335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23941005)
1. Primary uterine cervical cancer: correlation of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and clinical staging (FIGO) with histopathology findings.
Kraljević Z; Visković K; Ledinsky M; Zadravec D; Grbavac I; Bilandzija M; Soljacić-Vranes H; Kuna K; Klasnić K; Krolo I
Coll Antropol; 2013 Jun; 37(2):561-8. PubMed ID: 23941005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of carcinoma cervix using magnetic resonance imaging: correlation with clinical FIGO staging and impact on management.
Dhoot NM; Kumar V; Shinagare A; Kataki AC; Barmon D; Bhuyan U
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2012 Feb; 56(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 22339747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Invasive carcinoma of the cervix uteri (stage IB-IIB): evaluation using magnetic resonance].
Sironi S; Belloni C; Taccagni L; Del Maschio A
Radiol Med; 1990 Sep; 80(3):314-20. PubMed ID: 2236692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with carcinoma of the uterine cervix--3 years' experience].
Bosković V; Glisić A; Petković S
Srp Arh Celok Lek; 1998; 126(5-6):183-7. PubMed ID: 9863378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical staging and histopathological findings after radical hysterectomy in FIGO stage IIB cervical cancer.
Mandic A; Novakovic P; Mihajlovic O; Stojiljkovic B; Rajovic J; Davidovic M
J BUON; 2008; 13(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 18404786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The correlation of preoperative CT, MR imaging, and clinical staging (FIGO) with histopathology findings in primary cervical carcinoma.
Ozsarlak O; Tjalma W; Schepens E; Corthouts B; Op de Beeck B; Van Marck E; Parizel PM; De Schepper AM
Eur Radiol; 2003 Oct; 13(10):2338-45. PubMed ID: 12802611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopic surgical staging in cervical cancer--preliminary experience among Chinese.
Chu KK; Chang SD; Chen FP; Soong YK
Gynecol Oncol; 1997 Jan; 64(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 8995546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Role of imaging in pretreatment evaluation of early invasive cervical cancer: results of the intergroup study American College of Radiology Imaging Network 6651-Gynecologic Oncology Group 183.
Hricak H; Gatsonis C; Chi DS; Amendola MA; Brandt K; Schwartz LH; Koelliker S; Siegelman ES; Brown JJ; McGhee RB; Iyer R; Vitellas KM; Snyder B; Long HJ; Fiorica JV; Mitchell DG; ;
J Clin Oncol; 2005 Dec; 23(36):9329-37. PubMed ID: 16361632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Matched-case comparison for the role of surgery in FIGO stage Ib1-IIa squamous cell carcinoma of cervix and suspicious para-aortic lymph node metastasis.
Kim HS; Park NH; Wu HG; Cho JY; Chung HH; Kim JW; Song YS; Kim SH; Kang SB
Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Jan; 16(1):133-9. PubMed ID: 18979134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Value of magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of endometrial carcinoma according to International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (2009) staging criteria].
Du L; Lei Y; Li D; Qiu X; Liang B
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2012 Jun; 32(7):1048-51. PubMed ID: 22820597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is there a benefit of pretreatment laparoscopic transperitoneal surgical staging in patients with advanced cervical cancer?
Marnitz S; Köhler C; Roth C; Füller J; Hinkelbein W; Schneider A
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Dec; 99(3):536-44. PubMed ID: 16126259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Impact of 2009 FIGO staging system on the diagnostic value of preoperative MRI staging of endometrial carcinoma].
Yu XD; Ouyang H; Lin M; Zhou CW; Zhang R
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2011 Sep; 33(9):692-6. PubMed ID: 22340052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pretreatment staging of cervical cancer: is imaging better than palpation?: Role of CT and MRI in preoperative staging of cervical cancer: single institution results for 255 patients.
Hancke K; Heilmann V; Straka P; Kreienberg R; Kurzeder C
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):2856-61. PubMed ID: 18696156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Staging of cervix cancer using MRT].
Einspieler R; Ebner F; Hofmann HM; Ranner G; Tamussino K; Justich E
Rofo; 1990 Jan; 152(1):67-70. PubMed ID: 2154013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MR staging accuracy for endometrial cancer based on the new FIGO stage.
Shin KE; Park BK; Kim CK; Bae DS; Song SY; Kim B
Acta Radiol; 2011 Sep; 52(7):818-24. PubMed ID: 21742787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [MRI findings of uterine cervical cancer and value of MRI in preoperative staging].
Li XC; Shang JB; Wu XM; Zeng QS; Sun CP; He JX; Zhong ZW; Chen ZS
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2007 Mar; 27(3):352-4. PubMed ID: 17425990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimation of tumor volume in cervical cancer by magnetic resonance imaging.
Narayan K; McKenzie A; Fisher R; Susil B; Jobling T; Bernshaw D
Am J Clin Oncol; 2003 Oct; 26(5):e163-8. PubMed ID: 14528092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Tumor diameter and volume assessed by magnetic resonance imaging in the prediction of outcome for invasive cervical cancer.
Wagenaar HC; Trimbos JB; Postema S; Anastasopoulou A; van der Geest RJ; Reiber JH; Kenter GG; Peters AA; Pattynama PM
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Sep; 82(3):474-82. PubMed ID: 11520143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinicopathological variables predictive of clinical outcome in patients with FIGO stage Ib2-IIb cervical cancer treated with cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical hysterectomy.
Gadducci A; Teti G; Barsotti C; Tana R; Fanucchi A; Orlandini C; Fabrini MG; Genazzani AR
Anticancer Res; 2010 Jan; 30(1):201-8. PubMed ID: 20150636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MRI findings before and after abdominal radical trachelectomy (ART) for cervical cancer: a prospective study and review of the literature.
Bourgioti C; Koutoulidis V; Chatoupis K; Rodolakis A; Koureas A; Thomakos N; Moulopoulos LA
Clin Radiol; 2014 Jul; 69(7):678-86. PubMed ID: 24625691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
