These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23950646)

  • 1. Shared decision making in psychiatric practice and the primary care setting is unique, as measured using a 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9).
    De Las Cuevas C; Peñate W; Perestelo-Pérez L; Serrano-Aguilar P
    Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat; 2013; 9():1045-52. PubMed ID: 23950646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validity and reliability of the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) in a national survey in Hungary.
    Rencz F; Tamási B; Brodszky V; Gulácsi L; Weszl M; Péntek M
    Eur J Health Econ; 2019 Jun; 20(Suppl 1):43-55. PubMed ID: 31111402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. To what extent psychiatric patients feel involved in decision making about their mental health care? Relationships with socio-demographic, clinical, and psychological variables.
    De las Cuevas C; Peñate W
    Acta Neuropsychiatr; 2014 Dec; 26(6):372-81. PubMed ID: 25288200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Psychometric properties of the SDM-Q-9 questionnaire for shared decision-making in multiple sclerosis: item response theory modelling and confirmatory factor analysis.
    Ballesteros J; Moral E; Brieva L; Ruiz-Beato E; Prefasi D; Maurino J
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 Apr; 15(1):79. PubMed ID: 28431587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Psychometric Evaluation of the Japanese 9-Item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire and Its Association with Decision Conflict and Patient Factors in Japanese Primary Care.
    Goto Y; Miura H; Son D; Arai H; Kriston L; Scholl I; Härter M; Sato K; Kusaba T
    JMA J; 2020 Jul; 3(3):208-215. PubMed ID: 33150255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Patients' perspective on shared decision-making in urology: a prospective study at a university hospital.
    Grüne B; Köther AK; Büdenbender B; Michel MS; Kriegmair MC; Alpers GW
    World J Urol; 2021 Dec; 39(12):4491-4498. PubMed ID: 34338818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dutch Translation and Psychometric Testing of the 9-Item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) and Shared Decision Making Questionnaire-Physician Version (SDM-Q-Doc) in Primary and Secondary Care.
    Rodenburg-Vandenbussche S; Pieterse AH; Kroonenberg PM; Scholl I; van der Weijden T; Luyten GP; Kruitwagen RF; den Ouden H; Carlier IV; van Vliet IM; Zitman FG; Stiggelbout AM
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0132158. PubMed ID: 26151946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Psychometric Properties of the 9-Item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9): Validation of the Italian Version in a Large Psychiatric Clinical Sample.
    de Filippis R; Aloi M; Pilieci AM; Boniello F; Quirino D; Steardo L; Segura-Garcia C; De Fazio P
    Clin Neuropsychiatry; 2022 Aug; 19(4):264-271. PubMed ID: 36101644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Characteristics of shared decision making in Romania from the patient perspective: A cross-sectional multicentric study.
    Baicus C; Balanescu P; Zeh S; Oprisan E; Lapadatu R; Gurghean A; Padureanu V; Rezus C; Mitu F; Jurcut R; Balanescu AR; Daha I; Balanescu E; Bojinca M; Pinte L; Constantin AM; Dima N; Floria M; Leon-Constantin MM; Roca M; Mitu M; Chiriac S; Badescu CM; Ionescu SD; Mitrea E; Rosu G; Rezus E; Ionescu GD; Visinescu AM; Mihailescu G; Badea CG
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2019 Dec; 25(6):1152-1159. PubMed ID: 31407420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing the nine-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire to the OPTION Scale - an attempt to establish convergent validity.
    Scholl I; Kriston L; Dirmaier J; Härter M
    Health Expect; 2015 Feb; 18(1):137-50. PubMed ID: 23176071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating the Impact of a Training Program in Shared Decision-Making for Neurologists Treating People with Migraine.
    Porta-Etessam J; Santos-Lasaosa S; Rodríguez-Vico J; Núñez M; Ciudad A; Díaz-Cerezo S; Comellas M; Pérez-Sádaba FJ; Lizán L; Guerrero-Peral AL
    Neurol Ther; 2023 Aug; 12(4):1319-1334. PubMed ID: 37310593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patients' and clinicians' perspectives on shared decision-making regarding treatment decisions for depression, anxiety disorders, and obsessive-compulsive disorder in specialized psychiatric care.
    Rodenburg-Vandenbussche S; Carlier I; van Vliet I; van Hemert A; Stiggelbout A; Zitman F
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2020 Apr; 26(2):645-658. PubMed ID: 31612578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A skills network approach to physicians' competence in shared decision making.
    Kriston L; Hahlweg P; Härter M; Scholl I
    Health Expect; 2020 Dec; 23(6):1466-1476. PubMed ID: 32869476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development and psychometric properties of the Shared Decision Making Questionnaire--physician version (SDM-Q-Doc).
    Scholl I; Kriston L; Dirmaier J; Buchholz A; Härter M
    Patient Educ Couns; 2012 Aug; 88(2):284-90. PubMed ID: 22480628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9 and SDM-Q-Doc) in intervention studies-A systematic review.
    Doherr H; Christalle E; Kriston L; Härter M; Scholl I
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0173904. PubMed ID: 28358864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Testing psychometric properties of Shared Decision Making Questionnaire - Physician Version (SDM-Q-Doc) in an Italian real-world psychiatric clinical sample.
    De Filippis R; Aloi M; Reina S; Cantavenara A; Steardo L; De Fazio P; Segura-Garcia C
    Riv Psichiatr; 2023; 58(4):167-174. PubMed ID: 37409434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conceptual understanding and applicability of shared decision-making in psychiatric care: An integrative review.
    Gurtner C; Schols JMGA; Lohrmann C; Halfens RJG; Hahn S
    J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 2021 Aug; 28(4):531-548. PubMed ID: 33191536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Association between physicians' and patients' perspectives of shared decision making in primary care settings in Japan: The impact of environmental factors.
    Goto Y; Miura H; Son D; Scholl I; Kriston L; Härter M; Sato K; Kusaba T; Arai H
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0246518. PubMed ID: 33566830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validating patient and physician versions of the shared decision making questionnaire in oncology setting.
    Nejati B; Lin CC; Imani V; Browall M; Lin CY; Broström A; Pakpour AH
    Health Promot Perspect; 2019; 9(2):105-114. PubMed ID: 31249797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The psychometric properties of CollaboRATE: a fast and frugal patient-reported measure of the shared decision-making process.
    Barr PJ; Thompson R; Walsh T; Grande SW; Ozanne EM; Elwyn G
    J Med Internet Res; 2014 Jan; 16(1):e2. PubMed ID: 24389354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.