BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

477 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23942646)

  • 1. Interactions between benthic predators and zooplanktonic prey are affected by turbulent waves.
    Robinson HE; Finelli CM; Koehl MA
    Integr Comp Biol; 2013 Nov; 53(5):810-20. PubMed ID: 23942646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Plankton predation rates in turbulence: a study of the limitations imposed on a predator with a non-spherical field of sensory perception.
    Lewis DM; Bala SI
    J Theor Biol; 2006 Sep; 242(1):44-61. PubMed ID: 16542686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predation on the Invasive Copepod, Pseudodiaptomus forbesi, and Native Zooplankton in the Lower Columbia River: An Experimental Approach to Quantify Differences in Prey-Specific Feeding Rates.
    Adams JB; Bollens SM; Bishop JG
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0144095. PubMed ID: 26618851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Going with the flow: hydrodynamic cues trigger directed escapes from a stalking predator.
    Tuttle LJ; Robinson HE; Takagi D; Strickler JR; Lenz PH; Hartline DK
    J R Soc Interface; 2019 Feb; 16(151):20180776. PubMed ID: 30958200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Turbulence, Temperature, and Turbidity: The Ecomechanics of Predator-Prey Interactions in Fishes.
    Higham TE; Stewart WJ; Wainwright PC
    Integr Comp Biol; 2015 Jul; 55(1):6-20. PubMed ID: 25980563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. To eat and not be eaten: optimal foraging behaviour in suspension feeding copepods.
    Kiørboe T; Jiang H
    J R Soc Interface; 2013 Jan; 10(78):20120693. PubMed ID: 23075546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Waves affect predator-prey interactions between fish and benthic invertebrates.
    Gabel F; Stoll S; Fischer P; Pusch MT; Garcia XF
    Oecologia; 2011 Jan; 165(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 21104276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mechanisms and feasibility of prey capture in ambush-feeding zooplankton.
    Kiørboe T; Andersen A; Langlois VJ; Jakobsen HH; Bohr T
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2009 Jul; 106(30):12394-9. PubMed ID: 19622725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Shoaling behaviour enhances risk of predation from multiple predator guilds in a marine fish.
    Ford JR; Swearer SE
    Oecologia; 2013 Jun; 172(2):387-97. PubMed ID: 23124272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Flow disturbances generated by feeding and swimming zooplankton.
    Kiørboe T; Jiang H; Gonçalves RJ; Nielsen LT; Wadhwa N
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Aug; 111(32):11738-43. PubMed ID: 25071196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Volumetric quantification of fluid flow reveals fish's use of hydrodynamic stealth to capture evasive prey.
    Gemmell BJ; Adhikari D; Longmire EK
    J R Soc Interface; 2014 Jan; 11(90):20130880. PubMed ID: 24227312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does microplastic ingestion by zooplankton affect predator-prey interactions? An experimental study on larviphagy.
    Van Colen C; Vanhove B; Diem A; Moens T
    Environ Pollut; 2020 Jan; 256():113479. PubMed ID: 31679869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do intraspecific or interspecific interactions determine responses to predators feeding on a shared size-structured prey community?
    ten Brink H; Mazumdar AK; Huddart J; Persson L; Cameron TC
    J Anim Ecol; 2015 Mar; 84(2):414-26. PubMed ID: 25314614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Combined effects of turbulence and different predation regimes on zooplankton in highly colored water-implications for environmental change in lakes.
    Härkönen L; Pekcan-Hekim Z; Hellén N; Ojala A; Horppila J
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e111942. PubMed ID: 25375952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The interaction between suction feeding performance and prey escape response determines feeding success in larval fish.
    Sommerfeld N; Holzman R
    J Exp Biol; 2019 Sep; 222(Pt 17):. PubMed ID: 31395675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How zooplankton feed: mechanisms, traits and trade-offs.
    Kiørboe T
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2011 May; 86(2):311-39. PubMed ID: 20682007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Foraging strategy mediates ectotherm predator-prey responses to climate warming.
    Twardochleb LA; Treakle TC; Zarnetske PL
    Ecology; 2020 Nov; 101(11):e03146. PubMed ID: 32726861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Danger of zooplankton feeding: the fluid signal generated by ambush-feeding copepods.
    Kiørboe T; Jiang H; Colin SP
    Proc Biol Sci; 2010 Nov; 277(1698):3229-37. PubMed ID: 20538648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of habitat structure on prey mortality depends on predator and prey microhabitat use.
    Klecka J; Boukal DS
    Oecologia; 2014 Sep; 176(1):183-91. PubMed ID: 25085443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Zebra mussels affect benthic predator foraging success and habitat choice on soft sediments.
    Beekey MA; McCabe DJ; Marsden JE
    Oecologia; 2004 Sep; 141(1):164-70. PubMed ID: 15278426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.