These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23948563)

  • 21. Why, how, and how far should microbiological contamination in a coastal zone be mitigated? An application of the systems approach to the Thau lagoon (France).
    Mongruel R; Vanhoutte-Brunier A; Fiandrino A; Valette F; Ballé-Béganton J; Pérez Agúndez JA; Gallai N; Derolez V; Roussel S; Lample M; Laugier T
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Mar; 118():55-71. PubMed ID: 23399879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Optimal and objective placement of sensors in water distribution systems using information theory.
    Khorshidi MS; Nikoo MR; Sadegh M
    Water Res; 2018 Oct; 143():218-228. PubMed ID: 29960176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Real-time contaminant detection and classification in a drinking water pipe using conventional water quality sensors: techniques and experimental results.
    Jeffrey Yang Y; Haught RC; Goodrich JA
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Jun; 90(8):2494-506. PubMed ID: 19269081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Using data mining techniques to isolate chemical intrusion in water distribution systems.
    Barros DB; Cardoso SM; Oliveira E; Brentan B; Ribeiro L
    Environ Monit Assess; 2022 Feb; 194(3):203. PubMed ID: 35182211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Optimal water quality monitoring network design for river systems.
    Telci IT; Nam K; Guan J; Aral MM
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Jul; 90(10):2987-98. PubMed ID: 19501953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The microelectronic wireless nitrate sensor network for environmental water monitoring.
    Gartia MR; Braunschweig B; Chang TW; Moinzadeh P; Minsker BS; Agha G; Wieckowski A; Keefer LL; Liu GL
    J Environ Monit; 2012 Dec; 14(12):3068-75. PubMed ID: 23138753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A dynamic thresholds scheme for contaminant event detection in water distribution systems.
    Arad J; Housh M; Perelman L; Ostfeld A
    Water Res; 2013 Apr; 47(5):1899-908. PubMed ID: 23384516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Better understanding of water quality evolution in water distribution networks using data clustering.
    Mandel P; Maurel M; Chenu D
    Water Res; 2015 Dec; 87():69-78. PubMed ID: 26378733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Real-time water quality monitoring using Internet of Things in SCADA.
    Saravanan K; Anusuya E; Kumar R; Son LH
    Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Aug; 190(9):556. PubMed ID: 30159608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Quantitative risk-based approach for improving water quality management in mining.
    Liu W; Moran CJ; Vink S
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Sep; 45(17):7459-64. PubMed ID: 21797262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Development of an integrated analysis procedure for three-ways layout field surveys data in lakes.
    Kitpati S; Fujii S; Shimizu Y
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(9):283-94. PubMed ID: 16445199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A real time method of contaminant classification using conventional water quality sensors.
    Liu S; Che H; Smith K; Chang T
    J Environ Manage; 2015 May; 154():13-21. PubMed ID: 25700352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Measuring the embodied energy in drinking water supply systems: a case study in the Great Lakes region.
    Mo W; Nasiri F; Eckelman MJ; Zhang Q; Zimmerman JB
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Dec; 44(24):9516-21. PubMed ID: 21105699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Adaptive sensor placement and boundary estimation for monitoring mass objects.
    Guo Z; Zhou M; Jiang G
    IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern; 2008 Feb; 38(1):222-32. PubMed ID: 18270093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Interpreting drinking water quality in the distribution system using Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence.
    Sadiq R; Rodriguez MJ
    Chemosphere; 2005 Apr; 59(2):177-88. PubMed ID: 15722089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Pollution source localization in an urban water supply network based on dynamic water demand.
    Yan X; Zhu Z; Li T
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Jun; 26(18):17901-17910. PubMed ID: 29079984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Low-cost failure sensor design and development for water pipeline distribution systems.
    Khan K; Widdop PD; Day AJ; Wood AS; Mounce SR; Machell J
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(4-5):207-15. PubMed ID: 11936636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Fluorescence monitoring at a recycled water treatment plant and associated dual distribution system--implications for cross-connection detection.
    Hambly AC; Henderson RK; Storey MV; Baker A; Stuetz RM; Khan SJ
    Water Res; 2010 Oct; 44(18):5323-33. PubMed ID: 20655084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Water monitoring system for oil contamination using polymer-coated quartz crystal microbalance chemical sensor.
    Ueyama S; Hijikata K; Hirotsuji J
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(4-5):175-80. PubMed ID: 11936631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Optimization of water quality monitoring network in a large river by combining measurements, a numerical model and matter-element analyses.
    Chen Q; Wu W; Blanckaert K; Ma J; Huang G
    J Environ Manage; 2012 Nov; 110():116-24. PubMed ID: 22776756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.