These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2394014)

  • 1. Ventricular refractory period extension caused by defibrillation shocks.
    Sweeney RJ; Gill RM; Steinberg MI; Reid PR
    Circulation; 1990 Sep; 82(3):965-72. PubMed ID: 2394014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of flecainide, encainide, and clofilium on ventricular refractory period extension by transcardiac shocks.
    Sweeney RJ; Gill RM; Steinberg MI; Reid PR
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Jan; 19(1):50-60. PubMed ID: 8848377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Refractory interval after transcardiac shocks during ventricular fibrillation.
    Sweeney RJ; Gill RM; Reid PR
    Circulation; 1996 Dec; 94(11):2947-52. PubMed ID: 8941125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Characterization of refractory period extension by transcardiac shock.
    Sweeney RJ; Gill RM; Reid PR
    Circulation; 1991 Jun; 83(6):2057-66. PubMed ID: 2040057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of defibrillation shock energy and timing on 3-D computer model of heart.
    Province RA; Fishler MG; Thakor NV
    Ann Biomed Eng; 1993; 21(1):19-31. PubMed ID: 8434817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of pulse separation between two sequential biphasic shocks given over different lead configurations on ventricular defibrillation efficacy.
    Johnson EE; Alferness CA; Wolf PD; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1992 Jun; 85(6):2267-74. PubMed ID: 1591840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Countershock strength-duration relationship for myocardial refractory period extension.
    Sweeney RJ; Gill RM; Reid PR
    Acad Emerg Med; 1995 Jan; 2(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 7606615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Refractory period extension during ventricular pacing at fibrillatory pacing rates.
    Gill RM; Sweeney RJ; Reid PR
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Mar; 20(3 Pt 1):647-53. PubMed ID: 9080491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cardiac potential and potential gradient fields generated by single, combined, and sequential shocks during ventricular defibrillation.
    Wharton JM; Wolf PD; Smith WM; Chen PS; Frazier DW; Yabe S; Danieley N; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1992 Apr; 85(4):1510-23. PubMed ID: 1555291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Shock-induced dispersion of ventricular repolarization: implications for the induction of ventricular fibrillation and the upper limit of vulnerability.
    Behrens S; Li C; Fabritz CL; Kirchhof PF; Franz MR
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1997 Sep; 8(9):998-1008. PubMed ID: 9300297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of pacing rate and timing of defibrillation shock on the relation between the defibrillation threshold and the upper limit of vulnerability in open chest dogs.
    Chen PS; Feld GK; Mower MM; Peters BB
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1991 Nov; 18(6):1555-63. PubMed ID: 1939961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mechanism of cardiac defibrillation in open-chest dogs with unipolar DC-coupled simultaneous activation and shock potential recordings.
    Witkowski FX; Penkoske PA; Plonsey R
    Circulation; 1990 Jul; 82(1):244-60. PubMed ID: 2364513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Defibrillating shocks delivered to the heart impair efferent sympathetic responsiveness.
    Ito M; Pride HP; Zipes DP
    Circulation; 1993 Dec; 88(6):2661-73. PubMed ID: 8252677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improved defibrillation thresholds with large contoured epicardial electrodes and biphasic waveforms.
    Dixon EG; Tang AS; Wolf PD; Meador JT; Fine MJ; Calfee RV; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1987 Nov; 76(5):1176-84. PubMed ID: 3665001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of shock strength and timing on induction of ventricular arrhythmias in dogs.
    Shibata N; Chen PS; Dixon EG; Wolf PD; Danieley ND; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Am J Physiol; 1988 Oct; 255(4 Pt 2):H891-901. PubMed ID: 3177678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prospective evaluation of a sequential pacing and high-energy bidirectional shock algorithm for transvenous cardioversion in patients with ventricular tachycardia.
    Lindsay BD; Saksena S; Rothbart ST; Wasty N; Pantopoulos D
    Circulation; 1987 Sep; 76(3):601-9. PubMed ID: 3621521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High and low strength nonsynchronized shocks given during canine ventricular tachycardia.
    McClelland JH; Daubert JP; Kavanagh KM; Harrell FE; Ideker RE
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Jul; 15(7):986-92. PubMed ID: 1378609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Recurrent appearance of protective zones after an unsuccessful defibrillation shock.
    Hwang C; Fan W; Chen PS
    Am J Physiol; 1996 Oct; 271(4 Pt 2):H1491-7. PubMed ID: 8897944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the defibrillation threshold and the upper limit of ventricular vulnerability.
    Chen PS; Shibata N; Dixon EG; Martin RO; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1986 May; 73(5):1022-8. PubMed ID: 3698224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Functional cardiac depression caused by defibrillator shocks. Quantitation of the safety factor for electrical defibrillation.
    Niebauer MJ; Babbs CF; Geddes LA; Carter JE; Bourland JD
    Jpn Heart J; 1984 Sep; 25(5):773-81. PubMed ID: 6512993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.