These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23937235)

  • 21. Older adults make greater use of word predictability in Chinese reading.
    Zhao S; Li L; Chang M; Xu Q; Zhang K; Wang J; Paterson KB
    Psychol Aging; 2019 Sep; 34(6):780-790. PubMed ID: 31380666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Estimating the effect of word predictability on eye movements in Chinese reading using latent semantic analysis and transitional probability.
    Wang HC; Pomplun M; Chen M; Ko H; Rayner K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jul; 63(7):1374-86. PubMed ID: 19998069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A further examination of the lexical-processing stages hypothesized by the E-Z Reader model.
    Sheridan H; Reingold EM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Apr; 75(3):407-14. PubMed ID: 23456972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The influence of parafoveal word length and contextual constraint on fixation durations and word skipping in reading.
    White SJ; Rayner K; Liversedge SP
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Jun; 12(3):466-71. PubMed ID: 16235630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Lack of contextual-word predictability during reading in patients with mild Alzheimer disease.
    Fernández G; Manes F; Rotstein NP; Colombo O; Mandolesi P; Politi LE; Agamennoni O
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Sep; 62():143-51. PubMed ID: 25080188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reading skill and word skipping: Implications for visual and linguistic accounts of word skipping.
    Eskenazi MA; Folk JR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Nov; 41(6):1923-8. PubMed ID: 26098181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Processing of compound-word characters in reading Chinese: an eye-movement-contingent display change study.
    Cui L; Yan G; Bai X; Hyönä J; Wang S; Liversedge SP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):527-47. PubMed ID: 22809368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Eye movements and processing stages in reading: relative contribution of visual, lexical, and contextual factors.
    Calvo MG; Meseguer E
    Span J Psychol; 2002 May; 5(1):66-77. PubMed ID: 12025367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
    Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M
    Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Lexical processing and text integration of function and content words: evidence from priming and eye fixations.
    Schmauder AR; Morris RK; Poynor DV
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Oct; 28(7):1098-108. PubMed ID: 11126934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Emotion words affect eye fixations during reading.
    Scott GG; O'Donnell PJ; Sereno SC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):783-92. PubMed ID: 22329788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Where is the locus of the lowercase advantage during sentence reading?
    Perea M; Rosa E; Marcet A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Jun; 177():30-35. PubMed ID: 28453952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Chinese readers can perceive a word even when it's composed of noncontiguous characters.
    Ma G; Pollatsek A; Li Y; Li X
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Jan; 43(1):158-166. PubMed ID: 27504682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Visual word recognition during reading is followed by subvocal articulation.
    Eiter BM; Inhoff AW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):457-70. PubMed ID: 20192542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Eye movements and lexical ambiguity resolution: investigating the subordinate-bias effect.
    Sereno SC; O'Donnell PJ; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):335-50. PubMed ID: 16634674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The influence of word shading and word length on eye movements during reading.
    Leyland LA; Kirkby JA; Juhasz BJ; Pollatsek A; Liversedge SP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):471-86. PubMed ID: 21988376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reading aloud: On the determinants of the joint effects of stimulus quality and word frequency.
    White D; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 May; 43(5):749-756. PubMed ID: 27936847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of word predictability and preview lexicality on eye movements during reading: A comparison between young and older adults.
    Choi W; Lowder MW; Ferreira F; Swaab TY; Henderson JM
    Psychol Aging; 2017 May; 32(3):232-242. PubMed ID: 28333501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Influence of reading skill and word length on fixation-related brain activity in school-aged children during natural reading.
    Loberg O; Hautala J; Hämäläinen JA; Leppänen PHT
    Vision Res; 2019 Dec; 165():109-122. PubMed ID: 31710840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Word misperception, the neighbor frequency effect, and the role of sentence context: evidence from eye movements.
    Slattery TJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Dec; 35(6):1969-75. PubMed ID: 19968447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.