334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23943628)
1. MR imaging of articular cartilage at 1.5T and 3.0T: comparison of IDEAL 2D FSE and 3D SPGR with fat-saturated 2D FSE and 3D SPGR in a porcine model.
Cha JG; Yoo JH; Rhee SJ; Hwang SS; Han JK
Acta Radiol; 2014 May; 55(4):462-9. PubMed ID: 23943628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. IDEAL 3D spoiled gradient echo of the articular cartilage of the knee on 3.0 T MRI: a comparison with conventional 3.0 T fast spin-echo T2 fat saturation image.
Han CH; Park HJ; Lee SY; Chung EC; Choi SH; Yun JS; Rho MH
Acta Radiol; 2015 Dec; 56(12):1479-86. PubMed ID: 25348476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. High-resolution proton density weighted three-dimensional fast spin echo (3D-FSE) of the knee with IDEAL at 1.5 Tesla: comparison with 3D-FSE and 2D-FSE--initial experience.
McMahon CJ; Madhuranthakam AJ; Wu JS; Yablon CM; Wei JL; Rofsky NM; Hochman MG
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Feb; 35(2):361-9. PubMed ID: 22034221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical usefulness of adding 3D cartilage imaging sequences to a routine knee MR protocol.
Kijowski R; Blankenbaker DG; Woods M; Del Rio AM; De Smet AA; Reeder SB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jan; 196(1):159-67. PubMed ID: 21178062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Isotropic 3-dimensional fast spin echo imaging versus standard 2-dimensional imaging at 3.0 T of the knee: artificial cartilage and meniscal lesions in a porcine model.
Ristow O; Stehling C; Krug R; Steinbach L; Sabo G; Ambekar A; Huber M; Link TM
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010; 34(2):260-9. PubMed ID: 20351518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MRI findings in injured articular cartilage of the knee correlated with surgical findings.
Li XM; Peng WJ; Wu H; Kacher D; Xia LM; Ai F; Li F; Xiong W
Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Nov; 122(21):2624-30. PubMed ID: 19951582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparison between pig lumbar zypapophyseal joint cartilage acquired from multiple magnetic resonance image sequences and gross specimens].
Liao H; Yu W; Wang W; Liao Y
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2010 Oct; 35(10):1064-72. PubMed ID: 21051831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fat-suppressed spoiled GRASS imaging of knee hyaline cartilage: technique optimization and comparison with conventional MR imaging.
Disler DG; Peters TL; Muscoreil SJ; Ratner LM; Wagle WA; Cousins JP; Rifkin MD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Oct; 163(4):887-92. PubMed ID: 8092029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage of the knee: comparison between fat-suppressed three-dimensional SPGR imaging, fat-suppressed FSE imaging, and fat-suppressed three-dimensional DEFT imaging, and correlation with arthroscopy.
Yoshioka H; Stevens K; Hargreaves BA; Steines D; Genovese M; Dillingham MF; Winalski CS; Lang P
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Nov; 20(5):857-64. PubMed ID: 15503323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fat suppression gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging of experimental articular cartilage lesions: comparison between phase-contrast method at 0.23T and chemical shift selective method at 1.5T.
Palosaari K; Ojala R; Blanco-Sequeiros R; Tervonen O
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Aug; 18(2):225-31. PubMed ID: 12884336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Volumetric cartilage measurements of porcine knee at 1.5-T and 3.0-T MR imaging: evaluation of precision and accuracy.
Bauer JS; Krause SJ; Ross CJ; Krug R; Carballido-Gamio J; Ozhinsky E; Majumdar S; Link TM
Radiology; 2006 Nov; 241(2):399-406. PubMed ID: 17057067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the articular cartilage of the knee joint with vastly undersampled isotropic projection reconstruction steady-state free precession imaging.
Kijowski R; Lu A; Block W; Grist T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Jul; 24(1):168-75. PubMed ID: 16758476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MR imaging of articular cartilage at 1.5T and 3.0T: comparison of SPGR and SSFP sequences.
Kornaat PR; Reeder SB; Koo S; Brittain JH; Yu H; Andriacchi TP; Gold GE
Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2005 Apr; 13(4):338-44. PubMed ID: 15780647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. MR imaging of knee cartilage with FEMR.
Vasnawala SS; Pauly JM; Nishimura DG; Gold GE
Skeletal Radiol; 2002 Oct; 31(10):574-80. PubMed ID: 12324826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High-resolution 3D cartilage imaging with IDEAL SPGR at 3 T.
Siepmann DB; McGovern J; Brittain JH; Reeder SB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Dec; 189(6):1510-5. PubMed ID: 18029893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the Articular Cartilage of the Knee Joint Using an Isotropic Resolution 3D Fast Spin-Echo Sequence With Conventional and Radial Reformatted Images.
Gustas CN; Blankenbaker DG; Rio AM; Winalski CS; Kijowski R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Aug; 205(2):371-9. PubMed ID: 26204290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MR arthrography of the hip: comparison of IDEAL-SPGR volume sequence to standard MR sequences in the detection and grading of cartilage lesions.
Blankenbaker DG; Ullrick SR; Kijowski R; Davis KW; De Smet AA; Shinki K; Muñoz del Rio A; Keene JS
Radiology; 2011 Dec; 261(3):863-71. PubMed ID: 21900621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection of knee hyaline cartilage defects using fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging: comparison with standard MR imaging and correlation with arthroscopy.
Disler DG; McCauley TR; Wirth CR; Fuchs MD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):377-82. PubMed ID: 7618561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 3.0-T evaluation of knee cartilage by using three-dimensional IDEAL GRASS imaging: comparison with fast spin-echo imaging.
Kijowski R; Blankenbaker DG; Woods MA; Shinki K; De Smet AA; Reeder SB
Radiology; 2010 Apr; 255(1):117-27. PubMed ID: 20173102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Differentiation between grade 3 and grade 4 articular cartilage defects of the knee: fat-suppressed proton density-weighted versus fat-suppressed three-dimensional gradient-echo MRI.
Lee SY; Jee WH; Kim SK; Koh IJ; Kim JM
Acta Radiol; 2010 May; 51(4):455-61. PubMed ID: 20350249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
