152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23951342)
1. The effect of $1, $5 and $10 stakes in an online dictator game.
Raihani NJ; Mace R; Lamba S
PLoS One; 2013; 8(8):e73131. PubMed ID: 23951342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How much is our fairness worth? The effect of raising stakes on offers by Proposers and minimum acceptable offers in Dictator and Ultimatum Games.
Novakova J; Flegr J
PLoS One; 2013; 8(4):e60966. PubMed ID: 23580080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Using crowdsourced online experiments to study context-dependency of behavior.
Keuschnigg M; Bader F; Bracher J
Soc Sci Res; 2016 Sep; 59():68-82. PubMed ID: 27480372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Exploring the effects of working for endowments on behaviour in standard economic games.
Harrison F; El Mouden C
PLoS One; 2011; 6(11):e27623. PubMed ID: 22110696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A positive effect of flowers rather than eye images in a large-scale, cross-cultural dictator game.
Raihani NJ; Bshary R
Proc Biol Sci; 2012 Sep; 279(1742):3556-64. PubMed ID: 22673357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Economic games on the internet: the effect of $1 stakes.
Amir O; Rand DG; Gal YK
PLoS One; 2012; 7(2):e31461. PubMed ID: 22363651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Between Joy and Sympathy: Smiling and Sad Recipient Faces Increase Prosocial Behavior in the Dictator Game.
Weiß M; Hein G; Hewig J
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jun; 18(11):. PubMed ID: 34200370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Proportion offered in the Dictator and Ultimatum Games decreases with amount and social distance.
Bechler C; Green L; Myerson J
Behav Processes; 2015 Jun; 115():149-55. PubMed ID: 25862989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Variation in cooperative behaviour within a single city.
Nettle D; Colléony A; Cockerill M
PLoS One; 2011; 6(10):e26922. PubMed ID: 22046411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of delay and social distance in the dictator and ultimatum games.
Osiński J; Karbowski A; Rusek J; Reinholz A
Behav Processes; 2021 Dec; 193():104513. PubMed ID: 34582937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of amount and tangibility of endowment and certainty of recipients on selfishness in a modified dictator game.
Chang SC; Lin LY; Horng RY; Wang YD
Psychol Rep; 2014 Jun; 114(3):720-39. PubMed ID: 25074299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Willingness to be the recipient during the dictator game.
Hashimoto H; Maeda K; Yamamoto K; Mifune N
BMC Res Notes; 2022 Jul; 15(1):261. PubMed ID: 35870936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rational Dictators in the Dictator Game Are Seen as Cold and Agentic but Not Intelligent.
Ruessmann JK; Unkelbach C
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2022 Aug; 48(8):1298-1312. PubMed ID: 34459314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Individual differences in allocation of funds in the dictator game associated with length of the arginine vasopressin 1a receptor RS3 promoter region and correlation between RS3 length and hippocampal mRNA.
Knafo A; Israel S; Darvasi A; Bachner-Melman R; Uzefovsky F; Cohen L; Feldman E; Lerer E; Laiba E; Raz Y; Nemanov L; Gritsenko I; Dina C; Agam G; Dean B; Bornstein G; Ebstein RP
Genes Brain Behav; 2008 Apr; 7(3):266-75. PubMed ID: 17696996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of anchors and social information on behaviour.
O'Garra T; Sisco MR
PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0231203. PubMed ID: 32287302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A neural signature of fairness in altruism: a game of theta?
Rodrigues J; Ulrich N; Hewig J
Soc Neurosci; 2015 Apr; 10(2):192-205. PubMed ID: 25350461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Humans expect generosity.
Brañas-Garza P; Rodríguez-Lara I; Sánchez A
Sci Rep; 2017 Feb; 7():42446. PubMed ID: 28195218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of biases in numerical magnitude allocation on human prosocial decision making.
Arshad Q; Nigmatullina Y; Siddiqui S; Franka M; Mediratta S; Ramachandaran S; Lobo R; Malhotra PA; Roberts RE; Bronstein AM
J Neurophysiol; 2017 Dec; 118(6):3007-3013. PubMed ID: 28904100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Moral Bargain Hunters Purchase Moral Righteousness When it is Cheap: Within-Individual Effect of Stake Size in Economic Games.
Yamagishi T; Li Y; Matsumoto Y; Kiyonari T
Sci Rep; 2016 Jun; 6():27824. PubMed ID: 27296466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Social evaluation-induced amylase elevation and economic decision-making in the dictator game in humans.
Takahashi T; Ikeda K; Hasegawa T
Neuro Endocrinol Lett; 2007 Oct; 28(5):662-5. PubMed ID: 17984929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
