These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

534 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23935581)

  • 1. HDDM: Hierarchical Bayesian estimation of the Drift-Diffusion Model in Python.
    Wiecki TV; Sofer I; Frank MJ
    Front Neuroinform; 2013; 7():14. PubMed ID: 23935581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Simultaneous Hierarchical Bayesian Parameter Estimation for Reinforcement Learning and Drift Diffusion Models: a Tutorial and Links to Neural Data.
    Pedersen ML; Frank MJ
    Comput Brain Behav; 2020 Dec; 3(4):458-471. PubMed ID: 35128308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Beyond Drift Diffusion Models: Fitting a Broad Class of Decision and Reinforcement Learning Models with HDDM.
    Fengler A; Bera K; Pedersen ML; Frank MJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2022 Sep; 34(10):1780-1805. PubMed ID: 35939629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dynamic models of choice.
    Heathcote A; Lin YS; Reynolds A; Strickland L; Gretton M; Matzke D
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Apr; 51(2):961-985. PubMed ID: 29959755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Motor speed does not impact the drift rate: a computational HDDM approach to differentiate cognitive and motor speed.
    Sandry J; Ricker TJ
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2022 Jul; 7(1):66. PubMed ID: 35867284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The drift diffusion model as the choice rule in reinforcement learning.
    Pedersen ML; Frank MJ; Biele G
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1234-1251. PubMed ID: 27966103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing Eight Parameter Estimation Methods for the Ratcliff Diffusion Model Using Free Software.
    Alexandrowicz RW; Gula B
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():484737. PubMed ID: 33117213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hierarchical drift diffusion modeling uncovers multisensory benefit in numerosity discrimination tasks.
    Chau E; Murray CA; Shams L
    PeerJ; 2021; 9():e12273. PubMed ID: 34760356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dissecting the impact of depression on decision-making.
    Lawlor VM; Webb CA; Wiecki TV; Frank MJ; Trivedi M; Pizzagalli DA; Dillon DG
    Psychol Med; 2020 Jul; 50(10):1613-1622. PubMed ID: 31280757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Model-Based fMRI Analysis with Hierarchical Bayesian Parameter Estimation.
    Ahn WY; Krawitz A; Kim W; Busmeyer JR; Brown JW
    J Neurosci Psychol Econ; 2011 May; 4(2):95-110. PubMed ID: 23795233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hierarchical Bayesian inference for ion channel screening dose-response data.
    Johnstone RH; Bardenet R; Gavaghan DJ; Mirams GR
    Wellcome Open Res; 2016; 1():6. PubMed ID: 27918599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceptual decision making: drift-diffusion model is equivalent to a Bayesian model.
    Bitzer S; Park H; Blankenburg F; Kiebel SJ
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2014; 8():102. PubMed ID: 24616689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An Overcomplete Approach to Fitting Drift-Diffusion Decision Models to Trial-By-Trial Data.
    Feltgen Q; Daunizeau J
    Front Artif Intell; 2021; 4():531316. PubMed ID: 33898982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Bayesian Reformulation of the Extended Drift-Diffusion Model in Perceptual Decision Making.
    Fard PR; Park H; Warkentin A; Kiebel SJ; Bitzer S
    Front Comput Neurosci; 2017; 11():29. PubMed ID: 28553219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How attention influences perceptual decision making: Single-trial EEG correlates of drift-diffusion model parameters.
    Nunez MD; Vandekerckhove J; Srinivasan R
    J Math Psychol; 2017 Feb; 76(Pt B):117-130. PubMed ID: 28435173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A flexible framework for simulating and fitting generalized drift-diffusion models.
    Shinn M; Lam NH; Murray JD
    Elife; 2020 Aug; 9():. PubMed ID: 32749218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Enhanced decision-making in nicotine dependent individuals who abstain: A computational analysis using Hierarchical Drift Diffusion Modeling.
    Biernacki K; Molokotos E; Han C; Dillon DG; Leventhal AM; Janes AC
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2023 Sep; 250():110890. PubMed ID: 37480798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. HMeta-d: hierarchical Bayesian estimation of metacognitive efficiency from confidence ratings.
    Fleming SM
    Neurosci Conscious; 2017; 2017(1):nix007. PubMed ID: 29877507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bayesian inference with Stan: A tutorial on adding custom distributions.
    Annis J; Miller BJ; Palmeri TJ
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Jun; 49(3):863-886. PubMed ID: 27287444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using Drift Diffusion and RL Models to Disentangle Effects of Depression On Decision-Making vs. Learning in the Probabilistic Reward Task.
    Dillon DG; Belleau EL; Origlio J; McKee M; Jahan A; Meyer A; Souther MK; Brunner D; Kuhn M; Ang YS; Cusin C; Fava M; Pizzagalli DA
    Comput Psychiatr; 2024; 8(1):46-69. PubMed ID: 38774430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.