These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23948390)

  • 1. Locus of backward crosstalk effects on task 1 in a psychological refractory period task.
    Ko YT; Miller J
    Exp Psychol; 2014 Jan; 61(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 23948390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Introspection about backward crosstalk in dual-task performance.
    Bratzke D; Janczyk M
    Psychol Res; 2021 Mar; 85(2):605-617. PubMed ID: 31974636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identifying the locus of compatibility-based backward crosstalk: Evidence from an extended PRP paradigm.
    Janczyk M; Renas S; Durst M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Feb; 44(2):261-276. PubMed ID: 28557494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Backward response-level crosstalk in the psychological refractory period paradigm.
    Miller J; Alderton M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):149-65. PubMed ID: 16478333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electrophysiological examination of response-related interference while dual-tasking: is it motoric or attentional?
    Jung KH; Martin T; Ruthruff E
    Psychol Res; 2021 Mar; 85(2):660-678. PubMed ID: 32020364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Separating limits on preparation versus online processing in multitasking paradigms: Evidence for resource models.
    Mittelstädt V; Miller J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Jan; 43(1):89-102. PubMed ID: 27808552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Backward crosstalk effects in psychological refractory period paradigms: effects of second-task response types on first-task response latencies.
    Miller J
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):484-93. PubMed ID: 16237555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The source of execution-related dual-task interference: motor bottleneck or response monitoring?
    Bratzke D; Rolke B; Ulrich R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1413-26. PubMed ID: 19803646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relationships among visual awareness, reaction time, and lateralized readiness potential in a simple reaction time task under the backward masking paradigm.
    Suzuki K; Imanaka K
    Percept Mot Skills; 2009 Aug; 109(1):187-207. PubMed ID: 19831100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How Social and Refractory Is the Social Psychological Refractory Period?
    Wühr P; Heuer H
    Exp Psychol; 2017 Jul; 64(4):273-281. PubMed ID: 28922997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Information continuity across the response selection bottleneck: early parallel Task 2 response activation contributes to overt Task 2 performance.
    Thomson SJ; Watter S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Jul; 75(5):934-53. PubMed ID: 23592183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dissociating sources of dual-task interference using human electrophysiology.
    Arnell KM; Helion AM; Hurdelbrink JA; Pasieka B
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Feb; 11(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 15116990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evidence for a response preparation bottleneck during dual-task performance: effect of a startling acoustic stimulus on the psychological refractory period.
    Maslovat D; Chua R; Spencer HC; Forgaard CJ; Carlsen AN; Franks IM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Nov; 144(3):481-7. PubMed ID: 24076331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dual-task interference and response strategies in simulated car driving: impact of first-task characteristics on the psychological refractory period effect.
    Bock O; Wechsler K; Koch I; Schubert T
    Psychol Res; 2021 Mar; 85(2):568-576. PubMed ID: 31776662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stopping while going! Response inhibition does not suffer dual-task interference.
    Yamaguchi M; Logan GD; Bissett PG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Feb; 38(1):123-34. PubMed ID: 21574740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrophysiological evidence against parallel motor processing during multitasking.
    Mittelstädt V; Mackenzie IG; Leuthold H; Miller J
    Psychophysiology; 2022 Jan; 59(1):e13951. PubMed ID: 34628652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The motor locus of no-go backward crosstalk.
    Durst M; Janczyk M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1931-1946. PubMed ID: 29683705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the locus of dual-task interference: Is there a bottleneck at the stimulus classification stage?
    Johnston JC; McCann RS
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Apr; 59(4):694-719. PubMed ID: 16707358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Backward compatibility effects in younger and older adults.
    Hartley AA; Maquestiaux F; Festini SB; Frazier K; Krimmer PJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jul; 78(5):1337-50. PubMed ID: 27146993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The locus of the emotional Stroop effect: a study with the PRP paradigm.
    Janczyk M; Augst S; Kunde W
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Sep; 151():8-15. PubMed ID: 24904999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.