324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23951272)
1. Direct reciprocity in spatial populations enhances R-reciprocity as well as ST-reciprocity.
Miyaji K; Tanimoto J; Wang Z; Hagishima A; Ikegaya N
PLoS One; 2013; 8(8):e71961. PubMed ID: 23951272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A study on emergence of alternating reciprocity in a 2 x 2 game with 2-length memory strategy.
Tanimoto J; Sagara H
Biosystems; 2007; 90(3):728-37. PubMed ID: 17418483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transforming the dilemma.
Taylor C; Nowak MA
Evolution; 2007 Oct; 61(10):2281-92. PubMed ID: 17711471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Chaos, oscillation and the evolution of indirect reciprocity in n-person games.
Suzuki S; Akiyama E
J Theor Biol; 2008 Jun; 252(4):686-93. PubMed ID: 18371983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Environment-based preference selection promotes cooperation in spatial prisoner's dilemma game.
Wu Y; Zhang S; Zhang Z
Sci Rep; 2018 Oct; 8(1):15616. PubMed ID: 30353150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Collapse of cooperation in evolving games.
Stewart AJ; Plotkin JB
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Dec; 111(49):17558-63. PubMed ID: 25422421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The extended reciprocity: Strong belief outperforms persistence.
Kurokawa S
J Theor Biol; 2017 May; 421():16-27. PubMed ID: 28347728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reciprocity phase in various 2×2 games by agents equipped with two-memory length strategy encouraged by grouping for interaction and adaptation.
Wakiyama M; Tanimoto J
Biosystems; 2011 Jan; 103(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 21035518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Direct reciprocity and model-predictive rationality explain network reciprocity over social ties.
Dercole F; Della Rossa F; Piccardi C
Sci Rep; 2019 Apr; 9(1):5367. PubMed ID: 30931975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sequential interactions-in which one player plays first and another responds-promote cooperation in evolutionary-dynamical simulations of single-shot Prisoner's Dilemma and Snowdrift games.
Laird RA
J Theor Biol; 2018 Sep; 452():69-80. PubMed ID: 29763610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Memory boosts turn taking in evolutionary dilemma games.
Wang T; Chen Z; Yang L; Zou Y; Luo J
Biosystems; 2015 May; 131():30-9. PubMed ID: 25841617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A simple rule of direct reciprocity leads to the stable coexistence of cooperation and defection in the Prisoner's Dilemma game.
Zheng XD; Li C; Yu JR; Wang SC; Fan SJ; Zhang BY; Tao Y
J Theor Biol; 2017 May; 420():12-17. PubMed ID: 28259660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evolution of reciprocity with limited payoff memory.
Glynatsi NE; McAvoy A; Hilbe C
Proc Biol Sci; 2024 Jun; 291(2025):20232493. PubMed ID: 38889792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An analysis of network reciprocity in Prisoner's Dilemma games using Full Factorial Designs of Experiment.
Yamauchi A; Tanimoto J; Hagishima A
Biosystems; 2011 Jan; 103(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 20955762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evolution of coordinated alternating reciprocity in repeated dyadic games.
Browning L; Colman AM
J Theor Biol; 2004 Aug; 229(4):549-57. PubMed ID: 15246790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The evolution of cooperation on correlated payoff landscapes.
Brede M
Artif Life; 2011; 17(4):365-73. PubMed ID: 21762024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Direct reciprocity with costly punishment: generous tit-for-tat prevails.
Rand DG; Ohtsuki H; Nowak MA
J Theor Biol; 2009 Jan; 256(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 18938180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. What controls network reciprocity in the Prisoner's Dilemma game?
Yamauchi A; Tanimoto J; Hagishima A
Biosystems; 2010; 102(2-3):82-7. PubMed ID: 20696209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Discounting and reciprocity in an Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma.
Stephens DW; McLinn CM; Stevens JR
Science; 2002 Dec; 298(5601):2216-8. PubMed ID: 12481142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A simple scaling of the effectiveness of supporting mutual cooperation in donor-recipient games by various reciprocity mechanisms.
Tanimoto J
Biosystems; 2009 Apr; 96(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 19059458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
