These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23943492)

  • 21. How do I get a paper accepted?
    DeMaria AN
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2007 Apr; 49(15):1666-1667. PubMed ID: 17433960
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Open access under scrutiny.
    Samkange-Zeeb F; Zeeb H
    J Radiol Prot; 2013 Dec; 33(4):885-6. PubMed ID: 24285443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. About case reports and the perverse application of reasonable principles.
    Goihman-Yahr M
    Int J Dermatol; 2016 Jan; 55(1):117-9. PubMed ID: 26739633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. About case reports and the perverse application of reasonable principles.
    El-Azhary RA
    Int J Dermatol; 2016 Jan; 55(1):120. PubMed ID: 26739634
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Training and experience of peer reviewers: is being a "good reviewer" a persistent quality?
    García-Doval I
    PLoS Med; 2007 Mar; 4(3):e144; author reply e145. PubMed ID: 17388682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. How should medical journals deal with errors?
    Majeed A
    J R Soc Med; 2012 Feb; 105(2):51-2. PubMed ID: 22357977
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. On metrics.
    Heinemann MK
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2013 Aug; 61(5):377-8. PubMed ID: 23918700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Improving the quality of Pakistani medical journals: another perspective.
    Siddiqi AE; Younus M; Siddiqi N
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2007 Aug; 57(8):428. PubMed ID: 17902533
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Circulation: cardiovascular quality and outcomes annual report, 2012.
    Krumholz HM; Spertus JA
    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2012 Jul; 5(4):e28-32. PubMed ID: 22811507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Training and experience of peer reviewers: an additional variable to consider.
    Kulstad E
    PLoS Med; 2007 Mar; 4(3):e143; author reply e145. PubMed ID: 17388681
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. More on peer review: quality control for a costly product.
    Newton M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2008 Sep; 15(6):439-42. PubMed ID: 18696135
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Authentication of cell lines: ignore at your peril!
    Freshney RI
    Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2008 Mar; 8(3):311-4. PubMed ID: 18366279
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A survey of parameters involved in the establishment of new lines of human embryonic stem cells.
    Fraga AM; Souza de Araújo ÉS; Stabellini R; Vergani N; Pereira LV
    Stem Cell Rev Rep; 2011 Nov; 7(4):775-81. PubMed ID: 21416256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Impact, quality and inclusiveness in Australasian Journal on Ageing.
    Parkinson L
    Australas J Ageing; 2017 Mar; 36(1):8. PubMed ID: 28326687
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Editorial: Thoughts on improving the quality of manuscripts submitted to the journal of pediatric psychology: writing a convincing introduction.
    Drotar D
    J Pediatr Psychol; 2009; 34(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 19036783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Perceived journal quality: an indicator of research quality.
    Fahy K; Fenwick J
    Women Birth; 2008 Sep; 21(3):97-8. PubMed ID: 18657498
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Ongoing and new challenges of our journal.
    von Eckardstein A; Negrini S
    Atherosclerosis; 2018 Feb; 269():252-253. PubMed ID: 29439804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinical research design and reporting: always room for improvement!
    Heddle NM; Ness P
    Transfusion; 2007 Jan; 47(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 17207221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Meaningful peer review is integral to quality science and should provide benefits to the authors and reviewers alike.
    Carrell DT; Rajpert-De Meyts E
    Andrology; 2013 Jul; 1(4):531-2. PubMed ID: 23785017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Keeping Women and Birth at the cutting edge of quality journal publishing.
    Fahy K
    Women Birth; 2014 Mar; 27(1):1. PubMed ID: 24656389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.