158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23952580)
21. Impact of purse-string uterine suture on scar healing after a cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.
Halouani A; Dimassi K; Ben Mansour A; Triki A
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Jul; 5(7):100992. PubMed ID: 37127211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Purse-string double-layer closure: a novel technique for repairing the uterine incision during cesarean section.
Turan C; Büyükbayrak EE; Yilmaz AO; Karsidag YK; Pirimoglu M
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2015 Apr; 41(4):565-74. PubMed ID: 25370526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Incomplete healing of the uterine incision after elective second cesarean section.
Tekelioğlu M; Karataş S; Güralp O; Murat Alınca C; Ender Yumru A; Tuğ N
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Mar; 34(6):943-947. PubMed ID: 31146610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Single-layer or double-layer suturing of the uterine incision in cesarean section?].
Iankov M
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1999; 38(3):10-3. PubMed ID: 10734669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of single- versus double-layer uterine closure during caesarean section on postmenstrual spotting (2Close): multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled superiority trial.
Stegwee SI; van der Voet LF; Ben AJ; de Leeuw RA; van de Ven PM; Duijnhoven RG; Bongers MY; Lambalk CB; de Groot C; Huirne J;
BJOG; 2021 Apr; 128(5):866-878. PubMed ID: 32892392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [The single-layer uterine suture in cesarean section. A comparative study].
Tischendorf D
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1987 Feb; 47(2):117-20. PubMed ID: 3552857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Single- versus double-layer uterine incision closure and uterine rupture.
Gyamfi C; Juhasz G; Gyamfi P; Blumenfeld Y; Stone JL
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 Oct; 19(10):639-43. PubMed ID: 17118738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Modified Sarafoff suture for single layer closure of uterotomy in cesarean section. A prospective study].
Heidenreich W; Brüggenjürgen K
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1995; 117(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 7879462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Double-layer closure of uterine incision with visceral and parietal peritoneal closure: are they obligatory steps of routine cesarean sections?
Ohel G; Younis JS; Lang N; Levit A
J Matern Fetal Med; 1996; 5(6):366-9. PubMed ID: 8972417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Ultrasound evaluation of the uterine scar after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial of one- and two-layer closure.
Ceci O; Scioscia M; Bettocchi S; Cantatore C; Nardelli C; Laera A; Vimercati A
Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Feb; 111(2 Pt 1):452; author reply 452. PubMed ID: 18238987
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of the primary cesarean hysterotomy scars after single- and double-layer interrupted closure.
Kataoka S; Tanuma F; Iwaki Y; Iwaki K; Fujii T; Fujimoto T
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Dec; 95(12):1352-1358. PubMed ID: 27617416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Barbed sutures versus conventional sutures for uterine closure at cesarean section; a randomized controlled trial.
Zayed MA; Fouda UM; Elsetohy KA; Zayed SM; Hashem AT; Youssef MA
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Mar; 32(5):710-717. PubMed ID: 29082807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Single versus two layer suturing for closing the uterine incision at caesarean section.
Enkin MW; Wilkinson C
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2000; (2):CD000192. PubMed ID: 10796177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Scar appearance of different skin and subcutaneous tissue closure techniques in caesarean section: a randomized study.
Gaertner I; Burkhardt T; Beinder E
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 May; 138(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 17825472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparative study of single layer and conventional closure of uterine incision in cesarean section.
Lal K; Tsomo P
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1988 Dec; 27(3):349-52. PubMed ID: 2904896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Hydrosonographic Assessment of the Effect of Two Different Suture Materials on Healing of the Uterine Scar after Cesarean Delivery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.
Sevket O; Takmaz T; Ozcan P; Halici BNA; Islek SH
Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2021 Apr; 225(2):140-145. PubMed ID: 32588418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Incomplete healing of the uterine incision after caesarean section: Is it preventable?
Yazicioglu F; Gökdogan A; Kelekci S; Aygün M; Savan K
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Jan; 124(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 16023780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Uterine scars after caesarean delivery: From histology to the molecular and ultrastructural level.
Paping A; Basler C; Ehrlich L; Fasting C; Melchior K; Ziska T; Thiele M; Duda GN; Timm S; Ochs M; Rancourt RC; Henrich W; Braun T
Wound Repair Regen; 2023; 31(6):752-763. PubMed ID: 37955528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Techniques for performing caesarean section.
Hema KR; Johanson R
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2001 Feb; 15(1):17-47. PubMed ID: 11359313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Ultrasonographic analysis of cesarean scars features in nonpregnant uterus].
Zimmer M; Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Tomiałowicz M; Michniewicz J; Wiatrowski A; Mikołajczyk K
Ginekol Pol; 2007 Nov; 78(11):842-6. PubMed ID: 18306913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
