137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23948704)
21. Outcome of pancreaticoduodenectomy with extended retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas.
Yang YM; Wan YL; Tian XD; Zhuang Y; Huang YT
Chin Med J (Engl); 2005 Nov; 118(22):1863-9. PubMed ID: 16313840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Oncologic risk in pylorus preservation in resection of ductal pancreas carcinoma].
Gerdes B; Ramaswamy A; Bartsch D; Rothmund M
Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd; 1997; 114():1087-9. PubMed ID: 9574341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of old and new TNM systems for nodal staging in adenocarcinoma of the gastro-oesophageal junction.
de Manzoni G; Pedrazzani C; Verlato G; Roviello F; Pasini F; Pugliese R; Cordiano C
Br J Surg; 2004 Mar; 91(3):296-303. PubMed ID: 14991629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma.
Andersen HB; Baden H; Brahe NE; Burcharth F
J Am Coll Surg; 1994 Nov; 179(5):545-52. PubMed ID: 7952456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Does the extent of lymph node dissection have an effect on morbidity and prognosis after resection of the head of the pancreas for ductal or periampullary pancreatic carcinoma?].
Böttger T; Boddin J; Küchle R; Junginger T
Langenbecks Arch Chir; 1997; 382(4):209-15. PubMed ID: 9445967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Problems in the N-classification of the new 1997 UICC TNM stage classification for gastric cancer: an analysis of over 10 years' outcome of Japanese patients.
Nio Y; Yamasawa K; Yamaguchi K; Itakura M; Omori H; Koike M; Kitamura Y; Tsuji M; Endo S; Ogo Y; Yano S; Sumi S
Anticancer Res; 2003; 23(1B):697-705. PubMed ID: 12680170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The glasgow prognostic score as a predictor of survival in patients with potentially resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
La Torre M; Nigri G; Cavallini M; Mercantini P; Ziparo V; Ramacciato G
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Sep; 19(9):2917-23. PubMed ID: 22488099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Nodal involvement is strongest predictor of poor survival in patients with invasive adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas.
Nakagohri T; Kinoshita T; Konishi M; Takahashi S; Gotohda N
Hepatogastroenterology; 2006; 53(69):447-51. PubMed ID: 16795990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The impact of lymph node number on survival in patients with lymph node-negative pancreatic cancer.
Hellan M; Sun CL; Artinyan A; Mojica-Manosa P; Bhatia S; Ellenhorn JD; Kim J
Pancreas; 2008 Jul; 37(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 18580439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Impact of total retrieved lymph nodes on staging and survival of patients with gastric cancer invading the subserosa.
Liu C; Lu Y; Jun Z; Zhang R; Yao F; Lu P; Jin F; Li H; Xu H; Wang S; Chen J
Surg Oncol; 2009 Dec; 18(4):379-84. PubMed ID: 18954972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Different approaches to assessment of lymph nodes and surgical margin status in patients with ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas treated with pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Liszka Ł; Pajak J; Zielińska-Pajak E; Gołka D; Mrowiec S; Lampe P
Pathology; 2010 Feb; 42(2):138-46. PubMed ID: 20085515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Outcome of extended retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy in the surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas].
Yang YM; Wan YL; Tian XD; Zhuang Y; Huang YT
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2005 Oct; 27(5):568-71. PubMed ID: 16274033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Variations in surgical treatment and outcomes of patients with pancreatic cancer: a population-based study.
Govindarajan A; Tan JC; Baxter NN; Coburn NG; Law CH
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Jan; 15(1):175-85. PubMed ID: 17909913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Relationship between metastatic rate and amount of lymph nodes and prognosis of gastric cancer].
Li K; Xu HM; Chen JQ
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Aug; 85(30):2113-6. PubMed ID: 16313820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Adenocarcinoma of the duodenum: importance of accurate lymph node staging and similarity in outcome to gastric cancer.
Sarela AI; Brennan MF; Karpeh MS; Klimstra D; Conlon KC
Ann Surg Oncol; 2004 Apr; 11(4):380-6. PubMed ID: 15070597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Prognostic implications of netrin-1 expression and its receptors in patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.
Link BC; Reichelt U; Schreiber M; Kaifi JT; Wachowiak R; Bogoevski D; Bubenheim M; Cataldegirmen G; Gawad KA; Issa R; Koops S; Izbicki JR; Yekebas EF
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Sep; 14(9):2591-9. PubMed ID: 17549567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Lymphadenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ): impact of adequate staging on outcome.
Barbour AP; Rizk NP; Gonen M; Tang L; Bains MS; Rusch VW; Coit DG; Brennan MF
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Feb; 14(2):306-16. PubMed ID: 17091329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The number of positive nodes accurately predicts recurrence after pancreaticoduodenectomy for nonfunctioning neuroendocrine neoplasms.
Partelli S; Javed AA; Andreasi V; He J; Muffatti F; Weiss MJ; Sessa F; La Rosa S; Doglioni C; Zamboni G; Wolfgang CL; Falconi M
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2018 Jun; 44(6):778-783. PubMed ID: 29610023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Role of extended lymphadenectomy in the treatment of pancreatic head adenocarcinoma: review and meta-analysis.
Svoronos C; Tsoulfas G; Katsourakis A; Noussios G; Chatzitheoklitos E; Marakis NG
ANZ J Surg; 2014 Oct; 84(10):706-11. PubMed ID: 24165093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Impact of number and site of lymph node invasion on survival of adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction.
Ielpo B; Pernaute AS; Elia S; Buonomo OC; Valladares LD; Aguirre EP; Petrella G; Garcia AT
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2010 May; 10(5):704-8. PubMed ID: 20154347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
