519 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23945531)
1. Complex abdominal wall reconstruction: an outcomes review.
Henry CR; Bradburn E; Moyer KE
Ann Plast Surg; 2013 Sep; 71(3):266-8. PubMed ID: 23945531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Outcomes Analysis of Biologic Mesh Use for Abdominal Wall Reconstruction in Clean-Contaminated and Contaminated Ventral Hernia Repair.
Sbitany H; Kwon E; Chern H; Finlayson E; Varma MG; Hansen SL
Ann Plast Surg; 2015 Aug; 75(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 24317239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Indications and outcomes following complex abdominal reconstruction with component separation combined with porcine acellular dermal matrix reinforcement.
Patel KM; Nahabedian MY; Gatti M; Bhanot P
Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Oct; 69(4):394-8. PubMed ID: 22156887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Primary fascial closure with biologic mesh reinforcement results in lesser complication and recurrence rates than bridged biologic mesh repair for abdominal wall reconstruction: A propensity score analysis.
Giordano S; Garvey PB; Baumann DP; Liu J; Butler CE
Surgery; 2017 Feb; 161(2):499-508. PubMed ID: 27810091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Primary fascial closure with mesh reinforcement is superior to bridged mesh repair for abdominal wall reconstruction.
Booth JH; Garvey PB; Baumann DP; Selber JC; Nguyen AT; Clemens MW; Liu J; Butler CE
J Am Coll Surg; 2013 Dec; 217(6):999-1009. PubMed ID: 24083910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Single institutional experience using biological mesh for abdominal wall reconstruction.
Iacco A; Adeyemo A; Riggs T; Janczyk R
Am J Surg; 2014 Sep; 208(3):480-4; discussion 483-4. PubMed ID: 24462172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcomes of abdominal wall reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix are not affected by wound contamination.
Garvey PB; Martinez RA; Baumann DP; Liu J; Butler CE
J Am Coll Surg; 2014 Nov; 219(5):853-64. PubMed ID: 25440025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Abdominal wall reconstruction: a case series of ventral hernia repair using the component separation technique with biologic mesh.
Hood K; Millikan K; Pittman T; Zelhart M; Secemsky B; Rajan M; Myers J; Luu M
Am J Surg; 2013 Mar; 205(3):322-7; discussion 327-8. PubMed ID: 23351508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A 5-year clinical experience with single-staged repairs of infected and contaminated abdominal wall defects utilizing biologic mesh.
Rosen MJ; Krpata DM; Ermlich B; Blatnik JA
Ann Surg; 2013 Jun; 257(6):991-6. PubMed ID: 23426340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The use of porcine acellular dermal matrix in a bridge technique for complex abdominal wall reconstruction: an outcome analysis.
Patel KM; Nahabedian MY; Albino F; Bhanot P
Am J Surg; 2013 Feb; 205(2):209-12. PubMed ID: 23195145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Impact of Mesh Reinforcement with Components Separation for Abdominal Wall Reconstruction.
Razavi SA; Desai KA; Hart AM; Thompson PW; Losken A
Am Surg; 2018 Jun; 84(6):959-962. PubMed ID: 29981631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Open retromuscular mesh repair of complex incisional hernia: predictors of wound events and recurrence.
Cobb WS; Warren JA; Ewing JA; Burnikel A; Merchant M; Carbonell AM
J Am Coll Surg; 2015 Apr; 220(4):606-13. PubMed ID: 25797746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcomes with porcine acellular dermal matrix versus synthetic mesh and suture in complicated open ventral hernia repair.
Liang MK; Berger RL; Nguyen MT; Hicks SC; Li LT; Leong M
Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2014 Oct; 15(5):506-12. PubMed ID: 25215466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Immediate, Multistaged Approach to Infected Synthetic Mesh: Outcomes After Abdominal Wall Reconstruction With Porcine Acellular Dermal Matrix.
Albino FP; Patel KM; Nahabedian MY; Attinger CE; Bhanot P
Ann Plast Surg; 2015 Dec; 75(6):629-33. PubMed ID: 24667884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Noncrosslinked porcine-derived acellular dermal matrix for single-stage complex abdominal wall herniorrhaphy after removal of infected synthetic mesh: a retrospective review.
Guerra O
Am Surg; 2014 May; 80(5):489-95. PubMed ID: 24887729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcome of abdominal wall hernia repair with biologic mesh: Permacol™ versus Strattice™.
Cheng AW; Abbas MA; Tejirian T
Am Surg; 2014 Oct; 80(10):999-1002. PubMed ID: 25264647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Repair of recurrent hernia after biologic mesh failure in abdominal wall reconstruction.
Purnell CA; Souza JM; Park E; Dumanian GA
Am J Surg; 2014 Nov; 208(5):788-793. PubMed ID: 25118163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Perfect Plane: A Systematic Review of Mesh Location and Outcomes, Update 2018.
Sosin M; Nahabedian MY; Bhanot P
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Sep; 142(3 Suppl):107S-116S. PubMed ID: 30138278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessing complications and cost-utilization in ventral hernia repair utilizing biologic mesh in a bridged underlay technique.
Basta MN; Fischer JP; Kovach SJ
Am J Surg; 2015 Apr; 209(4):695-702. PubMed ID: 25305799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Abdominal Wall Reconstruction with Concomitant Ostomy-Associated Hernia Repair: Outcomes and Propensity Score Analysis.
Mericli AF; Garvey PB; Giordano S; Liu J; Baumann DP; Butler CE
J Am Coll Surg; 2017 Mar; 224(3):351-361.e2. PubMed ID: 27965133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
