These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23943051)

  • 1. Stiffness, compliance, resilience, and creep deformation: understanding implant-soft tissue dynamics in the augmented breast: fundamentals based on materials science.
    Vegas MR; Martin del Yerro JL
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2013 Oct; 37(5):922-30. PubMed ID: 23943051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Breast augmentation with extra-projected and high-cohesive Dual-Gel Prosthesis 510: a prospective study of 75 consecutive cases for a new method (the Zenith system).
    Riggio E
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Aug; 36(4):866-78. PubMed ID: 22484397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Double breast contour in primary aesthetic breast augmentation: incidence, prevention and treatment.
    Médard de Chardon V; Balaguer T; Chignon-Sicard B; Lebreton E
    Ann Plast Surg; 2010 Apr; 64(4):390-6. PubMed ID: 20224340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. One-stage augmentation combined with mastopexy: aesthetic results and patient satisfaction.
    Spear SL; Pelletiere CV; Menon N
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2004; 28(5):259-67. PubMed ID: 15529204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A system for breast implant selection based on patient tissue characteristics and implant-soft tissue dynamics.
    Tebbetts JB
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Apr; 109(4):1396-409; discussion 1410-5. PubMed ID: 11964998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relative implant volume and sensibility alterations after breast augmentation.
    Pitanguy I; Vaena M; Radwanski HN; Nunes D; Vargas AF
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2007; 31(3):238-43. PubMed ID: 17484059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Simultaneous augmentation mastopexy: a technique for maximum en bloc skin resection using the inverted-T pattern regardless of implant size, asymmetry, or ptosis.
    Eisenberg T
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Apr; 36(2):349-54. PubMed ID: 21853404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. "Tear-drop augmentation mastopexy": a technique to augment superior pole hollow.
    Ceydeli A; Freund RM
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2003; 27(6):425-32; discussion 433. PubMed ID: 14994167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimizing outcomes in breast augmentation: seven years of experience with the subfascial plane.
    Góes JC; Landecker A
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2003; 27(3):178-84. PubMed ID: 12925857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transaxillary muscle-splitting breast augmentation: experience with 160 cases.
    Lang Stümpfle R; Figueras Pereira-Lima L; Alves Valiati A; da Silva Mazzini G
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Apr; 36(2):343-8. PubMed ID: 22037573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Advantages and outcomes in subfascial breast augmentation: a two-year review of experience.
    Siclovan HR; Jomah JA
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2008 May; 32(3):426-31. PubMed ID: 18365270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prospective study comparing two brands of cohesive gel breast implants with anatomic shape: 5-year follow-up evaluation.
    Niechajev I; Jurell G; Lohjelm L
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2007; 31(6):697-710. PubMed ID: 17653683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Endoscopic-assisted transaxillary breast augmentation: minimizing complications and maximizing results with improvements in patient selection and technique.
    Kolker AR; Austen WG; Slavin SA
    Ann Plast Surg; 2010 May; 64(5):667-73. PubMed ID: 20395798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Approaching revisional surgery in augmentation and mastopexy/augmentation patients.
    Dickinson BP; Handel N
    Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Jan; 68(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 21587043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Breast augmentation, antibiotic prophylaxis, and infection: comparative analysis of 1,628 primary augmentation mammoplasties assessing the role and efficacy of antibiotics prophylaxis duration.
    Khan UD
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2010 Feb; 34(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 19841968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Viscoelastic properties of a synthetic meniscus implant.
    Shemesh M; Asher R; Zylberberg E; Guilak F; Linder-Ganz E; Elsner JJ
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Jan; 29():42-55. PubMed ID: 24055793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Possible future development of implants and breast augmentation.
    Maxwell GP; Gabriel A
    Clin Plast Surg; 2009 Jan; 36(1):167-72, viii. PubMed ID: 19055971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of proteolytic treatment on plastic deformation of porcine aortic tissue.
    Kratzberg JA; Walker PJ; Rikkers E; Raghavan ML
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2009 Jan; 2(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 19627809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-dimensional evaluation of breast augmentation and the influence of anatomic and round implants on operative breast shape changes.
    Kovacs L; Eder M; Zimmermann A; Müller D; Schuster T; Papadopulos NA; Biemer E; Klöppel M; Machens HG
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Aug; 36(4):879-87. PubMed ID: 22535137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Grafts and implants in nasal and chin augmentation. A rational approach to material selection.
    Adams JS
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1987 Nov; 20(4):913-30. PubMed ID: 3320875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.