These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Opposite Distortions in Interval Timing Perception for Visual and Auditory Stimuli with Temporal Modulations. Yuasa K; Yotsumoto Y PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0135646. PubMed ID: 26292285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sensory effects on judgments of short time-intervals. Grondin S; Meilleur-Wells G; Ouellette C; Macar F Psychol Res; 1998; 61(4):261-8. PubMed ID: 9870293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The consistency of crossmodal synchrony perception across the visual, auditory, and tactile senses. Machulla TK; Di Luca M; Ernst MO J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jul; 42(7):1026-38. PubMed ID: 27045320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of type of interval, sensory modality, base duration, and psychophysical task on the discrimination of brief time intervals. Rammsayer TH Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 May; 76(4):1185-96. PubMed ID: 24596081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Recalibration of temporal order perception by exposure to audio-visual asynchrony. Vroomen J; Keetels M; de Gelder B; Bertelson P Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Dec; 22(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 15561498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stimulus spacing effects in duration perception are larger for auditory stimuli: data and a model. Penney TB; Brown GD; Wong JK Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Mar; 147():97-104. PubMed ID: 23978665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Visual-auditory differences in duration discrimination depend on modality-specific, sensory-automatic temporal processing: Converging evidence for the validity of the Sensory-Automatic Timing Hypothesis. Rammsayer T; Pichelmann S Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Nov; 71(11):2364-2377. PubMed ID: 30362412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multimodal integration of time. Bausenhart KM; de la Rosa MD; Ulrich R Exp Psychol; 2014; 61(4):310-22. PubMed ID: 24351985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Weighted integration suggests that visual and tactile signals provide independent estimates about duration. Ball DM; Arnold DH; Yarrow K J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 May; 43(5):868-880. PubMed ID: 28230397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Combined effects of motor response, sensory modality, and stimulus intensity on temporal reproduction. Indraccolo A; Spence C; Vatakis A; Harrar V Exp Brain Res; 2016 May; 234(5):1189-98. PubMed ID: 25869739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tri-modal integration of visual, tactile and auditory signals for the perception of sequences of events. Bresciani JP; Dammeier F; Ernst MO Brain Res Bull; 2008 Apr; 75(6):753-60. PubMed ID: 18394521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Auditory enhancement of visual temporal order judgment. Hairston WD; Hodges DA; Burdette JH; Wallace MT Neuroreport; 2006 May; 17(8):791-5. PubMed ID: 16708016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Recalibration of multisensory simultaneity: cross-modal transfer coincides with a change in perceptual latency. Di Luca M; Machulla TK; Ernst MO J Vis; 2009 Nov; 9(12):7.1-16. PubMed ID: 20053098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of auditory and visual apparent motion presented individually and with crossmodal moving distractors. Strybel TZ; Vatakis A Perception; 2004; 33(9):1033-48. PubMed ID: 15560506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of stimulus duration on audio-visual synchrony perception. Kuling IA; van Eijk RL; Juola JF; Kohlrausch A Exp Brain Res; 2012 Sep; 221(4):403-12. PubMed ID: 22821079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]