These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23951948)

  • 21. Homosexual mating preferences from an evolutionary perspective: sexual selection theory revisited.
    Gobrogge KL; Perkins PS; Baker JH; Balcer KD; Breedlove SM; Klump KL
    Arch Sex Behav; 2007 Oct; 36(5):717-23. PubMed ID: 17674179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Relationship dealbreakers: traits people avoid in potential mates.
    Jonason PK; Garcia JR; Webster GD; Li NP; Fisher HE
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 Dec; 41(12):1697-711. PubMed ID: 26445853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Machiavellianism in long-term relationships: Competition, mate retention and sexual coercion.
    Brewer G; Abell L
    Scand J Psychol; 2015 Jun; 56(3):357-62. PubMed ID: 25656335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The Mediating Role of Parental Influence on the Relationship Between Adult Children's Filial Piety Beliefs and Mate Preferences.
    Zhang LR; Chen WW
    Evol Psychol; 2020; 18(4):1474704920969110. PubMed ID: 33107335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Women's preferences for sexual dimorphism in height depend on menstrual cycle phase and expected duration of relationship.
    Pawlowski B; Jasienska G
    Biol Psychol; 2005 Sep; 70(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 16038772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Euclidean Mate Value and Power of Choice on the Mating Market.
    Conroy-Beam D
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2018 Feb; 44(2):252-264. PubMed ID: 29082804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sexual dimorphism of male face shape, partnership status and the temporal context of relationship sought modulate women's preferences for direct gaze.
    Conway CA; Jones BC; DeBruine LM; Little AC
    Br J Psychol; 2010 Feb; 101(Pt 1):109-21. PubMed ID: 19460236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Netflix and Chill? What Sex Differences Can Tell Us About Mate Preferences in (Hypothetical) Booty-Call Relationships.
    March E; Van Doorn G; Grieve R
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(4):1474704918812138. PubMed ID: 30428700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The role of ego-identity status in mating preferences.
    Dunkel CS; Papini DR
    Adolescence; 2005; 40(159):489-501. PubMed ID: 16268128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The long and short of mistress relationships: Sex-differentiated mate preferences reflect a compromise of mating ideals.
    Choy BKC; Li NP; Tan K
    J Pers; 2023 Apr; 91(2):383-399. PubMed ID: 35567542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Assortative mating based on cooperativeness and generosity.
    Tognetti A; Berticat C; Raymond M; Faurie C
    J Evol Biol; 2014 May; 27(5):975-81. PubMed ID: 24581285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. What do women's advertised mate preferences reveal? An analysis of video dating profiles.
    Goetz CD
    Evol Psychol; 2013 May; 11(2):383-91. PubMed ID: 23718946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sex differences in sexual psychology produce sex-similar preferences for a short-term mate.
    Shackelford TK; Goetz AT; LaMunyon CW; Quintus BJ; Weekes-Shackelford VA
    Arch Sex Behav; 2004 Aug; 33(4):405-12. PubMed ID: 15162086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Experimental Evidence for Sex Differences in Sexual Variety Preferences: Support for the Coolidge Effect in Humans.
    Hughes SM; Aung T; Harrison MA; LaFayette JN; Gallup GG
    Arch Sex Behav; 2021 Feb; 50(2):495-509. PubMed ID: 32440927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Predictive validity and adjustment of ideal partner preferences across the transition into romantic relationships.
    Gerlach TM; Arslan RC; Schultze T; Reinhard SK; Penke L
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2019 Feb; 116(2):313-330. PubMed ID: 28921999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Partner choice creates competitive altruism in humans.
    Barclay P; Willer R
    Proc Biol Sci; 2007 Mar; 274(1610):749-53. PubMed ID: 17255001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Sexual orientation and shifts in preferences for a partner's body attributes in short-term versus long-term mating contexts.
    Lucas M; Koff E; Grossmith S; Migliorini R
    Psychol Rep; 2011 Jun; 108(3):699-710. PubMed ID: 21879616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Perceptions about parents' relationship and parenting quality, attachment styles, and young adults' intimate expectations: a cluster analytic approach.
    Einav M
    J Psychol; 2014; 148(4):413-34. PubMed ID: 24946387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Romantic preferences in Brazilian undergraduate students: from the short term to the long term.
    Castro FN; de Araújo Lopes F
    J Sex Res; 2011 Sep; 48(5):479-85. PubMed ID: 20830643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Who dares, wins : Heroism versus altruism in women's mate choice.
    Kelly S; Dunbar RI
    Hum Nat; 2001 Jun; 12(2):89-105. PubMed ID: 26192164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.