F; Mandel-Gutfreund Y
    Proteins; 2012 Feb; 80(2):482-9. PubMed ID: 22086767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Binary image representation of a ligand binding site: its application to efficient sampling of a conformational ensemble.
    Sung E; Kim S; Shin W
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 May; 11():256. PubMed ID: 20478076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.