These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23948283)

  • 1. Thinking dirty about surrogates: a case of prolonging life to prove paternity.
    Naylor HM; Sparlin JA; Caplan JP
    Psychosomatics; 2013; 54(6):608-9. PubMed ID: 23948283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Refusal of hydration and nutrition: irrelevance of the "artificial" vs "natural" distinction.
    Truog RD; Cochrane TI
    Arch Intern Med; 2005 Dec 12-26; 165(22):2574-6. PubMed ID: 16344412
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Shattering the neutral surrogate myth in end-of-life decisionmaking: Terri Schiavo and her family.
    Shepherd L
    Cumberland Law Rev; 2004-2005; 35(3):575-95. PubMed ID: 16715563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dominions of surrogate opinions: who is in charge?
    Jones JW; McCullough LB
    J Vasc Surg; 2009 Jan; 49(1):249-50. PubMed ID: 19174262
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Someone to watch over me: medical decision-making for hopelessly ill incompetent adult patients.
    Dippel DL
    Akron Law Rev; 1991; 24(3-4):639-80. PubMed ID: 16144098
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. End-of-life lawmaking.
    N Y Times Web; 2006 Apr; ():CY17. PubMed ID: 16649279
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Discontinuing life support in comatose patients: an example from Canadian case law.
    Godlovitch G; Mitchell I; Doig CJ
    CMAJ; 2005 Apr; 172(9):1172-3. PubMed ID: 15851705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Considering the boundaries of decision-making authority: An NHS Trust v Y [2018] UKSC 46.
    Richards B
    J Bioeth Inq; 2019 Jun; 16(2):153-157. PubMed ID: 31134416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Culture wars in New York state: ongoing political resistance by religious groups to the Family Health Care Decisions Act.
    Freer J; Wear S
    Christ Bioeth; 2002 Apr; 8(1):9-24. PubMed ID: 12956144
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Twenty propositions.
    Tonti-Filippini N; Fleming J; Walsh M
    Hum Life Rev; 2004; 30(1):83-109. PubMed ID: 15856595
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exercising the right to die: a proposal for New York.
    Caffera SM
    Syracuse Law Rev; 1991; 42(4):1189-240. PubMed ID: 16130264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The health care agent: protecting the choices and interests of patients who lack capacity.
    Swidler RN
    N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1988; 6(1):1-61. PubMed ID: 16998980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The precarious role of the courts: surrogate health care decisionmaking.
    Fader JF
    MD Law Rev; 1994; 53(4):1193-219. PubMed ID: 12599351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Substituted judgments in the absence of surrogates.
    Sadovnikoff N; Jurchak M
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Oct; 35(10):2467-8. PubMed ID: 17885404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Wendland case--withdrawing life support from incompetent patients who are not terminally ill.
    Lo B; Dornbrand L; Wolf LE; Groman M
    N Engl J Med; 2002 May; 346(19):1489-93. PubMed ID: 12000822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Wendland case.
    Bernstein M
    N Engl J Med; 2002 Oct; 347(14):1119. PubMed ID: 12362023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nancy Cruzan and the best interest standard.
    Veatch RM
    Midwest Med Ethics; 1990; 6(4):17-9. PubMed ID: 16038072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Withdrawing life-sustaining treatment from minimally conscious patients: who decides?
    Anderson BJ
    J Med Pract Manage; 2002; 18(2):101-3. PubMed ID: 12389332
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surrogates have not been shown to make inaccurate substituted judgments.
    Broström L; Johansson M
    J Clin Ethics; 2009; 20(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 19845202
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Implementation of the French law related to the patients' rights and the end of life].
    Lienhart A; Puybasset L; Beloucif S; Boulard G;
    Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 2006 May; 25(5):491-2. PubMed ID: 16600562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.