These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23943555)

  • 1. Crossing the arms confuses the clocks: sensory feedback and the bimanual advantage.
    Studenka BE; Eliasz KL; Shore DI; Balasubramaniam R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Apr; 21(2):390-7. PubMed ID: 23943555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of multiple internal timekeepers and sources of feedback on interval timing.
    Studenka BE; Cummins DL; Pope MA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Sep; 71(9):1960-1967. PubMed ID: 28854855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual feedback is not important for bimanual human interval timing.
    Studenka BE; Cummins DL; Myers K
    Psychol Res; 2021 Mar; 85(2):857-864. PubMed ID: 31982935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The contribution of tactile reafference to temporal regularity during bimanual finger tapping.
    Drewing K; Hennings M; Aschersleben G
    Psychol Res; 2002 Feb; 66(1):60-70. PubMed ID: 11963279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mutual influences of intermodal visual/tactile apparent motion and auditory motion with uncrossed and crossed arms.
    Jiang Y; Chen L
    Multisens Res; 2013; 26(1-2):19-51. PubMed ID: 23713198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Crossing the hands increases illusory self-touch.
    Pozeg P; Rognini G; Salomon R; Blanke O
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e94008. PubMed ID: 24699795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reduced timing variability during bimanual coupling: a role for sensory information.
    Drewing K; Aschersleben G
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Feb; 56(2):329-50. PubMed ID: 12613567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. To bridge or not to bridge the multisensory time gap: bimanual coordination to sound and touch with temporal lags.
    Roy C; Dalla Bella S; Lagarde J
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Jan; 235(1):135-151. PubMed ID: 27655357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Role of Visual and Haptic Feedback During Dynamically Coupled Bimanual Manipulation.
    Contu S; Hughes CM; Masia L
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2016; 9(4):536-547. PubMed ID: 27655023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Delayed auditory feedback in repetitive tapping: a role for the sensory goal.
    Drewing K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(1):51-68. PubMed ID: 22823478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Common intentional binding effects across diverse sensory modalities in touch-free voluntary actions.
    Liu J; Chen L; Gu J; Buidze T; Zhao K; Liu CH; Zhang Y; Gläscher J; Fu X
    Conscious Cogn; 2024 Aug; 123():103727. PubMed ID: 38972289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Self-touch affects motor imagery: a study on posture interference effect.
    Conson M; Mazzarella E; Trojano L
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Nov; 215(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 21947174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fingers crossed! An investigation of somatotopic representations using spatial directional judgements.
    de Haan AM; Anema HA; Dijkerman HC
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e45408. PubMed ID: 23028989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bimanual and unimanual length perception.
    Panday V; Bergmann Tiest WM; Kappers AM
    Exp Brain Res; 2014 Sep; 232(9):2827-33. PubMed ID: 24792507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Concurrent use of somatotopic and external reference frames in a tactile mislocalization task.
    Tamè L; Wühle A; Petri CD; Pavani F; Braun C
    Brain Cogn; 2017 Feb; 111():25-33. PubMed ID: 27816777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does the crossed-limb deficit affect the uncrossed portions of limbs?
    Azañón E; Radulova S; Haggard P; Longo MR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1320-31. PubMed ID: 26986180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Age-related changes in the bimanual advantage and in brain oscillatory activity during tapping movements suggest a decline in processing sensory reafference.
    Sallard E; Spierer L; Ludwig C; Deiber MP; Barral J
    Exp Brain Res; 2014 Feb; 232(2):469-79. PubMed ID: 24232976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Timing of bimanual movements and deafferentation: implications for the role of sensory movement effects.
    Drewing K; Stenneken P; Cole J; Prinz W; Aschersleben G
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Sep; 158(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 15007586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. When two hands are better than one: reduced timing variability during bimanual movements.
    Helmuth LL; Ivry RB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1996 Apr; 22(2):278-93. PubMed ID: 8934844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Motor Planning Influences the Perceived Timing of Vibrotactile Stimuli in an Amplitude-Dependent Manner.
    Hermosillo RJ; Carmody J; Ugoalah N; Lee JH; Binsted G; van Donkelaar P
    J Mot Behav; 2017; 49(2):172-178. PubMed ID: 27715495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.