These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Evaluation of the Hemostatic Efficacy of Two Powdered Topical Absorbable Hemostats Using a Porcine Liver Abrasion Model of Mild to Moderate Bleeding. MacDonald MH; Tasse L; Wang D; Zhang G; De Leon H; Kocharian R J Invest Surg; 2021 Nov; 34(11):1198-1206. PubMed ID: 32928005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An in vivo comparison of the efficacy of hemostatic powders, using two porcine bleeding models. MacDonald MH; Wang AY; Clymer JW; Hutchinson RW; Kocharian R Med Devices (Auckl); 2017; 10():273-279. PubMed ID: 29238233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Oxidized (non)-regenerated cellulose affects fundamental cellular processes of wound healing. Wagenhäuser MU; Mulorz J; Ibing W; Simon F; Spin JM; Schelzig H; Oberhuber A Sci Rep; 2016 Aug; 6():32238. PubMed ID: 27557881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computed Tomographic Characterization of Traumastem-A New Oxidized Cellulose Hemostatic Agent. Lewis PB; Wilson ST; Kentala DR; Barry J; Lewis KM Tomography; 2016 Sep; 2(3):175-178. PubMed ID: 30042962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Non-Regenerated and Regenerated Oxidized Cellulose Based Fibrous Haemostats. Habal P; Sívková V; Votava P Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove); 2022; 65(2):53-58. PubMed ID: 36458932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy of regenerated and non-regenerated oxidized cellulose gauze for the secondary treatment of local bleeding in patients undergoing hepatic resection. Zhang C; Fu D; Wang F; Zhong X; Yang L; Wu G; Li B; Zhang J Ann Surg Treat Res; 2021 Apr; 100(4):193-199. PubMed ID: 33854988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Time-dependent effects of cellulose and gelatin-based hemostats on cellular processes of wound healing. Wagenhäuser MU; Garabet W; van Bonn M; Ibing W; Mulorz J; Rhee YH; Spin JM; Dimopoulos C; Oberhuber A; Schelzig H; Simon F Arch Med Sci; 2023; 19(1):194-202. PubMed ID: 36817681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Absorbable Hemostatic Aggregates. Wang AY; Rafalko J; MacDonald M; Ming X; Kocharian R ACS Biomater Sci Eng; 2017 Dec; 3(12):3675-3686. PubMed ID: 33445402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hemostatic effect of oxidized regenerated cellulose in an experimental gastric mucosal resection model. Velázquez-Aviña J; Mönkemüller K; Sakai P; Sulbaran M; Chávez-Vargas C; Montalvo Javé E; Sobrino-Cossío S Endoscopy; 2014 Oct; 46(10):878-82. PubMed ID: 25225961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hemostatic efficacy of EVARREST™, Fibrin Sealant Patch vs. TachoSil® in a heparinized swine spleen incision model. Matonick JP; Hammond J J Invest Surg; 2014 Dec; 27(6):360-5. PubMed ID: 25361019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of oxidized regenerated cellulose to achieve hemostasis during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective cohort analysis. Masci E; Faillace G; Longoni M BMC Res Notes; 2018 Apr; 11(1):239. PubMed ID: 29642951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro antimicrobial activity of oxidized regenerated cellulose against antibiotic-resistant microorganisms. Spangler D; Rothenburger S; Nguyen K; Jampani H; Weiss S; Bhende S Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2003; 4(3):255-62. PubMed ID: 14588160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cytotoxicity, bactericidal and hemostatic evaluation of oxidized cellulose microparticles: Structure and oxidation degree approach. Aydemir Sezer U; Sahin İ; Aru B; Olmez H; Yanıkkaya Demirel G; Sezer S Carbohydr Polym; 2019 Sep; 219():87-94. PubMed ID: 31151549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the efficacy of five standard topical hemostats: a study in porcine liver and spleen models of surgical bleeding. Paternò VA; Bisin A; Addis A BMC Surg; 2020 Sep; 20(1):215. PubMed ID: 32977788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Hemostatic effects of oxidized cellulose]. Kollár P; Suchý P; Muselík J; Bajerová M; Havelka P; Sopuch T Ceska Slov Farm; 2008 Jan; 57(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 18383918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fibrin Sealant Patch (TachoSil) vs Oxidized Regenerated Cellulose Patch (Surgicel Original) for the Secondary Treatment of Local Bleeding in Patients Undergoing Hepatic Resection: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Genyk Y; Kato T; Pomposelli JJ; Wright JK; Sher LS; Tetens V; Chapman WC J Am Coll Surg; 2016 Mar; 222(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 26776356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effectiveness of Hemopatch® versus Surgicel® Original to control mild and moderate liver bleeding. Uranues S; Fingerhut A; Levin E; Spazierer D; Rahimi N; Baumgartner B BMC Surg; 2022 Aug; 22(1):316. PubMed ID: 35965336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]