These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23947964)
1. Value of research and value of development in early assessments of new medical technologies. Retèl VP; Grutters JP; van Harten WH; Joore MA Value Health; 2013; 16(5):720-8. PubMed ID: 23947964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness of the 21-gene assay for guiding adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in early breast cancer. Paulden M; Franek J; Pham B; Bedard PL; Trudeau M; Krahn M Value Health; 2013; 16(5):729-39. PubMed ID: 23947965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Using the 21-gene assay to guide adjuvant chemotherapy decision-making in early-stage breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness evaluation in the German setting. Blohmer JU; Rezai M; Kümmel S; Kühn T; Warm M; Friedrichs K; Benkow A; Valentine WJ; Eiermann W J Med Econ; 2013; 16(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 22966753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. When is enough evidence enough? - Using systematic decision analysis and value-of-information analysis to determine the need for further evidence. Siebert U; Rochau U; Claxton K Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2013; 107(9-10):575-84. PubMed ID: 24315327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-effectiveness of the 70-gene signature versus St. Gallen guidelines and Adjuvant Online for early breast cancer. Retèl VP; Joore MA; Knauer M; Linn SC; Hauptmann M; Harten WH Eur J Cancer; 2010 May; 46(8):1382-91. PubMed ID: 20359886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Scenario drafting to anticipate future developments in technology assessment. Retèl VP; Joore MA; Linn SC; Rutgers EJ; van Harten WH BMC Res Notes; 2012 Aug; 5():442. PubMed ID: 22894140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Genomic profile of breast cancer: cost-effectiveness analysis from the Spanish National Healthcare System perspective. Seguí MÁ; Crespo C; Cortés J; Lluch A; Brosa M; Becerra V; Chiavenna SM; Gracia A Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2014 Dec; 14(6):889-99. PubMed ID: 25213317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Alternative decision modelling techniques for the evaluation of health care technologies: Markov processes versus discrete event simulation. Karnon J Health Econ; 2003 Oct; 12(10):837-48. PubMed ID: 14508868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Early assessment of medical technologies to inform product development and market access: a review of methods and applications. Ijzerman MJ; Steuten LM Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2011 Sep; 9(5):331-47. PubMed ID: 21875163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Complementing the net benefit approach: a new framework for Bayesian cost-effectiveness analysis. Hernández MA; Vázquez-Polo FJ; González-Torre FJ; Bas EM Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Oct; 25(4):537-45. PubMed ID: 19845984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness of extended adjuvant letrozole therapy after 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy in postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer. Delea TE; Karnon J; Smith RE; Johnston SR; Brandman J; Sung JC; Gross PE Am J Manag Care; 2006 Jul; 12(7):374-86. PubMed ID: 16834524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Short-course adjuvant trastuzumab therapy in early stage breast cancer in Finland: cost-effectiveness and value of information analysis based on the 5-year follow-up results of the FinHer Trial. Purmonen TT; Pänkäläinen E; Turunen JH; Asseburg C; Martikainen JA Acta Oncol; 2011 Apr; 50(3):344-52. PubMed ID: 21299447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Head-to-head comparison of the 70-gene signature versus the 21-gene assay: cost-effectiveness and the effect of compliance. Retèl VP; Joore MA; van Harten WH Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Jan; 131(2):627-36. PubMed ID: 21947677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The option value of delay in health technology assessment. Eckermann S; Willan AR Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 18480035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Economic evaluation of intensive chemotherapy with prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for patients with high-risk early breast cancer in Japan. Ishiguro H; Kondo M; Hoshi SL; Takada M; Nakamura S; Teramukai S; Yanagihara K; Toi M Clin Ther; 2010 Feb; 32(2):311-26. PubMed ID: 20206789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Expected value of information and decision making in HTA. Eckermann S; Willan AR Health Econ; 2007 Feb; 16(2):195-209. PubMed ID: 16981193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Benefit and projected cost-effectiveness of anastrozole versus tamoxifen as initial adjuvant therapy for patients with early-stage estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Hillner BE Cancer; 2004 Sep; 101(6):1311-22. PubMed ID: 15368322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Constructive Technology Assessment (CTA) as a tool in coverage with evidence development: the case of the 70-gene prognosis signature for breast cancer diagnostics. Retèl VP; Bueno-de-Mesquita JM; Hummel MJ; van de Vijver MJ; Douma KF; Karsenberg K; van Dam FS; van Krimpen C; Bellot FE; Roumen RM; Linn SC; van Harten WH Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Jan; 25(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 19126254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure--a model to assess the economic value of this new medical technology. Banz K; Value Health; 2005; 8(2):128-39. PubMed ID: 15804321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness analysis of trastuzumab in the adjuvant setting for treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer. Garrison LP; Lubeck D; Lalla D; Paton V; Dueck A; Perez EA Cancer; 2007 Aug; 110(3):489-98. PubMed ID: 17592827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]