298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23947646)
1. Free energy calculations to estimate ligand-binding affinities in structure-based drug design.
Reddy MR; Reddy CR; Rathore RS; Erion MD; Aparoy P; Reddy RN; Reddanna P
Curr Pharm Des; 2014; 20(20):3323-37. PubMed ID: 23947646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Advances in binding free energies calculations: QM/MM-based free energy perturbation method for drug design.
Rathore RS; Sumakanth M; Reddy MS; Reddanna P; Rao AA; Erion MD; Reddy MR
Curr Pharm Des; 2013; 19(26):4674-86. PubMed ID: 23260025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Calculate protein-ligand binding affinities with the extended linear interaction energy method: application on the Cathepsin S set in the D3R Grand Challenge 3.
He X; Man VH; Ji B; Xie XQ; Wang J
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 Jan; 33(1):105-117. PubMed ID: 30218199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Towards predictive ligand design with free-energy based computational methods?
Foloppe N; Hubbard R
Curr Med Chem; 2006; 13(29):3583-608. PubMed ID: 17168725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How Well Does the Extended Linear Interaction Energy Method Perform in Accurate Binding Free Energy Calculations?
Hao D; He X; Ji B; Zhang S; Wang J
J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Dec; 60(12):6624-6633. PubMed ID: 33213150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative assessment of QM-based and MM-based models for prediction of protein-ligand binding affinity trends.
Maier S; Thapa B; Erickson J; Raghavachari K
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2022 Jun; 24(23):14525-14537. PubMed ID: 35661842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. End-Point Binding Free Energy Calculation with MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA: Strategies and Applications in Drug Design.
Wang E; Sun H; Wang J; Wang Z; Liu H; Zhang JZH; Hou T
Chem Rev; 2019 Aug; 119(16):9478-9508. PubMed ID: 31244000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Understanding the impact of binding free energy and kinetics calculations in modern drug discovery.
Adediwura VA; Koirala K; Do HN; Wang J; Miao Y
Expert Opin Drug Discov; 2024 Jun; 19(6):671-682. PubMed ID: 38722032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of an automated procedure for the prediction of relative free energies of binding on a set of aldose reductase inhibitors.
Ferrari AM; Degliesposti G; Sgobba M; Rastelli G
Bioorg Med Chem; 2007 Dec; 15(24):7865-77. PubMed ID: 17870536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Absolute binding free energy calculations: on the accuracy of computational scoring of protein-ligand interactions.
Singh N; Warshel A
Proteins; 2010 May; 78(7):1705-23. PubMed ID: 20186976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using physics-based pose predictions and free energy perturbation calculations to predict binding poses and relative binding affinities for FXR ligands in the D3R Grand Challenge 2.
Athanasiou C; Vasilakaki S; Dellis D; Cournia Z
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):21-44. PubMed ID: 29119352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Large scale free energy calculations for blind predictions of protein-ligand binding: the D3R Grand Challenge 2015.
Deng N; Flynn WF; Xia J; Vijayan RS; Zhang B; He P; Mentes A; Gallicchio E; Levy RM
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):743-751. PubMed ID: 27562018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Calculation of protein-ligand binding affinities.
Gilson MK; Zhou HX
Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct; 2007; 36():21-42. PubMed ID: 17201676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Calculation of relative binding free energy differences for fructose 1,6-bisphosphatase inhibitors using the thermodynamic cycle perturbation approach.
Reddy MR; Erion MD
J Am Chem Soc; 2001 Jul; 123(26):6246-52. PubMed ID: 11427047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energy Calculations with FEP.
Wang L; Chambers J; Abel R
Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 2022():201-232. PubMed ID: 31396905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing the performance of the molecular mechanics/Poisson Boltzmann surface area and molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area methods. II. The accuracy of ranking poses generated from docking.
Hou T; Wang J; Li Y; Wang W
J Comput Chem; 2011 Apr; 32(5):866-77. PubMed ID: 20949517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing the Performance of MM/PBSA, MM/GBSA, and QM-MM/GBSA Approaches on Protein/Carbohydrate Complexes: Effect of Implicit Solvent Models, QM Methods, and Entropic Contributions.
Mishra SK; Koča J
J Phys Chem B; 2018 Aug; 122(34):8113-8121. PubMed ID: 30084252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations in Drug Discovery: Recent Advances and Practical Considerations.
Cournia Z; Allen B; Sherman W
J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Dec; 57(12):2911-2937. PubMed ID: 29243483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 10. Prediction reliability of binding affinities and binding poses for RNA-ligand complexes.
Jiang D; Du H; Zhao H; Deng Y; Wu Z; Wang J; Zeng Y; Zhang H; Wang X; Wang E; Hou T; Hsieh CY
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2024 Mar; 26(13):10323-10335. PubMed ID: 38501198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accommodating protein flexibility for structure-based drug design.
Lin JH
Curr Top Med Chem; 2011; 11(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 20939792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
