These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23952287)
1. Roughness perception in tactile channels: evidence for an opponent process in the sense of touch. Gescheider GA; Wright JH Somatosens Mot Res; 2013 Sep; 30(3):120-32. PubMed ID: 23952287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perception of the tactile texture of raised-dot patterns: further evidence of an opponent process in the sense of touch. Gescheider GA; Wright JH Somatosens Mot Res; 2018 Jun; 35(2):59-68. PubMed ID: 29706104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perception of the tactile texture of raised-dot patterns: a multidimensional analysis. Gescheider GA; Bolanowski SJ; Greenfield TC; Brunette KE Somatosens Mot Res; 2005 Sep; 22(3):127-40. PubMed ID: 16338822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Physical determinants of the shape of the psychophysical curve relating tactile roughness to raised-dot spacing: implications for neuronal coding of roughness. Sutu A; Meftah el-M; Chapman CE J Neurophysiol; 2013 Mar; 109(5):1403-15. PubMed ID: 23221417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Neural coding mechanisms in tactile pattern recognition: the relative contributions of slowly and rapidly adapting mechanoreceptors to perceived roughness. Blake DT; Hsiao SS; Johnson KO J Neurosci; 1997 Oct; 17(19):7480-9. PubMed ID: 9295394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tactile sensitivity of children: effects of frequency, masking, and the non-Pacinian I psychophysical channel. Güçlü B; Oztek C J Exp Child Psychol; 2007 Oct; 98(2):113-30. PubMed ID: 17597140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tactile perception of nonpainful unpleasantness in relation to perceived roughness: effects of inter-element spacing and speed of relative motion of rigid 2-D raised-dot patterns at two body loci. Kitada R; Sadato N; Lederman SJ Perception; 2012; 41(2):204-20. PubMed ID: 22670348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tactile perception of roughness: raised-dot spacing, density and disposition. Dépeault A; Meftah el-M; Chapman CE Exp Brain Res; 2009 Aug; 197(3):235-44. PubMed ID: 19579021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sanshool on The Fingertip Interferes with Vibration Detection in a Rapidly-Adapting (RA) Tactile Channel. Kuroki S; Hagura N; Nishida S; Haggard P; Watanabe J PLoS One; 2016; 11(12):e0165842. PubMed ID: 27935970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tactile roughness: neural codes that account for psychophysical magnitude estimates. Connor CE; Hsiao SS; Phillips JR; Johnson KO J Neurosci; 1990 Dec; 10(12):3823-36. PubMed ID: 2269886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mesenteric and tactile Pacinian corpuscles are anatomically and physiologically comparable. Pawson L; Checkosky CM; Pack AK; Bolanowski SJ Somatosens Mot Res; 2008 Sep; 25(3):194-206. PubMed ID: 18821284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relative effects of the spatial and temporal characteristics of scanned surfaces on human perception of tactile roughness using passive touch. Meftah el-M ; Belingard L; Chapman CE Exp Brain Res; 2000 Jun; 132(3):351-61. PubMed ID: 10883383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Time course and action spectrum of vibrotactile adaptation. Hollins M; Goble AK; Whitsel BL; Tommerdahl M Somatosens Mot Res; 1990; 7(2):205-21. PubMed ID: 2378193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of receptor density on the tactile perception of roughness: implications for neural mechanisms of texture perception. Gescheider GA; Wright JH Somatosens Mot Res; 2021 Sep; 38(3):202-213. PubMed ID: 34387144 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]