These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23951800)

  • 1. The role of the nose and cranial base in profile assessment: a morphological comparison between native African and Caucasian samples.
    Dandajena T; Chung KW
    SADJ; 2012 Aug; 67(7):394-9. PubMed ID: 23951800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Soft-tissue cephalometric norms for the Lambada population in Telangana Region of Andhra Pradesh.
    Thomas M; Reddy VD; Lakshmi HV
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):353-8. PubMed ID: 23059572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Soft tissue morphology of Jordanian adolescents.
    Hamdan AM
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Jan; 80(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 19852644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A cephalometric investigation of horizontal lip position in adult Nigerians.
    Ikenna Isiekwe G; Olatokunbo DaCosta O; Chukwudi Isiekwe M
    J Orthod; 2012 Sep; 39(3):160-9. PubMed ID: 22984100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Growth changes in the soft tissue facial profile.
    Nanda RS; Meng H; Kapila S; Goorhuis J
    Angle Orthod; 1990; 60(3):177-90. PubMed ID: 2389850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A 3D analysis of Caucasian and African American facial morphologies in a US population.
    Talbert L; Kau CH; Christou T; Vlachos C; Souccar N
    J Orthod; 2014 Mar; 41(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 24671286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of craniofacial characteristics of typical Chinese and Caucasian young adults.
    Gu Y; McNamara JA; Sigler LM; Baccetti T
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Apr; 33(2):205-11. PubMed ID: 20709723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Sagittal photogrammetric evaluation of the soft tissue profile between two different racial groups: a comparative study].
    Diouf JS; Ngom PI; Fadiga MS; Badiane A; Diop-Ba K; Ndiaye M; Diagne F
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2015 Jun; 38(150):5-14. PubMed ID: 26934767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changes in facial profile of young adults with normal occlusion: a longitudinal study.
    Tibana RH; Palagi LM; Carneiro MS; Almeida MA; Miguel JA
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 18575305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cephalometric norms for the Chinese: a compilation of existing data.
    Moate SJ; Darendeliler MA
    Aust Orthod J; 2002 Mar; 18(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 12502125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Sudanese female face: normative craniofacial measurements and comparison with African-American and North American White females.
    Salah M; Higzi MA; Ali RW; Naini FB
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1704-9. PubMed ID: 25012648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Soft tissue cephalometric norms for a North Indian population group using Legan and Burstone analysis.
    Jain P; Kalra JP
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 40(3):255-9. PubMed ID: 20965694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Soft tissue profile analysis in a sample of South African Blacks with bimaxillary protrusion.
    Beukes S; Dawjee SM; Hlongwa P
    SADJ; 2007 Jun; 62(5):206, 208-10, 212. PubMed ID: 17886588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of soft tissue facial profile in white males.
    Zylinski CG; Nanda RS; Kapila S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Jun; 101(6):514-8. PubMed ID: 1598891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors affecting changes in soft tissue profile after various treatment modalities for skeletal Class II malocclusion: A cross-sectional study.
    Khan AR; Fida M; Sukhia RH
    Int Orthod; 2019 Sep; 17(3):497-505. PubMed ID: 31257136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perceptions of a balanced facial profile.
    Czarnecki ST; Nanda RS; Currier GF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Aug; 104(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 8338071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of soft-tissue profiles in Le Fort I osteotomy patients with Dolphin and Maxilim softwares.
    Nadjmi N; Tehranchi A; Azami N; Saedi B; Mollemans W
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Nov; 144(5):654-62. PubMed ID: 24182581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Vertical photogrammetric evaluation of the soft tissue profiles of two different racial groups: a comparative study.
    Diouf JS; Ngom PI; Fadiga MS; Badiane A; Diop-Ba K; Ndiaye M; Diagne F
    Int Orthod; 2014 Dec; 12(4):443-57. PubMed ID: 25457394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Size and shape of soft-tissue facial profile: effects of age, gender, and skeletal class.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1997 Nov; 34(6):498-504. PubMed ID: 9431467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Palestinians norms of Steiner cephalometric analysis.
    Hussien E; Al-Khateeb S; Mowais MA
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):e5-9. PubMed ID: 21490988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.