BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

341 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23950497)

  • 1. Dynamically reshaping signaling networks to program cell fate via genetic controllers.
    Galloway KE; Franco E; Smolke CD
    Science; 2013 Sep; 341(6152):1235005. PubMed ID: 23950497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cell signaling. Concentrating (on) native proteins to control cell fate.
    Sarkar CA
    Science; 2013 Sep; 341(6152):1349-51. PubMed ID: 24052296
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Synthetic biology: Engineering off the beaten pathway.
    Nawy T
    Nat Methods; 2013 Oct; 10(10):938. PubMed ID: 24161984
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A fungicide-responsive kinase as a tool for synthetic cell fate regulation.
    Furukawa K; Hohmann S
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2015 Aug; 43(14):7162-70. PubMed ID: 26138483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) dynamics determine cell fate in the yeast mating response.
    Li Y; Roberts J; AkhavanAghdam Z; Hao N
    J Biol Chem; 2017 Dec; 292(50):20354-20361. PubMed ID: 29123025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modular and tunable biological feedback control using a de novo protein switch.
    Ng AH; Nguyen TH; Gómez-Schiavon M; Dods G; Langan RA; Boyken SE; Samson JA; Waldburger LM; Dueber JE; Baker D; El-Samad H
    Nature; 2019 Aug; 572(7768):265-269. PubMed ID: 31341280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Molecular Buffers Permit Sensitivity Tuning and Inversion of Riboswitch Signals.
    Rugbjerg P; Genee HJ; Jensen K; Sarup-Lytzen K; Sommer MO
    ACS Synth Biol; 2016 Jul; 5(7):632-8. PubMed ID: 27138234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Synthetic mixed-signal computation in living cells.
    Rubens JR; Selvaggio G; Lu TK
    Nat Commun; 2016 Jun; 7():11658. PubMed ID: 27255669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Customizing cell signaling using engineered genetic logic circuits.
    Wang B; Buck M
    Trends Microbiol; 2012 Aug; 20(8):376-84. PubMed ID: 22682075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A guide to the design of synthetic gene networks in mammalian cells.
    Verbič A; Praznik A; Jerala R
    FEBS J; 2021 Sep; 288(18):5265-5288. PubMed ID: 33289352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Plug-and-Play Multicellular Circuits with Time-Dependent Dynamic Responses.
    Urrios A; Gonzalez-Flo E; Canadell D; de Nadal E; Macia J; Posas F
    ACS Synth Biol; 2018 Apr; 7(4):1095-1104. PubMed ID: 29584406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Engineering dynamical control of cell fate switching using synthetic phospho-regulons.
    Gordley RM; Williams RE; Bashor CJ; Toettcher JE; Yan S; Lim WA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Nov; 113(47):13528-13533. PubMed ID: 27821768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Designing cell function: assembly of synthetic gene circuits for cell biology applications.
    Xie M; Fussenegger M
    Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol; 2018 Aug; 19(8):507-525. PubMed ID: 29858606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Integrating phosphorylation network with transcriptional network reveals novel functional relationships.
    Wang L; Hou L; Qian M; Deng M
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(3):e33160. PubMed ID: 22432002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Linearizer gene circuits with negative feedback regulation.
    Nevozhay D; Adams RM; Balázsi G
    Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 734():81-100. PubMed ID: 21468986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A synthetic gene circuit for measuring autoregulatory feedback control.
    Schikora-Tamarit MÀ; Toscano-Ochoa C; Domingo Espinós J; Espinar L; Carey LB
    Integr Biol (Camb); 2016 Apr; 8(4):546-55. PubMed ID: 26728081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ste11p MEKK signals through HOG, mating, calcineurin and PKC pathways to regulate the FKS2 gene.
    Wang X; Sheff MA; Simpson DM; Elion EA
    BMC Mol Biol; 2011 Nov; 12():51. PubMed ID: 22114773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Noise and interlocking signaling pathways promote distinct transcription factor dynamics in response to different stresses.
    Petrenko N; Chereji RV; McClean MN; Morozov AV; Broach JR
    Mol Biol Cell; 2013 Jun; 24(12):2045-57. PubMed ID: 23615444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genetic interaction profiles of regulatory kinases differ between environmental conditions and cellular states.
    Sun S; Baryshnikova A; Brandt N; Gresham D
    Mol Syst Biol; 2020 May; 16(5):e9167. PubMed ID: 32449603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Foundations for the design and implementation of synthetic genetic circuits.
    Slusarczyk AL; Lin A; Weiss R
    Nat Rev Genet; 2012 May; 13(6):406-20. PubMed ID: 22596318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.