222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23949917)
21. Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy of microcalcifications detected at screening mammography.
Cho N; Moon WK; Cha JH; Kim SM; Jang M; Chang JM; Chung SY
Acta Radiol; 2009 Jul; 50(6):602-9. PubMed ID: 19449232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Clinically occult ductal carcinoma in situ detected with mammography: analysis of 100 cases with radiologic-pathologic correlation.
Stomper PC; Connolly JL; Meyer JE; Harris JR
Radiology; 1989 Jul; 172(1):235-41. PubMed ID: 2544922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Screening-detected calcified and non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ: differences in the imaging and histopathological features.
Mun HS; Shin HJ; Kim HH; Cha JH; Kim H
Clin Radiol; 2013 Jan; 68(1):e27-35. PubMed ID: 23177096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Screening-detected and symptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ: differences in the sonographic and pathologic features.
Shin HJ; Kim HH; Kim SM; Kwon GY; Gong G; Cho OK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Feb; 190(2):516-25. PubMed ID: 18212241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Breast US in patients with breast cancer presenting as only microcalcifications on mammography: can US differentiate ductal carcinoma in situ from invasive cancer?
Han JY; Lee JH; Kim EK; Shin S; Kang MJ; Lee KC; Nam KJ
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2014 Jan; 41(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 27277631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Is There Any Association Between Mammographic Features of Microcalcifications and Breast Cancer Subtypes in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ?
Avdan Aslan A; Gültekin S; Esendağli Yilmaz G; Kurukahvecioğlu O
Acad Radiol; 2021 Jul; 28(7):963-968. PubMed ID: 32620528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Long-term Surveillance of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Detected with Screening Mammography versus US: Factors Associated with Second Breast Cancer.
Choi SH; Choi JS; Han BK; Ko EY; Ko ES; Park KW
Radiology; 2019 Jul; 292(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 31038406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Characteristics of ultrasonographic images of ductal carcinoma in situ with abnormalities of the ducts.
Ban K; Tsunoda H; Watanabe T; Kaoku S; Yamaguchi T; Ueno E; Hirokaga K; Tanaka K
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2020 Jan; 47(1):107-115. PubMed ID: 31655940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Histopathological characteristics of breast ductal carcinoma in situ and association with imaging findings.
Tang X; Yamashita T; Hara M; Kumaki N; Tokuda Y; Masuda S
Breast Cancer; 2016 May; 23(3):491-8. PubMed ID: 25644245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Ultrasound Image Classification of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) of the Breast: Analysis of 705 DCIS Lesions.
Watanabe T; Yamaguchi T; Tsunoda H; Kaoku S; Tohno E; Yasuda H; Ban K; Hirokaga K; Tanaka K; Umemoto T; Okuno T; Fujimoto Y; Nakatani S; Ito J; Ueno E
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 May; 43(5):918-925. PubMed ID: 28242086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Correlation between sonographic findings and clinicopathologic and biologic features of pure ductal carcinoma in situ in 691 patients.
Scoggins ME; Fox PS; Kuerer HM; Rauch GM; Benveniste AP; Park YM; Lari SA; Krishnamurthy S; Yang WT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Apr; 204(4):878-88. PubMed ID: 25794082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Sonographic detection and sonographically guided biopsy of breast microcalcifications.
Soo MS; Baker JA; Rosen EL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Apr; 180(4):941-8. PubMed ID: 12646433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Sonographic criteria for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions using real-time spatial compound imaging in combination with XRES adaptive image processing].
Hahn M; Roessner L; Krainick-Strobel U; Gruber IV; Krämer B; Gall C; Siegmann KC; Wallwiener D; Kagan KO
Ultraschall Med; 2012 Jun; 33(3):270-4. PubMed ID: 20614412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Sonographically guided biopsy of suspicious microcalcifications of the breast: a pilot study.
Soo MS; Baker JA; Rosen EL; Vo TT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Apr; 178(4):1007-15. PubMed ID: 11906892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Mammographic extent of microcalcifications and oestrogen receptor expression affect preoperative breast carcinoma in situ size estimation.
Vernet-Tomas M; Mojal S; Gamero R; Nicolau P; Rodríguez-Arana A; Plancarte F; Corominas JM; Serrano-Munne L; Carreras R; Sabadell D
Breast Cancer; 2017 May; 24(3):466-472. PubMed ID: 27639877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Imaging and pathologic features of non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ: can sonography predict upgrade?
Komarla R; Gilliland L; Piraner M; Seidel R; Clifford K; Kunjummen J
Br J Radiol; 2022 Feb; 95(1130):20211013. PubMed ID: 34870448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Impact of digital mammography in the detection and management of microcalcifications].
Mellado M; Osa AM; Murillo A; Bermejo R; Burguete A; Pons MJ; Erdozain N
Radiologia; 2013; 55(2):142-7. PubMed ID: 22015223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A Case Series of Malign Hyperechoic Breast Lesions.
Yilmaz TF; Sari L; Temur HO; Toprak H; Yildiz Ş
Curr Med Imaging; 2020; 16(6):766-773. PubMed ID: 32723248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Can Occult Invasive Disease in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Be Predicted Using Computer-extracted Mammographic Features?
Shi B; Grimm LJ; Mazurowski MA; Baker JA; Marks JR; King LM; Maley CC; Hwang ES; Lo JY
Acad Radiol; 2017 Sep; 24(9):1139-1147. PubMed ID: 28506510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Sonographic evaluation of mammographically detected microcalcifications without a mass prior to stereotactic core needle biopsy.
Cheung YC; Wan YL; Chen SC; Lui KW; Ng SH; Yeow KM; Lee KF; Hsueh S
J Clin Ultrasound; 2002; 30(6):323-31. PubMed ID: 12116093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
