332 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23948703)
1. Minilaparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: multi-institutional experience in comparison with conventional laparoscopy.
Ghezzi F; Fanfani F; Malzoni M; Uccella S; Fagotti A; Cosentino F; Cromi A; Scambia G
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2013 Oct; 39(10):1094-100. PubMed ID: 23948703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Nerve-sparing minilaparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer patients.
Ghezzi F; Cromi A; Uccella S; Bogani G; Sturla D; Serati M; Bolis P
Surg Innov; 2013 Oct; 20(5):493-501. PubMed ID: 23339145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy for stage IB2-IIB cervical cancer in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a multi-institutional cohort study.
Ghezzi F; Cromi A; Ditto A; Vizza E; Malzoni M; Raspagliesi F; Uccella S; Corrado G; Cosentino F; Gotsch F; Martinelli F; Franchi M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Jun; 20(6):2007-15. PubMed ID: 23224830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mini-laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in early cervical cancer patients. A multi-institutional study.
Corrado G; Fanfani F; Ghezzi F; Fagotti A; Uccella S; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Stevenazzi G; Scambia G; Vizza E
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 25468748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Implementation of laparoscopic approach for type B radical hysterectomy: a comparison with open surgical operations.
Ditto A; Martinelli F; Bogani G; Gasparri ML; Di Donato V; Zanaboni F; Lorusso D; Raspagliesi F
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 25468458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of laparascopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and radical abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.
Steed H; Rosen B; Murphy J; Laframboise S; De Petrillo D; Covens A
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Jun; 93(3):588-93. PubMed ID: 15196849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a case control study.
Vizza E; Corrado G; Mancini E; Vici P; Sergi D; Baiocco E; Patrizi L; Saltari M; Pomati G; Cutillo G
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):142-7. PubMed ID: 24063966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Laparoscopic anatomical nerve sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a clinical analysis of 37 cases].
Chen Y; Li Y; Xu HC; Li JN; Li YY; Liang ZQ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 May; 44(5):359-63. PubMed ID: 19573312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.
Choi CH; Lee JW; Lee YY; Kim HJ; Song T; Kim MK; Kim TJ; Kim BG; Bae DS
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Nov; 19(12):3839-48. PubMed ID: 22644508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Impact on survival and quality of life of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy to patients with early-stage cervical cancer].
Yang ZJ; Chen YL; Yao DS; Zhang JQ; Li F; Li L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Nov; 46(11):854-9. PubMed ID: 22333237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy and laparotomy in the treatment of Ib-IIa cervical cancer.
Li G; Yan X; Shang H; Wang G; Chen L; Han Y
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Apr; 105(1):176-80. PubMed ID: 17197013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Nerve-sparing versus conventional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: a minimum 12 months' follow-up study.
Bogani G; Cromi A; Uccella S; Serati M; Casarin J; Pinelli C; Nardelli F; Ghezzi F
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 May; 24(4):787-93. PubMed ID: 24552894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laparoscopic compared with open radical hysterectomy in obese women with early-stage cervical cancer.
Park JY; Kim DY; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT; Nam JH
Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jun; 119(6):1201-9. PubMed ID: 22617585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy for elderly patients with early-stage cervical cancer.
Park JY; Kim DY; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT; Nam JH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 207(3):195.e1-8. PubMed ID: 22939724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy using pulsed bipolar system: comparison with conventional bipolar electrosurgery.
Lee CL; Huang KG; Wang CJ; Lee PS; Hwang LL
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Jun; 105(3):620-4. PubMed ID: 17303226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Retrospective comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer.
Cai J; Yang L; Dong W; Wang H; Xiong Z; Wang Z
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Jan; 132(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 26434669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laparoscopic versus open abdominal management of cervical cancer: long-term results from a propensity-matched analysis.
Bogani G; Cromi A; Uccella S; Serati M; Casarin J; Pinelli C; Ghezzi F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(5):857-62. PubMed ID: 24699300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer: extraperitoneal versus laparoscopic approach.
Larciprete G; Casalino B; Segatore MF; Jarvis S; Catarinella V; Cirese E
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Jun; 126(2):259-63. PubMed ID: 16359771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Matched-Case Comparisons in a Single Institution to Determine Critical Points for Inexperienced Surgeons' Successful Performances of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Stage IA2-IIA Cervical Cancer.
Suh DH; Cho HY; Kim K; No JH; Kim YB
PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0131170. PubMed ID: 26110866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
