These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23940813)

  • 1. Evolution of Peromyscus leucopus mice in response to a captive environment.
    Lacy RC; Alaks G; Walsh A
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(8):e72452. PubMed ID: 23940813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inbreeding and selection shape genomic diversity in captive populations: Implications for the conservation of endangered species.
    Willoughby JR; Ivy JA; Lacy RC; Doyle JM; DeWoody JA
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175996. PubMed ID: 28423000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pedigree analysis reveals a generational decline in reproductive success of captive Tasmanian devil (Sarcophilus harrisii): implications for captive management of threatened species.
    Farquharson KA; Hogg CJ; Grueber CE
    J Hered; 2017 Jul; 108(5):488-495. PubMed ID: 28379457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Establishment of a deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus rufinus) breeding colony from wild-caught founders: comparison of reproductive performance of wild-caught and laboratory-reared pairs.
    Botten J; Ricci R; Hjelle B
    Comp Med; 2001 Aug; 51(4):314-8. PubMed ID: 11924788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evolution in reproductive tempo and investment across the Peromyscus radiation.
    Wilsterman K; Cunningham K
    J Exp Zool A Ecol Integr Physiol; 2023 Jan; 339(1):13-27. PubMed ID: 36289026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impacts of inbreeding, drift and selection on genetic diversity in captive breeding populations.
    Willoughby JR; Fernandez NB; Lamb MC; Ivy JA; Lacy RC; DeWoody JA
    Mol Ecol; 2015 Jan; 24(1):98-110. PubMed ID: 25443807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. HIERARCHICAL ANALYSIS OF INBREEDING DEPRESSION IN PEROMYSCUS POLIONOTUS.
    Lacy RC; Alaks G; Walsh A
    Evolution; 1996 Dec; 50(6):2187-2200. PubMed ID: 28565659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Survival and reproduction in Peromyscus leucopus in the laboratory: viable model for aging studies.
    Burger J; Gochfeld M
    Growth Dev Aging; 1992; 56(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 1601572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genetic adaptation to captivity in species conservation programs.
    Frankham R
    Mol Ecol; 2008 Jan; 17(1):325-33. PubMed ID: 18173504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of inbreeding on skeletal size and fluctuating asymmetry of Peromyscus polionotus mice.
    Lacy RC; Alaks G
    Zoo Biol; 2013 Mar; 32(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 22814968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genetic adaptation to captivity can occur in a single generation.
    Christie MR; Marine ML; French RA; Blouin MS
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 Jan; 109(1):238-42. PubMed ID: 22184236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genetic adaptation to captivity and inbreeding depression in small laboratory populations of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Latter BD; Mulley JC
    Genetics; 1995 Jan; 139(1):255-66. PubMed ID: 7705628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of genetic captive-breeding protocols on sperm quality and fertility in the white-footed mouse.
    Malo AF; Martinez-Pastor F; Alaks G; Dubach J; Lacy RC
    Biol Reprod; 2010 Oct; 83(4):540-8. PubMed ID: 20519695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How well can captive breeding programs conserve biodiversity? A review of salmonids.
    Fraser DJ
    Evol Appl; 2008 Nov; 1(4):535-86. PubMed ID: 25567798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Heritable variation in reaction norms of metabolism and activity across temperatures in a wild-derived population of white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus).
    Kaseloo PA; Crowell MG; Heideman PD
    J Comp Physiol B; 2014 May; 184(4):525-34. PubMed ID: 24549715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk assessment of inbreeding and outbreeding depression in a captive-breeding program.
    Rollinson N; Keith DM; Houde AL; Debes PV; McBride MC; Hutchings JA
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Apr; 28(2):529-40. PubMed ID: 24476089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Winter adaptations of male deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) and prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) that vary in reproductive responsiveness to photoperiod.
    Moffatt CA; DeVries AC; Nelson RJ
    J Biol Rhythms; 1993; 8(3):221-32. PubMed ID: 8280911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reproductive seasonality in captive wild ruminants: implications for biogeographical adaptation, photoperiodic control, and life history.
    Zerbe P; Clauss M; Codron D; Bingaman Lackey L; Rensch E; Streich JW; Hatt JM; Müller DW
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2012 Nov; 87(4):965-90. PubMed ID: 22780447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Population correlates of rapid captive-induced maladaptation in a wild fish.
    Fraser DJ; Walker L; Yates MC; Marin K; Wood JLA; Bernos TA; Zastavniouk C
    Evol Appl; 2019 Aug; 12(7):1305-1317. PubMed ID: 31417616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term demographic and genetic effects of releasing captive-born individuals into the wild.
    Willoughby JR; Christie MR
    Conserv Biol; 2019 Apr; 33(2):377-388. PubMed ID: 30168872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.