322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23949043)
21. Robotic technologies and rehabilitation: new tools for stroke patients' therapy.
Poli P; Morone G; Rosati G; Masiero S
Biomed Res Int; 2013; 2013():153872. PubMed ID: 24350244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Acceptability of robotic technology in neuro-rehabilitation: preliminary results on chronic stroke patients.
Mazzoleni S; Turchetti G; Palla I; Posteraro F; Dario P
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2014 Sep; 116(2):116-22. PubMed ID: 24461799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Poststroke upper extremity rehabilitation: a review of robotic systems and clinical results.
Brewer BR; McDowell SK; Worthen-Chaudhari LC
Top Stroke Rehabil; 2007; 14(6):22-44. PubMed ID: 18174114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Design and control of RUPERT: a device for robotic upper extremity repetitive therapy.
Sugar TG; He J; Koeneman EJ; Koeneman JB; Herman R; Huang H; Schultz RS; Herring DE; Wanberg J; Balasubramanian S; Swenson P; Ward JA
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2007 Sep; 15(3):336-46. PubMed ID: 17894266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Robotic technology and physical medicine and rehabilitation.
Krebs HI
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2012 Jun; 48(2):319-24. PubMed ID: 22614892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A decision-theoretic approach in the design of an adaptive upper-limb stroke rehabilitation robot.
Huq R; Kan P; Goetschalckx R; Hébert D; Hoey J; Mihailidis A
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975418. PubMed ID: 22275621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effector force requirements to enable robotic systems to provide assisted exercise in people with upper limb impairment after stroke.
Jackson AE; Culmer PR; Levesley MC; Cozens JA; Makower SG; Bhakta BB
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975391. PubMed ID: 22275595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Upper limb robotics applied to neurorehabilitation: An overview of clinical practice.
Duret C; Mazzoleni S
NeuroRehabilitation; 2017; 41(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 28505985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Robotic assistive and rehabilitation devices leading to motor recovery in upper limb: a systematic review.
Khalid S; Alnajjar F; Gochoo M; Renawi A; Shimoda S
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2023 Jul; 18(5):658-672. PubMed ID: 33861684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Robotic therapy: a novel approach in upper-limb neurorehabilitation after stroke.
Masiero S; Carraro E; Celia A; Rosati G; Armani M
Neurol Sci; 2007 Oct; 28(5):294. PubMed ID: 17972048
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. A robotic device as a sensitive quantitative tool to assess upper limb impairments in stroke patients: a preliminary prospective cohort study.
Gilliaux M; Lejeune T; Detrembleur C; Sapin J; Dehez B; Stoquart G
J Rehabil Med; 2012 Mar; 44(3):210-7. PubMed ID: 22367455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Robotic assessment of upper limb motor function after stroke.
Balasubramanian S; Colombo R; Sterpi I; Sanguineti V; Burdet E
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Nov; 91(11 Suppl 3):S255-69. PubMed ID: 23080041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Robotic techniques for upper limb evaluation and rehabilitation of stroke patients.
Colombo R; Pisano F; Micera S; Mazzone A; Delconte C; Carrozza MC; Dario P; Minuco G
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2005 Sep; 13(3):311-24. PubMed ID: 16200755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. EMU: A transparent 3D robotic manipulandum for upper-limb rehabilitation.
Fong J; Crocher V; Tan Y; Oetomo D; Mareels I
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():771-776. PubMed ID: 28813913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. An overview of robotic/mechanical devices for post-stroke thumb rehabilitation.
Suarez-Escobar M; Rendon-Velez E
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2018 Oct; 13(7):683-703. PubMed ID: 29334274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Robotic training and kinematic analysis of arm and hand after incomplete spinal cord injury: a case study.
Kadivar Z; Sullivan JL; Eng DP; Pehlivan AU; O'Malley MK; Yozbatiran N; Francisco GE
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975429. PubMed ID: 22275630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Design & control of a 3D stroke rehabilitation platform.
Cai Z; Tong D; Meadmore KL; Freeman CT; Hughes AM; Rogers E; Burridge JH
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975412. PubMed ID: 22275615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A pilot study of robotic-assisted exercise for hand weakness after stroke.
Stein J; Bishop J; Gillen G; Helbok R
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975426. PubMed ID: 22275627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The development of an upper limb stroke rehabilitation robot: identification of clinical practices and design requirements through a survey of therapists.
Lu EC; Wang RH; Hebert D; Boger J; Galea MP; Mihailidis A
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2011; 6(5):420-31. PubMed ID: 21184626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Including upper extremity robotic therapy during early inpatient stroke rehabilitation may not lead to better outcomes than conventional treatment.
Pang MY
J Physiother; 2014 Sep; 60(3):166. PubMed ID: 25084629
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
