300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23943311)
1. Anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: comparison of stapled versus compression anastomosis.
Dauser B; Braunschmid T; Ghaffari S; Riss S; Stift A; Herbst F
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2013 Oct; 398(7):957-64. PubMed ID: 23943311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Can transanal tube placement after anterior resection for rectal carcinoma reduce anastomotic leakage rate? A single-institution prospective randomized study.
Xiao L; Zhang WB; Jiang PC; Bu XF; Yan Q; Li H; Zhang YJ; Yu F
World J Surg; 2011 Jun; 35(6):1367-77. PubMed ID: 21437746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effectiveness of a Transanal Drainage Tube for the Prevention of Anastomotic Leakage after Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer.
Wang Z; Liang J; Chen J; Mei S; Liu Q
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2020 May; 21(5):1441-1444. PubMed ID: 32458653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Single-stapled anastomosis is associated with a lower anastomotic leak rate than double-stapled technique after minimally invasive total mesorectal excision for MRI-defined low rectal cancer.
Foppa C; Carvello M; Maroli A; Sacchi M; Gramellini M; Montorsi M; Spinelli A
Surgery; 2023 Jun; 173(6):1367-1373. PubMed ID: 36967334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Efficacy of transanal hand-sewn reinforcement in low rectal stapled anastomosis in preventing anastomotic leak after transanal total mesorectal excision].
Jie HQ; Li Z; Luo SL; Liu ZZ; Zhang XW; Luan L; Liang WF; Hu HX; Kang L
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Jun; 24(6):530-535. PubMed ID: 34148318
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of stapled versus hand-sewn techniques for colo- rectal anastomosis after low anterior resection of mid-rectal carcinoma: a study on 50 patients.
Fayek IS
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(13):5427-31. PubMed ID: 25041013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bowel dysfunction after anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic sphincter-saving operative intervention for rectal cancer: A case-matched study in 46 patients using the Low Anterior Resection Score.
Hain E; Manceau G; Maggiori L; Mongin C; Prost À la Denise J; Panis Y
Surgery; 2017 Apr; 161(4):1028-1039. PubMed ID: 27894710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Risk factors of coloanal anastomotic stricture after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer].
Zhang B; Zhuo GZ; Tian L; Zhao K; Zhao Y; Zhao YJ; Zhu J; Zhang T; Ding JH
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Aug; 22(8):755-761. PubMed ID: 31422614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Determining the protective characteristics and risk factors for the development of anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
Suzuki N; Yoshida S; Tomochika S; Nakagami Y; Shindo Y; Tokumitsu Y; Iida M; Takeda S; Hazama S; Ueno T; Nagano H
Surg Today; 2021 May; 51(5):713-720. PubMed ID: 33006668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transanal Transection and Single-Stapled Anastomosis (TTSS): A comparison of anastomotic leak rates with the double-stapled technique and with transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer.
Spinelli A; Foppa C; Carvello M; Sacchi M; De Lucia F; Clerico G; Carrano FM; Maroli A; Montorsi M; Heald RJ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Dec; 47(12):3123-3129. PubMed ID: 34384655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Control Comparison of the New EndoWrist and Traditional Laparoscopic Staplers for Anterior Rectal Resection with the Da Vinci Xi: A Case Study.
Guadagni S; Di Franco G; Gianardi D; Palmeri M; Ceccarelli C; Bianchini M; Furbetta N; Caprili G; D'Isidoro C; Moglia A; Melfi F; Buccianti P; Mosca F; Morelli L
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2018 Dec; 28(12):1422-1427. PubMed ID: 29920142
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Intra-operative double-stapled colorectal or coloanal anastomotic complications of laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: double-stapled anastomotic complication could result in persistent anastomotic leakage.
Kim JH; Kim HY; Lee IK; Oh ST; Kim JG; Lee YS
Surg Endosc; 2015 Nov; 29(11):3117-24. PubMed ID: 25519426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predicting the risk and diminishing the consequences of anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer.
Moran BJ
Acta Chir Iugosl; 2010; 57(3):47-50. PubMed ID: 21066983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Anastomotic leakage after low rectal stapler anastomosis: significance of intraoperative anastomotic testing.
Schmidt O; Merkel S; Hohenberger W
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2003 Apr; 29(3):239-43. PubMed ID: 12657233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Effect of anastomotic reinforcing sutures on the incidence of anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial].
He Y; Zhu Z; Liu S; Liu L; Hu B; Wan X; Huang Q
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Apirl 25; 21(4):431-436. PubMed ID: 29682715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Recurrence of rectal anastomotic leakage following stoma closure: assessment of risk factors.
Kitaguchi D; Nishizawa Y; Sasaki T; Tsukada Y; Ikeda K; Ito M
Colorectal Dis; 2019 Nov; 21(11):1304-1311. PubMed ID: 31199545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rectal tube drainage reduces major anastomotic leakage after minimally invasive rectal cancer surgery.
Yang CS; Choi GS; Park JS; Park SY; Kim HJ; Choi JI; Han KS
Colorectal Dis; 2016 Dec; 18(12):O445-O452. PubMed ID: 27611180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of reinforcing sutures and trans-anal drainage tube on the outcome of laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: propensity score‑matched analysis.
Zhang HQ; Xu L; Wang ZL; Shao Y; Chen Y; Lu YF; Fu Z
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2023 Jul; 408(1):289. PubMed ID: 37515648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of symptomatic anastomotic leakage following laparoscopic and open low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis of 1014 consecutive patients.
Katsuno H; Shiomi A; Ito M; Koide Y; Maeda K; Yatsuoka T; Hase K; Komori K; Minami K; Sakamoto K; Saida Y; Saito N
Surg Endosc; 2016 Jul; 30(7):2848-56. PubMed ID: 26487228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: comparison of stapled and manual coloanal anastomosis.
Cong JC; Chen CS; Ma MX; Xia ZX; Liu DS; Zhang FY
Colorectal Dis; 2014 May; 16(5):353-8. PubMed ID: 24460588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
