These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23941326)

  • 1. Enhanced sensitivity employing zwitterionic and pI balancing dyes (Z-CyDyes) optimized for 2D-gel electrophoresis based on side chain modifications of CyDye fluorophores. New tools for use in proteomics and diagnostics.
    Epstein MG; Reeves BD; Maaty WS; Fouchard D; Dratz EA; Bothner B; Grieco PA
    Bioconjug Chem; 2013 Sep; 24(9):1552-61. PubMed ID: 23941326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Difference gel electrophoresis (DIGE) using CyDye DIGE fluor minimal dyes.
    Chakravarti B; Gallagher SR; Chakravarti DN
    Curr Protoc Mol Biol; 2005 Feb; Chapter 10():Unit 10.23. PubMed ID: 18265353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 2D-DIGE: comparative proteomics of cellular signalling pathways.
    Larbi NB; Jefferies C
    Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 517():105-32. PubMed ID: 19378013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of two combinations of cyanine dyes for prelabelling and gel electrophoresis.
    Tsolakos N; Techanukul T; Wallington A; Zhao Y; Jones C; Nagy J; Wheeler JX
    Proteomics; 2009 Mar; 9(6):1727-30. PubMed ID: 19242935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improving 2D-DIGE protein expression analysis by two-stage linear mixed models: assessing experimental effects in a melanoma cell study.
    Fernández EA; Girotti MR; López del Olmo JA; Llera AS; Podhajcer OL; Cantet RJ; Balzarini M
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Dec; 24(23):2706-12. PubMed ID: 18818217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative Testis Tissue Proteomics Using 2-Dye Versus 3-Dye DIGE Analysis.
    Holland A
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1664():185-202. PubMed ID: 29019134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Application of highly sensitive fluorescent dyes (CyDye DIGE Fluor saturation dyes) to laser microdissection and two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE) for cancer proteomics.
    Kondo T; Hirohashi S
    Nat Protoc; 2006; 1(6):2940-56. PubMed ID: 17406554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitative proteomics by fluorescent labeling of cysteine residues using a set of two cyanine-based or three rhodamine-based dyes.
    Volke D; Hoffmann R
    Electrophoresis; 2008 Nov; 29(22):4516-26. PubMed ID: 19035404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Difference gel electrophoresis based on lys/cys tagging.
    Westermeier R; Scheibe B
    Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 424():73-85. PubMed ID: 18369854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Proteomic expression of microfungal ripening starter Geotrichum candidum submitted to cold stress is strain-dependent: studies using 2d-dige technology and samespots software analysis.
    Missous G; Thammavongs B; Dieuleveux V; Houssin M; Henry J; Panoff JM
    Cryo Letters; 2012; 33(4):289-98. PubMed ID: 22987240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The development of the DIGE system: 2D fluorescence difference gel analysis technology.
    Marouga R; David S; Hawkins E
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2005 Jun; 382(3):669-78. PubMed ID: 15900442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The use of difference in-gel electrophoresis for quantitation of protein expression.
    Sapra R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 492():93-112. PubMed ID: 19241028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Simultaneous Two-Dimensional Difference Gel Electrophoresis (2D-DIGE) Analysis of Two Distinct Proteomes.
    Aquino A; Guest PC; Martins-de-Souza D
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1546():205-212. PubMed ID: 27896770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Proteomic analysis of redox- and ErbB2-dependent changes in mammary luminal epithelial cells using cysteine- and lysine-labelling two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis.
    Chan HL; Gharbi S; Gaffney PR; Cramer R; Waterfield MD; Timms JF
    Proteomics; 2005 Jul; 5(11):2908-26. PubMed ID: 15954156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Two-Dye Versus Three-Dye DIGE for Comparative Testis Tissue Proteomic Analysis.
    Holland A
    Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2596():245-263. PubMed ID: 36378444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Two-dimensional fluorescence difference gel electrophoresis for comparative proteomics profiling.
    Tannu NS; Hemby SE
    Nat Protoc; 2006; 1(4):1732-42. PubMed ID: 17487156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A fluorescent codetection system for immunoblotting and proteomics through ECL-Plex and CyDye labeling.
    McManus CA; Donoghue PM; Dunn MJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 536():515-26. PubMed ID: 19378088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis for protein profiling. Soluble proteins of the marine bacterium Pirellula sp. strain 1.
    Gade D; Thiermann J; Markowsky D; Rabus R
    J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol; 2003; 5(4):240-51. PubMed ID: 12867748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimizing the difference gel electrophoresis (DIGE) technology.
    Friedman DB; Lilley KS
    Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 428():93-124. PubMed ID: 18287770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Protein detection methods in proteomics research.
    Westermeier R; Marouga R
    Biosci Rep; 2005; 25(1-2):19-32. PubMed ID: 16222417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.