These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23942641)

  • 21. Spatial attention modulates sound localization in barn owls.
    Johnen A; Wagner H; Gaese BH
    J Neurophysiol; 2001 Feb; 85(2):1009-12. PubMed ID: 11160532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sound affects the speed of visual processing.
    Keetels M; Vroomen J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Jun; 37(3):699-708. PubMed ID: 20854000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. When one sees what the other hears: crossmodal attentional modulation for gazed and non-gazed upon auditory targets.
    Nuku P; Bekkering H
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):135-43. PubMed ID: 19819733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Multisensory-mediated auditory localization.
    Bolognini N; Leo F; Passamonti C; Stein BE; Làdavas E
    Perception; 2007; 36(10):1477-85. PubMed ID: 18265830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of lateralized cues on the processing of lateralized auditory stimuli.
    Schröger E; Eimer M
    Biol Psychol; 1996 Jun; 43(3):203-26. PubMed ID: 8831955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Dynamic modulation of visual detection by auditory cues in spatial neglect.
    Golay L; Hauert CA; Greber C; Schnider A; Ptak R
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(9):1258-65. PubMed ID: 15949510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Olfactory priming leads to faster sound localization.
    La Buissonnière-Ariza V; Frasnelli J; Collignon O; Lepore F
    Neurosci Lett; 2012 Jan; 506(2):188-92. PubMed ID: 22094382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over frontal eye fields disrupts visually cued auditory attention.
    Smith DT; Jackson SR; Rorden C
    Brain Stimul; 2009 Apr; 2(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 20502626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Location and frequency cues in auditory selective attention.
    Woods DL; Alain C; Diaz R; Rhodes D; Ogawa KH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Feb; 27(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 11248941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Competition between auditory and visual spatial cues during visual task performance.
    Koelewijn T; Bronkhorst A; Theeuwes J
    Exp Brain Res; 2009 Jun; 195(4):593-602. PubMed ID: 19436999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Visual biasing of auditory localization in azimuth and depth.
    Agganis BT; Muday JA; Schirillo JA
    Percept Mot Skills; 2010 Dec; 111(3):872-92. PubMed ID: 21319625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of same- and different-modality cues in a Posner task: extinction-type, spatial, and non-spatial deficits after right-hemispheric stroke.
    Schürmann M; Grumbt M; Heide W; Verleger R
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2003 May; 16(3):348-58. PubMed ID: 12706215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Estimating the intended sound direction of the user: toward an auditory brain-computer interface using out-of-head sound localization.
    Nambu I; Ebisawa M; Kogure M; Yano S; Hokari H; Wada Y
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(2):e57174. PubMed ID: 23437338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Type of auditory cues and apparatus influence how healthy young adults integrate sounds for dynamic balance.
    Arie L; Roginska A; Wu Y; Lin D; Olsen AF; Harel D; Lubetzky AV
    Exp Brain Res; 2024 May; 242(5):1225-1235. PubMed ID: 38526742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Seeing the light: exploring the Colavita visual dominance effect.
    Koppen C; Spence C
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Jul; 180(4):737-54. PubMed ID: 17333012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Transient spatial attention modulates distinct components of the auditory ERP.
    Tata MS; Prime DJ; McDonald JJ; Ward LM
    Neuroreport; 2001 Dec; 12(17):3679-82. PubMed ID: 11726773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. ERP evidence for cross-modal audiovisual effects of endogenous spatial attention within hemifields.
    Eimer M; van Velzen J; Driver J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Mar; 16(2):272-88. PubMed ID: 15068597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Auditory and visual capture during focused visual attention.
    Koelewijn T; Bronkhorst A; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1303-15. PubMed ID: 19803638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Interruption from irrelevant auditory and visual onsets even when attention is in a focused state.
    van der Lubbe RH; Postma A
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 164(4):464-71. PubMed ID: 15785951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Gaze shifts to auditory and visual stimuli in cats.
    Ruhland JL; Yin TC; Tollin DJ
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2013 Oct; 14(5):731-55. PubMed ID: 23749194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.