These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23951272)

  • 1. Direct reciprocity in spatial populations enhances R-reciprocity as well as ST-reciprocity.
    Miyaji K; Tanimoto J; Wang Z; Hagishima A; Ikegaya N
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(8):e71961. PubMed ID: 23951272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A study on emergence of alternating reciprocity in a 2 x 2 game with 2-length memory strategy.
    Tanimoto J; Sagara H
    Biosystems; 2007; 90(3):728-37. PubMed ID: 17418483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transforming the dilemma.
    Taylor C; Nowak MA
    Evolution; 2007 Oct; 61(10):2281-92. PubMed ID: 17711471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Chaos, oscillation and the evolution of indirect reciprocity in n-person games.
    Suzuki S; Akiyama E
    J Theor Biol; 2008 Jun; 252(4):686-93. PubMed ID: 18371983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Environment-based preference selection promotes cooperation in spatial prisoner's dilemma game.
    Wu Y; Zhang S; Zhang Z
    Sci Rep; 2018 Oct; 8(1):15616. PubMed ID: 30353150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Collapse of cooperation in evolving games.
    Stewart AJ; Plotkin JB
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Dec; 111(49):17558-63. PubMed ID: 25422421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The extended reciprocity: Strong belief outperforms persistence.
    Kurokawa S
    J Theor Biol; 2017 May; 421():16-27. PubMed ID: 28347728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reciprocity phase in various 2×2 games by agents equipped with two-memory length strategy encouraged by grouping for interaction and adaptation.
    Wakiyama M; Tanimoto J
    Biosystems; 2011 Jan; 103(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 21035518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Direct reciprocity and model-predictive rationality explain network reciprocity over social ties.
    Dercole F; Della Rossa F; Piccardi C
    Sci Rep; 2019 Apr; 9(1):5367. PubMed ID: 30931975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sequential interactions-in which one player plays first and another responds-promote cooperation in evolutionary-dynamical simulations of single-shot Prisoner's Dilemma and Snowdrift games.
    Laird RA
    J Theor Biol; 2018 Sep; 452():69-80. PubMed ID: 29763610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Memory boosts turn taking in evolutionary dilemma games.
    Wang T; Chen Z; Yang L; Zou Y; Luo J
    Biosystems; 2015 May; 131():30-9. PubMed ID: 25841617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A simple rule of direct reciprocity leads to the stable coexistence of cooperation and defection in the Prisoner's Dilemma game.
    Zheng XD; Li C; Yu JR; Wang SC; Fan SJ; Zhang BY; Tao Y
    J Theor Biol; 2017 May; 420():12-17. PubMed ID: 28259660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evolution of reciprocity with limited payoff memory.
    Glynatsi NE; McAvoy A; Hilbe C
    Proc Biol Sci; 2024 Jun; 291(2025):20232493. PubMed ID: 38889792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An analysis of network reciprocity in Prisoner's Dilemma games using Full Factorial Designs of Experiment.
    Yamauchi A; Tanimoto J; Hagishima A
    Biosystems; 2011 Jan; 103(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 20955762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evolution of coordinated alternating reciprocity in repeated dyadic games.
    Browning L; Colman AM
    J Theor Biol; 2004 Aug; 229(4):549-57. PubMed ID: 15246790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Memory and target payoff enhance cooperation in evolutionary social dilemmas.
    Lin X; Li J; Fan S
    Chaos; 2024 Aug; 34(8):. PubMed ID: 39088347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The evolution of cooperation on correlated payoff landscapes.
    Brede M
    Artif Life; 2011; 17(4):365-73. PubMed ID: 21762024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Direct reciprocity with costly punishment: generous tit-for-tat prevails.
    Rand DG; Ohtsuki H; Nowak MA
    J Theor Biol; 2009 Jan; 256(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 18938180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What controls network reciprocity in the Prisoner's Dilemma game?
    Yamauchi A; Tanimoto J; Hagishima A
    Biosystems; 2010; 102(2-3):82-7. PubMed ID: 20696209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Discounting and reciprocity in an Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma.
    Stephens DW; McLinn CM; Stevens JR
    Science; 2002 Dec; 298(5601):2216-8. PubMed ID: 12481142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.