These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Biomechanical Evaluation of a Single- Versus Double-Tunnel Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction With Acromioclavicular Stabilization for Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries. Banffy MB; Uquillas C; Neumann JA; ElAttrache NS Am J Sports Med; 2018 Apr; 46(5):1070-1076. PubMed ID: 29438625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Structural properties of the intact and the reconstructed coracoclavicular ligament complex. Harris RI; Wallace AL; Harper GD; Goldberg JA; Sonnabend DH; Walsh WR Am J Sports Med; 2000; 28(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 10653552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical comparison of patellar fixation techniques in medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Russ SD; Tompkins M; Nuckley D; Macalena J Am J Sports Med; 2015 Jan; 43(1):195-9. PubMed ID: 25261087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A biomechanical evaluation of an anatomical coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction. Mazzocca AD; Santangelo SA; Johnson ST; Rios CG; Dumonski ML; Arciero RA Am J Sports Med; 2006 Feb; 34(2):236-46. PubMed ID: 16282577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intramedullary acromioclavicular ligament reconstruction strengthens isolated coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction in acromioclavicular dislocations. Gonzalez-Lomas G; Javidan P; Lin T; Adamson GJ; Limpisvasti O; Lee TQ Am J Sports Med; 2010 Oct; 38(10):2113-22. PubMed ID: 20739579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical rationale for development of anatomical reconstructions of coracoclavicular ligaments after complete acromioclavicular joint dislocations. Costic RS; Labriola JE; Rodosky MW; Debski RE Am J Sports Med; 2004 Dec; 32(8):1929-36. PubMed ID: 15572323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical Analysis of Single-, Double-, and Triple-Bundle Configurations for Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction Using Cortical Fixation Buttons With Suture Tapes: A Cadaveric Study. Park I; Itami Y; Hedayati B; Bitner B; McGarry MH; Lee TQ; Shin SJ Arthroscopy; 2018 Nov; 34(11):2983-2991. PubMed ID: 30292596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical evaluation of three patellar fixation techniques for MPFL reconstruction: Load to failure did not differ but interference screw stabilization was stiffer than suture anchor and suture-knot fixation. Raoulis VA; Zibis A; Chiotelli MD; Kermanidis AT; Banios K; Schuster P; Hantes ME Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2021 Nov; 29(11):3697-3705. PubMed ID: 33386885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Acromioclavicular joint stabilization with a double cow-hitch technique compared to a double tight-rope: a biomechanical study. Borbas P; Angelella D; Laux CJ; Bachmann E; Ernstbrunner L; Bouaicha S; Wieser K Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2022 Jul; 142(7):1309-1315. PubMed ID: 33479838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical evaluation of a new reconstruction technique of the ulnar collateral ligament in the elbow with modified bone tunnel placement and interference screw fixation. Seiber KS; Savoie FH; McGarry MH; Gupta R; Lee TQ Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2010 Jan; 25(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 19837496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of distal clavicle excision on in situ graft forces in coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction. Kowalsky MS; Kremenic IJ; Orishimo KF; McHugh MP; Nicholas SJ; Lee SJ Am J Sports Med; 2010 Nov; 38(11):2313-9. PubMed ID: 20699427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Simultaneous anatomic reconstruction of the acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular ligaments using a single tendon graft. Shin SJ; Campbell S; Scott J; McGarry MH; Lee TQ Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2014 Sep; 22(9):2216-22. PubMed ID: 23842800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction: biomechanical comparison of tendon graft repairs to a synthetic double bundle augmentation. Wellmann M; Kempka JP; Schanz S; Zantop T; Waizy H; Raschke MJ; Petersen W Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2009 May; 17(5):521-8. PubMed ID: 19225755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A biomechanical assessment of a novel double endobutton technique versus a coracoid cerclage sling for acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular injuries. Grantham C; Heckmann N; Wang L; Tibone JE; Struhl S; Lee TQ Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2016 Jun; 24(6):1918-24. PubMed ID: 25073944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical comparison of coracoclavicular reconstructive techniques. Thomas K; Litsky A; Jones G; Bishop JY Am J Sports Med; 2011 Apr; 39(4):804-10. PubMed ID: 21257841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stability of acromioclavicular joint reconstruction: biomechanical testing of various surgical techniques in a cadaveric model. Deshmukh AV; Wilson DR; Zilberfarb JL; Perlmutter GS Am J Sports Med; 2004 Sep; 32(6):1492-8. PubMed ID: 15310576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bioabsorbable screw fixation in coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction. Talbert TW; Green JR; Mukherjee DP; Ogden AL; Mayeux RH J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2003; 13(4):319-23. PubMed ID: 14649570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Strength of suture anchor versus transosseous tunnel in anatomic reconstruction of the ankle lateral ligaments: a biomechanical study. Li HY; Hua YH; Wu ZY; Chen B; Chen SY Arthroscopy; 2013 Nov; 29(11):1817-25. PubMed ID: 24209679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]