These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23941601)

  • 1. Comparison of poliglecaprone-25 and polyglactin-910 in cutaneous surgery.
    Regan T; Lawrence N
    Dermatol Surg; 2013 Sep; 39(9):1340-4. PubMed ID: 23941601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Equal cosmetic outcomes with 5-0 poliglecaprone-25 versus 6-0 polypropylene for superficial closures.
    Rosenzweig LB; Abdelmalek M; Ho J; Hruza GJ
    Dermatol Surg; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1126-9. PubMed ID: 20653727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new suture for hair transplantation: poliglecaprone 25.
    Bernstein RM; Rassman WR; Rashid N
    Dermatol Surg; 2001 Jan; 27(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 11231232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Photographic assessment of postsurgical facial scars epidermally sutured with rapidly absorbable polyglactin 910 or nylon: A randomized clinical trial.
    Moran B; Humphrey S; Seal A; Berkowitz J; Zloty D
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2020 Nov; 83(5):1395-1399. PubMed ID: 32534080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Knotting abilities of a new absorbable monofilament suture: poliglecaprone 25 (Monocryl).
    Trimbos JB; Niggebrugge A; Trimbos R; Van Rijssel EJ
    Eur J Surg; 1995 May; 161(5):319-22. PubMed ID: 7662774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Subcuticular skin closure at cesarean delivery with poliglecaprone-25 vs polyglactin-910: a randomized controlled trial.
    Sharma C; Sharma S; Soni A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2024 Feb; 6(2):101256. PubMed ID: 38109995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Subcuticular Suture Type for Skin Closure After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Buresch AM; Van Arsdale A; Ferzli M; Sahasrabudhe N; Sun M; Bernstein J; Bernstein PS; Ngai IM; Garry DJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Sep; 130(3):521-526. PubMed ID: 28796687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of barbed and smooth sutures for ovine cesarean delivery.
    Greenberg JA; Walden S; Hammer CM; Grazul-Bilska AT; Vonnahme KA
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2011 Jun; 113(3):215-7. PubMed ID: 21457976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A double-blind controlled trial of polyglytone 6211 versus poliglecaprone 25 for use in body contouring.
    Naghshineh N; Ota KS; Tang L; O'Toole J; Rubin JP
    Ann Plast Surg; 2010 Aug; 65(2):124-8. PubMed ID: 20585236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative study on biocompatibility and absorption times of three absorbable monofilament suture materials (Polydioxanone, Poliglecaprone 25, Glycomer 631).
    Molea G; Schonauer F; Bifulco G; D'Angelo D
    Br J Plast Surg; 2000 Mar; 53(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 10878837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Incisional hernia after abdominal closure with slowly absorbable versus fast absorbable, antibacterial-coated sutures.
    Justinger C; Slotta JE; Schilling MK
    Surgery; 2012 Mar; 151(3):398-403. PubMed ID: 22088813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro comparison of mechanical and degradation properties of equivalent absorbable suture materials from two different manufacturers.
    de la Puerta B; Parsons KJ; Draper ER; Moores AL; Moores AP
    Vet Surg; 2011 Feb; 40(2):223-7. PubMed ID: 21223313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A prospective controlled study of a 10/0 absorbable polyglactin suture for corneal incision phacoemulsification.
    Bainbridge JW; Teimory M; Kirwan JF; Rostron CK
    Eye (Lond); 1998; 12 ( Pt 3a)():399-402. PubMed ID: 9775239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of absorbable with nonabsorbable sutures in closure of facial skin wounds.
    Parell GJ; Becker GD
    Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2003; 5(6):488-90. PubMed ID: 14623686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Absorbable poliglecaprone 25 sutures for both subcutaneous and transepidermal closure: a cosmetically and economically appealing option.
    Yag-Howard C; Lavallee L
    Cutis; 2013 Jul; Suppl():19-23. PubMed ID: 24308153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Flat square knots: are 3 throws enough?
    Behm T; Unger JB; Ivy JJ; Mukherjee D
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Aug; 197(2):172.e1-3. PubMed ID: 17689639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Polyglactin sutures versus nylon sutures for suturing of conjunctival autograft in pterygium surgery: a randomized, controlled trial.
    Wong VW; Rao SK; Lam DS
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2007 Sep; 85(6):658-61. PubMed ID: 17376187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How do absorbable sutures absorb? A prospective double-blind randomized clinical study of tissue reaction to polyglactin 910 sutures in human skin.
    Cartmill BT; Parham DM; Strike PW; Griffiths L; Parkin B
    Orbit; 2014 Dec; 33(6):437-43. PubMed ID: 25244631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of Maxon suture with Vicryl, chromic catgut, and PDS sutures in fascial closure in rats.
    Sanz LE; Patterson JA; Kamath R; Willett G; Ahmed SW; Butterfield AB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Mar; 71(3 Pt 1):418-22. PubMed ID: 3126470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A randomised controlled trial of absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for skin closure after open carpal tunnel release.
    Theopold C; Potter S; Dempsey M; O'Shaughnessy M
    J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2012 May; 37(4):350-3. PubMed ID: 21987279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.