186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23934937)
1. Accuracy of a freehand sculpting tool for unicondylar knee replacement.
Smith JR; Riches PE; Rowe PJ
Int J Med Robot; 2014 Jun; 10(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 23934937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. High degree of accuracy of a novel image-free handheld robot for unicondylar knee arthroplasty in a cadaveric study.
Lonner JH; Smith JR; Picard F; Hamlin B; Rowe PJ; Riches PE
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jan; 473(1):206-12. PubMed ID: 25002214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Precision freehand sculpting for unicondylar knee replacement: design and experimental validation.
Jaramaz B; Nikou C
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2012 Feb; 57(4):293-9. PubMed ID: 22868782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of femoral to tibial varus mismatch on the contact area of unicondylar knee prostheses.
Diezi C; Wirth S; Meyer DC; Koch PP
Knee; 2010 Oct; 17(5):350-5. PubMed ID: 19914073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy assessment of a novel image-free handheld robot for Total Knee Arthroplasty in a cadaveric study.
Casper M; Mitra R; Khare R; Jaramaz B; Hamlin B; McGinley B; Mayman D; Headrick J; Urish K; Gittins M; Incavo S; Neginhal V
Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon); 2018 Dec; 23(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 30307763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Alignment of resection planes in total knee replacement obtained with the conventional technique, as assessed by a modern computer-based navigation system.
Belvedere C; Ensini A; Leardini A; Bianchi L; Catani F; Giannini S
Int J Med Robot; 2007 Jun; 3(2):117-24. PubMed ID: 17619241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasties: robot vs. patient specific instrumentation.
Jaffry Z; Masjedi M; Clarke S; Harris S; Karia M; Andrews B; Cobb J
Knee; 2014 Mar; 21(2):428-34. PubMed ID: 24342544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Implant orientation accuracy of a hand-held robotic partial knee replacement system over conventional technique in a cadaveric test.
Khare R; Jaramaz B; Hamlin B; Urish KL
Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon); 2018 Dec; 23(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 29932791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of robot-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: a controlled cadaver study using multiparameter quantitative three-dimensional CT assessment of alignment.
Moon YW; Ha CW; Do KH; Kim CY; Han JH; Na SE; Lee CH; Kim JG; Park YS
Comput Aided Surg; 2012; 17(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 22348661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotically Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty with a Handheld Image-Free Sculpting Tool.
Lonner JH
Orthop Clin North Am; 2016 Jan; 47(1):29-40. PubMed ID: 26614918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Surgical Accuracy of an Early Intervention Knee Implant Instrumentation System.
Lowry M; Buza J; Liu J; Rosenbaum H; Lavery J; Bosco J; Walker PS
J Knee Surg; 2018 Nov; 31(10):979-985. PubMed ID: 29381882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Low femoral component prominence negatively influences early revision rate in robotic unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
Klasan A; Carter M; Holland S; Young SW
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2020 Dec; 28(12):3906-3911. PubMed ID: 32030503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty has a learning curve of seven cases for integration into the surgical workflow but no learning curve effect for accuracy of implant positioning.
Kayani B; Konan S; Huq SS; Tahmassebi J; Haddad FS
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2019 Apr; 27(4):1132-1141. PubMed ID: 30225554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Total knee arthroplasty with a novel navigation system within the surgical field.
Scuderi GR; Fallaha M; Masse V; Lavigne P; Amiot LP; Berthiaume MJ
Orthop Clin North Am; 2014 Apr; 45(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 24684910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cutting error of the distal femur in total knee arthroplasty by use of a navigation system.
Nakahara H; Matsuda S; Moro-oka TA; Okazaki K; Tashiro Y; Iwamoto Y
J Arthroplasty; 2012 Jun; 27(6):1119-22. PubMed ID: 22019323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of a computer-assisted navigation system for total knee replacement.
Pitto RP; Graydon AJ; Bradley L; Malak SF; Walker CG; Anderson IA
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 May; 88(5):601-5. PubMed ID: 16645104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of accuracy of an imageless hand-held robotic-assisted system in component positioning in total knee replacement: a prospective study.
Vaidya N; Jaysingani TN; Panjwani T; Patil R; Deshpande A; Kesarkar A
J Robot Surg; 2022 Apr; 16(2):361-367. PubMed ID: 33945087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hands-on robotic unicompartmental knee replacement: a prospective, randomised controlled study of the acrobot system.
Cobb J; Henckel J; Gomes P; Harris S; Jakopec M; Rodriguez F; Barrett A; Davies B
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Feb; 88(2):188-97. PubMed ID: 16434522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: is robotic technology more accurate than conventional technique?
Citak M; Suero EM; Citak M; Dunbar NJ; Branch SH; Conditt MA; Banks SA; Pearle AD
Knee; 2013 Aug; 20(4):268-71. PubMed ID: 23201147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty: Does the tibial component remain at malposition risk?
Bové JC
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2010 Sep; 96(5):536-42. PubMed ID: 20605549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
