These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23938086)

  • 61. Cost- and time-effective three-dimensional bone-shape reconstruction from X-ray images.
    Gunay M; Shim MB; Shimada K
    Int J Med Robot; 2007 Dec; 3(4):323-35. PubMed ID: 18200623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Computer-aided methods for assessing lower limb deformities in orthopaedic surgery planning.
    Subburaj K; Ravi B; Agarwal M
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2010 Jun; 34(4):277-88. PubMed ID: 19963346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. [Epiphyseal distal torsion of the femur in osteoarthritic knees. A computed tomography study of 75 knees with medial arthrosis].
    Boisrenoult P; Scemama P; Fallet L; Beaufils P;
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2001 Sep; 87(5):469-76. PubMed ID: 11547234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Distribution and variability study of the femur cortical thickness from computer tomography.
    Serrurier A; Jolivet E; Quijano S; Thoreux P; Skalli W
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2014 May; 17(7):768-86. PubMed ID: 22967113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. [Rapid femur modeling method based on statistical shape model].
    Zhang Z; Chen Z; Zhang Z; Wang C; Jin Z
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Oct; 39(5):862-869. PubMed ID: 36310474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Bilateral Symmetrical Comparison of Femoral and Tibial Anatomic Features.
    Eckhoff DG; Jacofsky DJ; Springer BD; Dunbar M; Cherian JJ; Elmallah RK; Mont MA; Greene KA
    J Arthroplasty; 2016 May; 31(5):1083-90. PubMed ID: 26989029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Accuracy of biplanar linear radiography versus conventional radiographs when used for lower limb and implant measurements.
    Chua CXK; Tan SHS; Lim AKS; Hui JH
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2022 May; 142(5):735-745. PubMed ID: 33386975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Comparison of canine femoral torsion measurements using the axial and biplanar methods on three-dimensional volumetric reconstructions of computed tomography images.
    Serck BM; Karlin WM; Kowaleski MP
    Vet Surg; 2021 Oct; 50(7):1518-1524. PubMed ID: 34347885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Development of predictive statistical shape models for paediatric lower limb bones.
    Shi B; Barzan M; Nasseri A; Carty CP; Lloyd DG; Davico G; Maharaj JN; Diamond LE; Saxby DJ
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2022 Oct; 225():107002. PubMed ID: 35882107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Three-dimensional reconstruction of In Vivo human lumbar spine from biplanar radiographs.
    Bennani H; McCane B; Cornwall J
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2022 Mar; 96():102011. PubMed ID: 35007843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. 3D reconstruction of proximal femoral fracture from biplanar radiographs with fractural representative learning.
    Buttongkum D; Tangpornprasert P; Virulsri C; Numkarunarunrote N; Amarase C; Kobchaisawat T; Chalidabhongse T
    Sci Rep; 2023 Jan; 13(1):455. PubMed ID: 36624184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Neck-shaft angle measurement in children: accuracy of the conventional radiography-based (2D) methods compared to 3D reconstructions.
    Schlégl ÁT; Nyakas V; Kovács D; Maróti P; Józsa G; Than P
    Sci Rep; 2022 Oct; 12(1):16494. PubMed ID: 36192625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. 3D surface reconstruction of the femur and tibia from parallel 2D contours.
    Lin B; Jin D; Socorro Borges MA
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2022 Mar; 17(1):145. PubMed ID: 35248091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Shape-aware surface reconstruction from sparse 3D point-clouds.
    Bernard F; Salamanca L; Thunberg J; Tack A; Jentsch D; Lamecker H; Zachow S; Hertel F; Goncalves J; Gemmar P
    Med Image Anal; 2017 May; 38():77-89. PubMed ID: 28282642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Low-dose three-dimensional reconstruction of the femur with unit free-form deformation.
    Zeng X; Wang C; Zhou H; Wei S; Chen X
    Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081911. PubMed ID: 25086542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Morphometric analysis and three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction of the long bones of femoral and crural regions in Van cats.
    Yilmaz O; Demircioğlu İ
    Folia Morphol (Warsz); 2021; 80(1):186-195. PubMed ID: 32964410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Interlaboratory comparison of femur surface reconstruction from CT data compared to reference optical 3D scan.
    Soodmand E; Kluess D; Varady PA; Cichon R; Schwarze M; Gehweiler D; Niemeyer F; Pahr D; Woiczinski M
    Biomed Eng Online; 2018 Mar; 17(1):29. PubMed ID: 29495963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. LatentPCN: latent space-constrained point cloud network for reconstruction of 3D patient-specific bone surface models from calibrated biplanar X-ray images.
    Sun W; Zhao Y; Liu J; Zheng G
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2023 Jun; 18(6):989-999. PubMed ID: 37027083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Three-dimensional reconstruction of the hand from biplanar X-rays: Assessment of accuracy and reliability.
    Loisel F; Durand S; Goubier JN; Bonnet X; Rouch P; Skalli W
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2023 Oct; 109(6):103403. PubMed ID: 36108817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. A 3D reconstruction method of the body envelope from biplanar X-rays: Evaluation of its accuracy and reliability.
    Nérot A; Choisne J; Amabile C; Travert C; Pillet H; Wang X; Skalli W
    J Biomech; 2015 Dec; 48(16):4322-6. PubMed ID: 26592437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.