These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23941909)

  • 1. The capability of fiber Bragg grating sensors to measure amputees' trans-tibial stump/socket interface pressures.
    Al-Fakih EA; Osman NA; Eshraghi A; Adikan FR
    Sensors (Basel); 2013 Aug; 13(8):10348-57. PubMed ID: 23941909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conventional patellar-tendon-bearing (PTB) socket/stump interface dynamic pressure distributions recorded during the prosthetic stance phase of gait of a trans-tibial amputee.
    Convery P; Buis AW
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1998 Dec; 22(3):193-8. PubMed ID: 9881607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optical fiber Bragg grating-instrumented silicone liner for interface pressure measurement within prosthetic sockets of lower-limb amputees.
    Al-Fakih E; Arifin N; Pirouzi G; Mahamd Adikan FR; Shasmin HN; Abu Osman NA
    J Biomed Opt; 2017 Aug; 22(8):1-8. PubMed ID: 28822140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Two dimensional polymer-embedded quasi-distributed FBG pressure sensor for biomedical applications.
    Kanellos GT; Papaioannou G; Tsiokos D; Mitrogiannis C; Nianios G; Pleros N
    Opt Express; 2010 Jan; 18(1):179-86. PubMed ID: 20173837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Socket Interface Pressure and Amputee Reported Outcomes for Comfortable and Uncomfortable Conditions of Patellar Tendon Bearing Socket: A Pilot Study.
    Safari MR; Tafti N; Aminian G
    Assist Technol; 2015; 27(1):24-31; quiz 32-3. PubMed ID: 26132222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of pressure distributions between two types of sockets in a bulbous stump.
    Gholizadeh H; Abu Osman NA; Eshraghi A; Arifin N; Chung TY
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Aug; 40(4):509-16. PubMed ID: 25583929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Engineering a trans-tibial prosthetic socket for the lower limb amputee.
    Laing S; Lee PV; Goh JCh
    Ann Acad Med Singap; 2011 May; 40(5):252-9. PubMed ID: 21678017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relationship between socket pressure and EMG of two muscles in trans-femoral stumps during gait.
    Hong JH; Mun MS
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2005 Apr; 29(1):59-72. PubMed ID: 16180378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical investigation of the interface pressure in the trans-tibial socket with Dermo and Seal-In X5 liner during walking and their effect on patient satisfaction.
    Ali S; Osman NA; Mortaza N; Eshraghi A; Gholizadeh H; Wan Abas WA
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Nov; 27(9):943-8. PubMed ID: 22795863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A noncontact capacitive sensing system for recognizing locomotion modes of transtibial amputees.
    Zheng E; Wang L; Wei K; Wang Q
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2014 Dec; 61(12):2911-20. PubMed ID: 25014949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Socket/stump interface dynamic pressure distributions recorded during the prosthetic stance phase of gait of a trans-tibial amputee wearing a hydrocast socket.
    Convery P; Buis AW
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1999 Aug; 23(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 10493137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Laboratory and clinical tests of a prototype pressure sensor for clincial assessment of prosthetic socket fit.
    Polliack AA; Craig DD; Sieh RC; Landsberger S; Mcneal DR
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2002 Apr; 26(1):23-34. PubMed ID: 12043923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interface Pressure System to Compare the Functional Performance of Prosthetic Sockets during the Gait in People with Trans-Tibial Amputation.
    Ibarra Aguila S; Sánchez GJ; Sauvain EE; Alemon B; Fuentes-Aguilar RQ; Huegel JC
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Dec; 20(24):. PubMed ID: 33317006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interface pressure profile analysis for patellar tendon-bearing socket and hydrostatic socket.
    Moo EK; Osman NA; Pingguan-Murphy B; Abas WA; Spence WD; Solomonidis SE
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2009; 11(4):37-43. PubMed ID: 20405814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An experimental and theoretical framework for manufacturing prosthetic sockets for transtibial amputees.
    Faustini MC; Neptune RR; Crawford RH; Rogers WE; Bosker G
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2006 Sep; 14(3):304-10. PubMed ID: 17009490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Scoping Review of Pressure Measurements in Prosthetic Sockets of Transfemoral Amputees during Ambulation: Key Considerations for Sensor Design.
    Ko ST; Asplund F; Zeybek B
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jul; 21(15):. PubMed ID: 34372253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of liner stiffness for trans-tibial prosthesis: a finite element contact model.
    Lin CC; Chang CH; Wu CL; Chung KC; Liao IC
    Med Eng Phys; 2004 Jan; 26(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 14644593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of an air pneumatic suspension system for transtibial prostheses.
    Pirouzi G; Abu Osman NA; Oshkour AA; Ali S; Gholizadeh H; Abas WA
    Sensors (Basel); 2014 Sep; 14(9):16754-65. PubMed ID: 25207872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stump-socket interface pressure as an aid to socket design in prostheses for trans-femoral amputees--a preliminary study.
    Lee VS; Solomonidis SE; Spence WD
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 1997; 211(2):167-80. PubMed ID: 9184457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The development of a rapid prototyping prosthetic socket coated with a resin layer for transtibial amputees.
    Hsu LH; Huang GF; Lu CT; Hong DY; Liu SH
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2010 Mar; 34(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 19947824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.