These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23951787)

  • 1. Failure rate of high-viscosity GIC based ART compared with that of conventional amalgam restorations--evidence from an update of a systematic review.
    Mickenautsch S; Yengopal V
    SADJ; 2012 Aug; 67(7):329-31. PubMed ID: 23951787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High-viscosity glass-ionomer cements for direct posterior tooth restorations in permanent teeth: The evidence in brief.
    Mickenautsch S
    J Dent; 2016 Dec; 55():121-123. PubMed ID: 27765512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does low-cost GIC have the same survival rate as high-viscosity GIC in atraumatic restorative treatments? A RCT.
    Moura MS; Sousa GP; Brito MHSF; Silva MCC; Lima MDM; Moura LFAD; Lima CCB
    Braz Oral Res; 2020; 33():e125. PubMed ID: 31994598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of ART and conventional techniques on clinical performance of glass-ionomer cement restorations in load bearing areas of permanent and primary dentitions: A systematic review.
    Ruengrungsom C; Palamara JEA; Burrow MF
    J Dent; 2018 Nov; 78():1-21. PubMed ID: 30017937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Replacing amalgam with a high-viscosity glass-ionomer in restoring primary teeth: A cost-effectiveness study in Brasilia, Brazil.
    Goldman A; Frencken JE; De Amorim RG; Leal SC
    J Dent; 2018 Mar; 70():80-86. PubMed ID: 29289729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Six-year success rates of occlusal amalgam and glass-ionomer restorations placed using three minimal intervention approaches.
    Mandari GJ; Frencken JE; van't Hof MA
    Caries Res; 2003; 37(4):246-53. PubMed ID: 12771499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Amalgam and ART restorations in children: a controlled clinical trial.
    de Amorim RG; Leal SC; Mulder J; Creugers NH; Frencken JE
    Clin Oral Investig; 2014 Jan; 18(1):117-24. PubMed ID: 23455576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is high-viscosity glass-ionomer-cement a successor to amalgam for treating primary molars?
    Hilgert LA; de Amorim RG; Leal SC; Mulder J; Creugers NH; Frencken JE
    Dent Mater; 2014 Oct; 30(10):1172-8. PubMed ID: 25132283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of two tooth-saving preparation techniques for one-surface cavities.
    Rahimtoola S; van Amerongen E
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2002; 69(1):16-26, 11. PubMed ID: 12119808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results.
    Yip HK; Smales RJ; Yu C; Gao XJ; Deng DM
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Jan; 33(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 11887531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Absence of carious lesions at margins of glass-ionomer and amalgam restorations: a meta- analysis.
    Mickenautsch S; Yengopal V; Leal SC; Oliveira LB; Bezerra AC; Bönecker M
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2009 Mar; 10(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 19364244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months.
    Gao W; Peng D; Smales RJ; Yip KH
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 12674356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART): a three-year clinical study in Malawi--comparison of conventional amalgam and ART restorations.
    Kalf-Scholte SM; van Amerongen WE; Smith AJ; van Haastrecht HJ
    J Public Health Dent; 2003; 63(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 12816140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Survival of glass ionomer restorations placed in primary molars using atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) and conventional cavity preparations: 2-year results.
    Yu C; Gao XJ; Deng DM; Yip HK; Smales RJ
    Int Dent J; 2004 Feb; 54(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 15005472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Randomized clinical trial of encapsulated and hand-mixed glass-ionomer ART restorations: one-year follow-up.
    Freitas MCCA; Fagundes TC; Modena KCDS; Cardia GS; Navarro MFL
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2018 Jan; 26():e20170129. PubMed ID: 29364343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Glass carbomer and compomer for ART restorations: 3-year results of a randomized clinical trial.
    Olegário IC; Hesse D; Mendes FM; Bonifácio CC; Raggio DP
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Apr; 23(4):1761-1770. PubMed ID: 30171345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Survival of ART and amalgam restorations in permanent teeth of children after 6.3 years.
    Frencken JE; Taifour D; van 't Hof MA
    J Dent Res; 2006 Jul; 85(7):622-6. PubMed ID: 16798862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of manual restorative treatment (MRT) with amalgam in high-caries Filipino children: results after 2 years.
    Monse-Schneider B; Heinrich-Weltzien R; Schug D; Sheiham A; Borutta A
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2003 Apr; 31(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 12641594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious primary teeth without pulp therapy: a systematic review.
    Amend S; Boutsiouki C; Bekes K; Kloukos D; Lygidakis NN; Frankenberger R; Krämer N
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2022 Oct; 23(5):727-759. PubMed ID: 35819627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.