1593 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23953069)
1. Anti-Müllerian hormone versus antral follicle count for defining the starting dose of FSH.
Lan VT; Linh NK; Tuong HM; Wong PC; Howles CM
Reprod Biomed Online; 2013 Oct; 27(4):390-9. PubMed ID: 23953069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The addition of anti-Müllerian hormone in an algorithm for individualized hormone dosage did not improve the prediction of ovarian response-a randomized, controlled trial.
Magnusson Å; Nilsson L; Oleröd G; Thurin-Kjellberg A; Bergh C
Hum Reprod; 2017 Apr; 32(4):811-819. PubMed ID: 28175316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Effect of domestic highly purified urinary follicle stimulating hormone on outcomes of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer in controlled ovarian stimulation].
Ye H; Huang GN; Cao YX; Zhong Y; Huang YH; Zhu GJ; Zhou LM; Chen ZJ; Shi JZ; Zeng Y; Weng N; Huang XF; Yang J; Zhu YM; Li YP; Yi D; Zhuang GL
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Nov; 48(11):838-42. PubMed ID: 24444561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Circulating basal anti-Müllerian hormone levels as predictor of ovarian response in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization.
Nardo LG; Gelbaya TA; Wilkinson H; Roberts SA; Yates A; Pemberton P; Laing I
Fertil Steril; 2009 Nov; 92(5):1586-93. PubMed ID: 18930213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Individualized FSH dosing based on ovarian reserve testing in women starting IVF/ICSI: a multicentre trial and cost-effectiveness analysis.
van Tilborg TC; Oudshoorn SC; Eijkemans MJC; Mochtar MH; van Golde RJT; Hoek A; Kuchenbecker WKH; Fleischer K; de Bruin JP; Groen H; van Wely M; Lambalk CB; Laven JSE; Mol BWJ; Broekmans FJM; Torrance HL;
Hum Reprod; 2017 Dec; 32(12):2485-2495. PubMed ID: 29121350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. PIVET rFSH dosing algorithms for individualized controlled ovarian stimulation enables optimized pregnancy productivity rates and avoidance of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.
Yovich JL; Alsbjerg B; Conceicao JL; Hinchliffe PM; Keane KN
Drug Des Devel Ther; 2016; 10():2561-73. PubMed ID: 27563236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ovarian response markers lead to appropriate and effective use of corifollitropin alpha in assisted reproduction.
La Marca A; D'Ippolito G
Reprod Biomed Online; 2014 Feb; 28(2):183-90. PubMed ID: 24368127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predictive factors of ovarian response and clinical outcome after IVF/ICSI following a rFSH/GnRH antagonist protocol with or without oral contraceptive pre-treatment.
Andersen AN; Witjes H; Gordon K; Mannaerts B;
Hum Reprod; 2011 Dec; 26(12):3413-23. PubMed ID: 21954280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The use of anti-Müllerian hormone and antral follicle count to predict the potential of oocytes and embryos.
Majumder K; Gelbaya TA; Laing I; Nardo LG
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 Jun; 150(2):166-70. PubMed ID: 20223579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Individualised gonadotropin dose selection using markers of ovarian reserve for women undergoing in vitro fertilisation plus intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI).
Ngwenya O; Lensen SF; Vail A; Mol BWJ; Broekmans FJ; Wilkinson J
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2024 Jan; 1(1):CD012693. PubMed ID: 38174816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Anti-Mullerian Hormone (AMH) levels in serum and follicular fluid as predictors of ovarian response in stimulated (IVF and ICSI) cycles.
Tolikas A; Tsakos E; Gerou S; Prapas Y; Loufopoulos A
Hum Fertil (Camb); 2011 Dec; 14(4):246-53. PubMed ID: 22088130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Antral follicle count, anti-mullerian hormone and inhibin B: predictors of ovarian response in assisted reproductive technology?
Muttukrishna S; McGarrigle H; Wakim R; Khadum I; Ranieri DM; Serhal P
BJOG; 2005 Oct; 112(10):1384-90. PubMed ID: 16167941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of antral follicle count and serum anti Müllerian hormone level for determination of gonadotropin dosing in in-vitro fertilization: randomized trial.
Li HWR; Ko JKY; Lee VCY; Yung SSF; Lau EYL; Yeung WSB; Ho PC; Ng EHY
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Mar; 55(3):303-309. PubMed ID: 31325336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Individualized versus standard FSH dosing in women starting IVF/ICSI: an RCT. Part 2: The predicted hyper responder.
Oudshoorn SC; van Tilborg TC; Eijkemans MJC; Oosterhuis GJE; Friederich J; van Hooff MHA; van Santbrink EJP; Brinkhuis EA; Smeenk JMJ; Kwee J; de Koning CH; Groen H; Lambalk CB; Mol BWJ; Broekmans FJM; Torrance HL;
Hum Reprod; 2017 Dec; 32(12):2506-2514. PubMed ID: 29121269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcomes of anti-Müllerian hormone-tailored ovarian stimulation protocols in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles in women of advanced age.
Liao CC; Lee RK; Lin SY; Lin MH; Hwu YM
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 55(2):239-43. PubMed ID: 27125408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A randomized, controlled, pilot trial on the effect of dehydroepiandrosterone on ovarian response markers, ovarian response, and in vitro fertilization outcomes in poor responders.
Yeung TW; Chai J; Li RH; Lee VC; Ho PC; Ng EH
Fertil Steril; 2014 Jul; 102(1):108-115.e1. PubMed ID: 24796766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of anti-Müllerian hormone as a test for the prediction of ovarian reserve.
Kwee J; Schats R; McDonnell J; Themmen A; de Jong F; Lambalk C
Fertil Steril; 2008 Sep; 90(3):737-43. PubMed ID: 17923131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Antimüllerian hormone in gonadotropin releasing-hormone antagonist cycles: prediction of ovarian response and cumulative treatment outcome in good-prognosis patients.
Arce JC; La Marca A; Mirner Klein B; Nyboe Andersen A; Fleming R
Fertil Steril; 2013 May; 99(6):1644-53. PubMed ID: 23394782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Melatonin concentration in follicular fluid is correlated with antral follicle count (AFC) and in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes in women undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) procedures.
Zheng M; Tong J; Li WP; Chen ZJ; Zhang C
Gynecol Endocrinol; 2018 May; 34(5):446-450. PubMed ID: 29185361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predictive value of anti-müllerian hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone and antral follicle count on the outcome of ovarian stimulation in women following GnRH-antagonist protocol for IVF/ET.
Tsakos E; Tolikas A; Daniilidis A; Asimakopoulos B
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Dec; 290(6):1249-53. PubMed ID: 25001569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
