223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23949917)
1. Sonographic findings of pure ductal carcinoma in situ.
Lee MH; Ko EY; Han BK; Shin JH; Ko ES; Hahn SY
J Clin Ultrasound; 2013 Oct; 41(8):465-71. PubMed ID: 23949917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sonographic findings of high-grade and non-high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
Park JS; Park YM; Kim EK; Kim SJ; Han SS; Lee SJ; In HS; Ryu JH
J Ultrasound Med; 2010 Dec; 29(12):1687-97. PubMed ID: 21098839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mammographically non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ: sonographic features with pathological correlation in 35 patients.
Mesurolle B; El-Khoury M; Khetani K; Abdullah N; Joseph L; Kao E
Clin Radiol; 2009 Jun; 64(6):628-36. PubMed ID: 19414087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ultrasonographic detection and characterization of asymptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ with histopathologic correlation.
Gwak YJ; Kim HJ; Kwak JY; Lee SK; Shin KM; Lee HJ; Kim GC; Jang YJ; Han MH; Park JY; Jung JH
Acta Radiol; 2011 May; 52(4):364-71. PubMed ID: 21498298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sensitivity of mammography and ultrasonography on detecting abnormal findings of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Boonjunwetwatmd D; Chyutipraiwan U; Sampatanukul P; Chatamra K
J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 Mar; 90(3):539-45. PubMed ID: 17427533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. US of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Moon WK; Myung JS; Lee YJ; Park IA; Noh DY; Im JG
Radiographics; 2002; 22(2):269-80; discussion 280-1. PubMed ID: 11896217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ultrasound Demonstration of Mammographically Detected Microcalcifications in Patients with Ductal Carcinoma in situ of the Breast.
Nagashima T; Hashimoto H; Oshida K; Nakano S; Tanabe N; Nikaido T; Koda K; Miyazaki M
Breast Cancer; 2005; 12(3):216-20. PubMed ID: 16110292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Role of ultrasound and sonographically guided core biopsy in the diagnostic evaluation of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast.
Londero V; Zuiani C; Furlan A; Nori J; Bazzocchi M
Radiol Med; 2007 Sep; 112(6):863-76. PubMed ID: 17891529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Microcalcifications associated with ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic-pathologic correlation.
Holland R; Hendriks JH
Semin Diagn Pathol; 1994 Aug; 11(3):181-92. PubMed ID: 7831529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Local tumor recurrence following breast-conservation therapy: correlation of histopathologic findings with detection method and mammographic findings.
Giess CS; Keating DM; Osborne MP; Rosenblatt R
Radiology; 1999 Sep; 212(3):829-35. PubMed ID: 10478253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis, digital mammography, and ultrasonography.
Su X; Lin Q; Cui C; Xu W; Wei Z; Fei J; Li L
Breast Cancer; 2017 Jul; 24(4):562-570. PubMed ID: 27837442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sonographic, mammographic, and histopathologic correlation of symptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ.
Yang WT; Tse GM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Jan; 182(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 14684521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sonographic Features of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast With Microinvasion: Correlation With Clinicopathologic Findings and Biomarkers.
Yao JJ; Zhan WW; Chen M; Zhang XX; Zhu Y; Fei XC; Chen XS
J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Oct; 34(10):1761-8. PubMed ID: 26324758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The diagnostic sensitivity of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and breast-specific gamma imaging in women with calcified and non-calcified DCIS.
Kim JS; Lee SM; Cha ES
Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):668-75. PubMed ID: 24043881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiologic findings of lobular carcinoma in situ: mammography and ultrasonography.
Choi BB; Kim SH; Park CS; Cha ES; Lee AW
J Clin Ultrasound; 2011 Feb; 39(2):59-63. PubMed ID: 21213330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Breast US in patients who had microcalcifications with low concern of malignancy on screening mammography.
Kang SS; Ko EY; Han BK; Shin JH
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Aug; 67(2):285-291. PubMed ID: 17703906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sensitivity of breast MRI for ductal carcinoma in situ appearing as microcalcifications only on mammography.
Rinaldi P; Buccheri C; Giuliani M; Bufi E; Romani M; Patrolecco F; Belli P; Bonomo L
Clin Imaging; 2016; 40(6):1207-1212. PubMed ID: 27618803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinicopathologic, mammographic, and sonographic features in 1,187 patients with pure ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast by estrogen receptor status.
Rauch GM; Kuerer HM; Scoggins ME; Fox PS; Benveniste AP; Park YM; Lari SA; Hobbs BP; Adrada BE; Krishnamurthy S; Yang WT
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2013 Jun; 139(3):639-47. PubMed ID: 23774990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. What should be the width of radiological margin to optimize resection of non-palpable invasive or in situ ductal carcinoma?
Ouldamer L; Lechaux E; Arbion F; Body G; Vildé A
Breast; 2014 Dec; 23(6):889-93. PubMed ID: 25456102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sonographic differentiation of invasive and intraductal carcinomas of the breast.
Chen SC; Cheung YC; Lo YF; Chen MF; Hwang TL; Su CH; Hsueh S
Br J Radiol; 2003 Sep; 76(909):600-4. PubMed ID: 14500273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
