158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23952580)
1. Closure of the uterine incision with one or two layers after caesarean section: a randomized controlled study in sheep.
Lapointe-Milot K; Rizcallah E; Takser L; Abdelouahab N; Duvareille C; Pasquier JC
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 May; 27(7):671-6. PubMed ID: 23952580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hydrosonographic assessment of the effects of 2 different suturing techniques on healing of the uterine scar after cesarean delivery.
Sevket O; Ates S; Molla T; Ozkal F; Uysal O; Dansuk R
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2014 Jun; 125(3):219-22. PubMed ID: 24680843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk of Cesarean scar defect following single- vs double-layer uterine closure: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Di Spiezio Sardo A; Saccone G; McCurdy R; Bujold E; Bifulco G; Berghella V
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 50(5):578-583. PubMed ID: 28070914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of adding a second layer to a single unlocked closure of a Cesarean uterine incision: randomized controlled trial.
Bennich G; Rudnicki M; Wilken-Jensen C; Lousen T; Lassen PD; Wøjdemann K
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 47(4):417-22. PubMed ID: 26489989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Single- versus double-layer closure of the caesarean (uterine) scar in the prevention of gynaecological symptoms in relation to niche development - the 2Close study: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
Stegwee SI; Jordans IPM; van der Voet LF; Bongers MY; de Groot CJM; Lambalk CB; de Leeuw RA; Hehenkamp WJK; van de Ven PM; Bosmans JE; Pajkrt E; Bakkum EA; Radder CM; Hemelaar M; van Baal WM; Visser H; van Laar JOEH; van Vliet HAAM; Rijnders RJP; Sueters M; Janssen CAH; Hermes W; Feitsma AH; Kapiteijn K; Scheepers HCJ; Langenveld J; de Boer K; Coppus SFPJ; Schippers DH; Oei ALM; Kaplan M; Papatsonis DNM; de Vleeschouwer LHM; van Beek E; Bekker MN; Huisjes AJM; Meijer WJ; Deurloo KL; Boormans EMA; van Eijndhoven HWF; Huirne JAF
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Mar; 19(1):85. PubMed ID: 30832681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of uterine closure on residual myometrial thickness after cesarean: a randomized controlled trial.
Roberge S; Demers S; Girard M; Vikhareva O; Markey S; Chaillet N; Moore L; Paris G; Bujold E
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 214(4):507.e1-507.e6. PubMed ID: 26522861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of dystocia and previous cesarean uterine scar on the tensile properties of the lower uterine segment.
Buhimschi CS; Buhimschi IA; Yu C; Wang H; Sharer DJ; Diamond MP; Petkova AP; Garfield RE; Saade GR; Weiner CP
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Mar; 194(3):873-83. PubMed ID: 16522428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A new technique for uterine incision closure at the time of cesarean section: does it make a difference?
Elkhouly NI; Abdelaal NK; Solyman AE; Elkelani OA; Elbasueny BF; Elhalaby AF
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Apr; 42(3):416-423. PubMed ID: 34155957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Uterine caesarean closure techniques affect ultrasound findings and maternal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Stegwee SI; Jordans I; van der Voet LF; van de Ven PM; Ket J; Lambalk CB; de Groot C; Hehenkamp W; Huirne J
BJOG; 2018 Aug; 125(9):1097-1108. PubMed ID: 29215795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of methods for uterine incision closure on repeat caesarean section scar of lower uterine segment.
Yasmin S; Sadaf J; Fatima N
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2011 Sep; 21(9):522-6. PubMed ID: 21914406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transverse uterine incision non-closure versus closure: an experimental study in sheep.
Gül A; Simşek Y; Uğraş S; Gül T
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2000 Oct; 79(10):813-7. PubMed ID: 11304961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ultrasound evaluation of the uterine scar after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial of one- and two-layer closure.
Hamar BD; Saber SB; Cackovic M; Magloire LK; Pettker CM; Abdel-Razeq SS; Rosenberg VA; Buhimschi IA; Buhimschi CS
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Oct; 110(4):808-13. PubMed ID: 17906013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ultrasound cesarean scar assessment one year postpartum in relation to one- or two-layer uterine suture closure.
Hanacek J; Vojtech J; Urbankova I; Krcmar M; Křepelka P; Feyereisl J; Krofta L
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Jan; 99(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 31441500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [A modified Sarafoff suture for closure of the uterine wound in Cesarean section].
Müller R; Köhler R; Schultze H; Wolansky D
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1990; 112(13):803-9. PubMed ID: 2238982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of single- vs double-layer closure on adverse outcomes and uterine scar defect: a systematic review and metaanalysis.
Roberge S; Demers S; Berghella V; Chaillet N; Moore L; Bujold E
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Nov; 211(5):453-60. PubMed ID: 24912096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Longitudinal transvaginal ultrasound evaluation of cesarean scar niche incidence and depth in the first two years after single- or double-layer uterotomy closure: a randomized controlled trial.
Bamberg C; Hinkson L; Dudenhausen JW; Bujak V; Kalache KD; Henrich W
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Dec; 96(12):1484-1489. PubMed ID: 28832909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An evaluation of uterine scar integrity after cesarean section in rabbits.
Dunnihoo DR; Otterson WN; Mailhes JB; Lewis DF; Grafton WD; Brown CC
Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Mar; 73(3 Pt 1):390-4. PubMed ID: 2644598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Methods for myometrium closure and other factors impacting effects on cesarean section scars of the uterine segment detected by the ultrasonography.
Hayakawa H; Itakura A; Mitsui T; Okada M; Suzuki M; Tamakoshi K; Kikkawa F
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(4):429-34. PubMed ID: 16612704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ultrasound evaluation of Cesarean scar after single- and double-layer uterotomy closure: a cohort study.
Glavind J; Madsen LD; Uldbjerg N; Dueholm M
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Aug; 42(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 23288683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The trauma of the hysterotomy incision].
Negura A; Gavrilita L; Ardeleanu D
Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1988 Mar; 83(3):161-4. PubMed ID: 3285443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
