These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23943497)

  • 1. Textures shape the attentional focus: evidence from exogenous and endogenous cueing.
    Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Schubö A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Nov; 75(8):1644-66. PubMed ID: 23943497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interactions between voluntary and stimulus-driven spatial attention mechanisms across sensory modalities.
    Santangelo V; Olivetti Belardinelli M; Spence C; Macaluso E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 21(12):2384-97. PubMed ID: 19199406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adults with dyslexia can use cues to orient and constrain attention but have a smaller and weaker attention spotlight.
    Moores E; Tsouknida E; Romani C
    Vision Res; 2015 Jun; 111(Pt A):55-65. PubMed ID: 25872179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of central and peripheral cueing on perceptual and saccade performance.
    Moehler T; Fiehler K
    Vision Res; 2018 Feb; 143():26-33. PubMed ID: 29262304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bias-free double judgment accuracy during spatial attention cueing: performance enhancement from voluntary and involuntary attention.
    Pack W; Klein SA; Carney T
    Vision Res; 2014 Dec; 105():204-12. PubMed ID: 25159288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Investigating the role of exogenous cueing on selection history formation.
    Grubb MA; Christensen G; Albanese J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Aug; 26(4):1282-1288. PubMed ID: 30924059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Uncued and cued dynamics measured by response classification.
    Shimozaki SS
    J Vis; 2010 Jul; 10(8):10. PubMed ID: 20884585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cross-modal cueing in audiovisual spatial attention.
    Blurton SP; Greenlee MW; Gondan M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Oct; 77(7):2356-76. PubMed ID: 26001381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Facilitation and inhibition mechanisms of human visuospatial attention in a non-search task.
    Facoetti A
    Neurosci Lett; 2001 Jan; 298(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 11154832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The cued recognition task: dissociating the abrupt onset effect from the social and arrow cueing effect.
    Xu B; Tanaka JW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jan; 77(1):97-110. PubMed ID: 25190323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Both dorsal and ventral attention network nodes are implicated in exogenously driven visuospatial anticipation.
    Ahrens MM; Veniero D; Freund IM; Harvey M; Thut G
    Cortex; 2019 Aug; 117():168-181. PubMed ID: 30981955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of temporal predictability on exogenous attentional modulation of feedforward processing in the striate cortex.
    Dassanayake TL; Michie PT; Fulham R
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 Jul; 105():9-16. PubMed ID: 27114044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bias corrected double judgment accuracy during spatial attention cueing: unmasked stimuli with non-predictive and semi-predictive cues.
    Pack W; Klein SA; Carney T
    Vision Res; 2014 Dec; 105():213-25. PubMed ID: 25130410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Revising the link between microsaccades and the spatial cueing of voluntary attention.
    Meyberg S; Sinn P; Engbert R; Sommer W
    Vision Res; 2017 Apr; 133():47-60. PubMed ID: 28163059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Different effects of exogenous cues in a visual detection and discrimination task: delayed attention withdrawal and/or speeded motor inhibition?
    Van der Lubbe RH; Vogel RO; Postma A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1829-40. PubMed ID: 16356322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spatial and feature-based effects of exogenous cueing on visual motion processing.
    Busse L; Katzner S; Treue S
    Vision Res; 2006 Jun; 46(13):2019-27. PubMed ID: 16476463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Selection for encoding: No evidence of better endogenous orienting following forget than following remember instructions.
    Rubinfeld LM; Taylor TL; Hamm JP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jan; 81(1):237-252. PubMed ID: 30194621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Graded Neuronal Modulations Related to Visual Spatial Attention.
    Mayo JP; Maunsell JH
    J Neurosci; 2016 May; 36(19):5353-61. PubMed ID: 27170131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture.
    Huang W; Su Y; Zhen Y; Qu Z
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):650-62. PubMed ID: 26879628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Orienting attention to locations in internal representations.
    Griffin IC; Nobre AC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Nov; 15(8):1176-94. PubMed ID: 14709235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.