243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23945955)
1. How linguistic closure and verbal working memory relate to speech recognition in noise--a review.
Besser J; Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
Trends Amplif; 2013 Jun; 17(2):75-93. PubMed ID: 23945955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. New measures of masked text recognition in relation to speech-in-noise perception and their associations with age and cognitive abilities.
Besser J; Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Rönnberg J; Festen JM
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Feb; 55(1):194-209. PubMed ID: 22199191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of working memory capacity and semantic cues on the intelligibility of speech in noise.
Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Rönnberg J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2225-34. PubMed ID: 23967952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reading Behind the Lines: The Factors Affecting the Text Reception Threshold in Hearing Aid Users.
Zekveld AA; Pronk M; Danielsson H; Rönnberg J
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 61(3):762-775. PubMed ID: 29450534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robust relationship between reading span and speech recognition in noise.
Souza P; Arehart K
Int J Audiol; 2015; 54(10):705-13. PubMed ID: 25975360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Contribution of Individual Differences in Memory Span and Language Ability to Spatial Release From Masking in Young Children.
MacCutcheon D; Pausch F; Füllgrabe C; Eccles R; van der Linde J; Panebianco C; Fels J; Ljung R
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Oct; 62(10):3741-3751. PubMed ID: 31619115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Speech-in-speech listening on the LiSN-S test by older adults with good audiograms depends on cognition and hearing acuity at high frequencies.
Besser J; Festen JM; Goverts ST; Kramer SE; Pichora-Fuller MK
Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):24-41. PubMed ID: 25207850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of informational masking on speech perception and pupil response in adults with hearing impairment.
Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Festen JM; Kramer SE
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1596-606. PubMed ID: 24606294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cognitive abilities relate to self-reported hearing disability.
Zekveld AA; George EL; Houtgast T; Kramer SE
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Oct; 56(5):1364-72. PubMed ID: 23838985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of age, hearing, and working memory on the speech comprehension benefit derived from an automatic speech recognition system.
Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):262-72. PubMed ID: 19194286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Linguistic, perceptual, and cognitive factors underlying musicians' benefits in noise-degraded speech perception.
Yoo J; Bidelman GM
Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():189-195. PubMed ID: 30978607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dynamic relation between working memory capacity and speech recognition in noise during the first 6 months of hearing aid use.
Ng EH; Classon E; Larsby B; Arlinger S; Lunner T; Rudner M; Rönnberg J
Trends Hear; 2014 Nov; 18():. PubMed ID: 25421088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of Age and Working Memory Capacity on Speech Recognition Performance in Noise Among Listeners With Normal Hearing.
Gordon-Salant S; Cole SS
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):593-602. PubMed ID: 27232071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measuring cognitive factors in speech comprehension: the value of using the Text Reception Threshold test as a visual equivalent of the SRT test.
Kramer SE; Zekveld AA; Houtgast T
Scand J Psychol; 2009 Oct; 50(5):507-15. PubMed ID: 19778398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lexical-Access Ability and Cognitive Predictors of Speech Recognition in Noise in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
Kaandorp MW; Smits C; Merkus P; Festen JM; Goverts ST
Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517743887. PubMed ID: 29205095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pupil Responses of Adults With Traumatic Brain Injury During Processing of Speech in Noise.
Koelewijn T; van Haastrecht JAP; Kramer SE
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518811444. PubMed ID: 30482105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The development of the text reception threshold test: a visual analogue of the speech reception threshold test.
Zekveld AA; George EL; Kramer SE; Goverts ST; Houtgast T
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Jun; 50(3):576-84. PubMed ID: 17538101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effects of stimulus modality, task complexity, and cuing on working memory and the relationship with speech recognition in older cochlear implant users.
Luo X; Azuma T; Kolberg C; Pulling KR
J Commun Disord; 2022; 95():106170. PubMed ID: 34839068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relationship Between Working Memory and Speech-in-Noise Recognition in Young and Older Adult Listeners With Age-Appropriate Hearing.
Vermeire K; Knoop A; De Sloovere M; Bosch P; van den Noort M
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Sep; 62(9):3545-3553. PubMed ID: 31433720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
