BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23946335)

  • 1. Factors influencing ascertainment bias of microsatellite allele sizes: impact on estimates of mutation rates.
    Li B; Kimmel M
    Genetics; 2013 Oct; 195(2):563-72. PubMed ID: 23946335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantifying ascertainment bias and species-specific length differences in human and chimpanzee microsatellites using genome sequences.
    Vowles EJ; Amos W
    Mol Biol Evol; 2006 Mar; 23(3):598-607. PubMed ID: 16301296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microsatellites are molecular clocks that support accurate inferences about history.
    Sun JX; Mullikin JC; Patterson N; Reich DE
    Mol Biol Evol; 2009 May; 26(5):1017-27. PubMed ID: 19221007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ascertainment bias cannot entirely account for human microsatellites being longer than their chimpanzee homologues.
    Cooper G; Rubinsztein DC; Amos W
    Hum Mol Genet; 1998 Sep; 7(9):1425-9. PubMed ID: 9700197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microsatellite length differences between humans and chimpanzees at autosomal Loci are not found at equivalent haploid Y chromosomal Loci.
    Kayser M; Vowles EJ; Kappei D; Amos W
    Genetics; 2006 Aug; 173(4):2179-86. PubMed ID: 16783019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microsatellite allele frequencies in humans and chimpanzees, with implications for constraints on allele size.
    Garza JC; Slatkin M; Freimer NB
    Mol Biol Evol; 1995 Jul; 12(4):594-603. PubMed ID: 7659015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimation of hominoid ancestral population sizes under bayesian coalescent models incorporating mutation rate variation and sequencing errors.
    Burgess R; Yang Z
    Mol Biol Evol; 2008 Sep; 25(9):1979-94. PubMed ID: 18603620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microsatellite evolution inferred from human-chimpanzee genomic sequence alignments.
    Webster MT; Smith NG; Ellegren H
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2002 Jun; 99(13):8748-53. PubMed ID: 12070344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Directional evolution of size coupled with ascertainment bias for variation in Drosophila microsatellites.
    Amos W; Hutter CM; Schug MD; Aquadro CF
    Mol Biol Evol; 2003 Apr; 20(4):660-2. PubMed ID: 12679547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microsatellite evolution: testing the ascertainment bias hypothesis.
    Crawford AM; Kappes SM; Paterson KA; deGotari MJ; Dodds KG; Freking BA; Stone RT; Beattie CW
    J Mol Evol; 1998 Feb; 46(2):256-60. PubMed ID: 9452528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A fine-scale comparison of the human and chimpanzee genomes: linkage, linkage disequilibrium and sequence analysis.
    Crouau-Roy B; Service S; Slatkin M; Freimer N
    Hum Mol Genet; 1996 Aug; 5(8):1131-7. PubMed ID: 8842732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microsatellite variation in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans: a reciprocal test of the ascertainment bias hypothesis.
    Hutter CM; Schug MD; Aquadro CF
    Mol Biol Evol; 1998 Dec; 15(12):1620-36. PubMed ID: 9866198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biased mutations and microsatellite variation.
    Zhivotovsky LA; Feldman MW; Grishechkin SA
    Mol Biol Evol; 1997 Sep; 14(9):926-33. PubMed ID: 9287425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Microsatellite evolutionary rate and pattern in Schistocerca gregaria inferred from direct observation of germline mutations.
    Chapuis MP; Plantamp C; Streiff R; Blondin L; Piou C
    Mol Ecol; 2015 Dec; 24(24):6107-19. PubMed ID: 26562076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Forward-time simulations of human populations with complex diseases.
    Peng B; Amos CI; Kimmel M
    PLoS Genet; 2007 Mar; 3(3):e47. PubMed ID: 17381243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sequence differences at orthologous microsatellites inflate estimates of human-chimpanzee differentiation.
    Kwong M; Pemberton TJ
    BMC Genomics; 2014 Nov; 15():990. PubMed ID: 25407736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inter-allelic interactions play a major role in microsatellite evolution.
    Amos W; Kosanović D; Eriksson A
    Proc Biol Sci; 2015 Nov; 282(1818):20152125. PubMed ID: 26511050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Allele excess at neutrally evolving microsatellites and the implications for tests of neutrality.
    Schlötterer C; Kauer M; Dieringer D
    Proc Biol Sci; 2004 Apr; 271(1541):869-74. PubMed ID: 15255107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bayes estimation of species divergence times and ancestral population sizes using DNA sequences from multiple loci.
    Rannala B; Yang Z
    Genetics; 2003 Aug; 164(4):1645-56. PubMed ID: 12930768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is microsatellite mutational asymmetry detectable in allele frequency distributions?
    Swinton J; Amos B
    IMA J Math Appl Med Biol; 2002 Dec; 19(4):257-73. PubMed ID: 12828364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.