These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2394193)

  • 21. Influence of mixing technique on some properties of PMMA bone cement.
    Eyerer P; Jin R
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1986 Oct; 20(8):1057-94. PubMed ID: 3782171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Differences in bone-cement porosity by vacuum mixing, centrifugation, and hand mixing.
    Macaulay W; DiGiovanni CW; Restrepo A; Saleh KJ; Walsh H; Crossett LS; Peterson MG; Li S; Salvati EA
    J Arthroplasty; 2002 Aug; 17(5):569-75. PubMed ID: 12168171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Vacuum mixing of acrylic bone cement.
    Wixson RL; Lautenschlager EP; Novak MA
    J Arthroplasty; 1987; 2(2):141-9. PubMed ID: 3612140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effect of centrifugation on the fracture properties of acrylic bone cements.
    Rimnac CM; Wright TM; McGill DL
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1986 Feb; 68(2):281-7. PubMed ID: 3944165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effect of the antimicrobial peptide, Dhvar-5, on gentamicin release from a polymethyl methacrylate bone cement.
    Faber C; Hoogendoorn RJ; Lyaruu DM; Stallmann HP; van Marle J; van Nieuw Amerongen A; Smit TH; Wuisman PI;
    Biomaterials; 2005 Oct; 26(28):5717-26. PubMed ID: 15878377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Vacuum-mixing cement does not decrease overall porosity in cemented femoral stems: an in vitro laboratory investigation.
    Messick KJ; Miller MA; Damron LA; Race A; Clarke MT; Mann KA
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Aug; 89(8):1115-21. PubMed ID: 17785755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Monomer leakage from polymerizing acrylic bone cement. An in vitro study on the influence of speed and duration of mixing, cement volume and surface area.
    Linder LG; Harthon L; Kullberg L
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1976 Sep; (119):242-9. PubMed ID: 954318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Particle size distribution and evolution in tablet structure during and after compaction.
    Fichtner F; Rasmuson A; Alderborn G
    Int J Pharm; 2005 Mar; 292(1-2):211-25. PubMed ID: 15725568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Porosity of various preparations of acrylic bone cements.
    Jasty M; Davies JP; O'Connor DO; Burke DW; Harrigan TP; Harris WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1990 Oct; (259):122-9. PubMed ID: 2208846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of preparation techniques on the porosity of acrylic cements.
    Schreurs BW; Spierings PT; Huiskes R; Slooff TJ
    Acta Orthop Scand; 1988 Aug; 59(4):403-9. PubMed ID: 3421077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Air inclusion in bone cement. Importance of the mixing technique.
    Lindén U; Gillquist J
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1989 Oct; (247):148-51. PubMed ID: 2490849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Influence of antibiotic impregnation on the fatigue life of Simplex P and Palacos R acrylic bone cements, with and without centrifugation.
    Davies JP; O'Connor DO; Burke DW; Harris WH
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1989 Apr; 23(4):379-97. PubMed ID: 2708414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Inter- and intra-batch variability in the handling characteristics and viscosity of commonly used antibiotic-loaded bone cements.
    Dall GF; Simpson PM; Mackenzie SP; Breusch SJ
    Acta Orthop; 2007 Jun; 78(3):412-20. PubMed ID: 17611857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Quantitative analysis of the effect of porosity on the fatigue strength of bone cement.
    Hoey D; Taylor D
    Acta Biomater; 2009 Feb; 5(2):719-26. PubMed ID: 18835229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Porosity in manually and machine mixed resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
    Covey DA; Ewoldsen NO
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(6):617-23. PubMed ID: 11699187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Is there any difference between vacuum mixing systems in reducing bone cement porosity?
    Wang JS; Toksvig-Larsen S; Müller-Wille P; Franźen H
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1996; 33(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 8736030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Strain-controlled fatigue of acrylic bone cement.
    Carter DR; Gates EI; Harris WH
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1982 Sep; 16(5):647-57. PubMed ID: 7130218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparative fatigue behavior of different bone cements.
    Gates EI; Carter DR; Harris WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1984 Oct; (189):294-9. PubMed ID: 6478701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A new bioactive bone cement: its histological and mechanical characterization.
    Nishimura N; Yamamuro T; Taguchi Y; Ikenaga M; Nakamura T; Kokubo T; Yoshihara S
    J Appl Biomater; 1991; 2(4):219-29. PubMed ID: 10149398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Fatigue properties of bone cement. Comparison of mixing techniques.
    Lindén U
    Acta Orthop Scand; 1989 Aug; 60(4):431-3. PubMed ID: 2816319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.